Kettlebell Training For Football?
#1
Posted 29 February 2008 - 09:44 PM
This screams to me of functional strength. I tried a few movements with some light weight yesterday and could see how this could be a huge deal for interior lineman developing strength in leverage and for skill players increasing both their explosive power and balance. These also do a fantastic job of developing grip strength.
I don't think that they should/could replace your core lifts, but they would make an awesome supplement to them.
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=Lwme8rkzetg
#2 Guest_INDfootballlover_*
Posted 01 March 2008 - 02:49 PM
Are any teams using Kettlebells to workout? Anyone using them in APC class?
This screams to me of functional strength. I tried a few movements with some light weight yesterday and could see how this could be a huge deal for interior lineman developing strength in leverage and for skill players increasing both their explosive power and balance. These also do a fantastic job of developing grip strength.
I don't think that they should/could replace your core lifts, but they would make an awesome supplement to them.
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=Lwme8rkzetg
We have been using Kettle Bell training for two years to supplement our core lifting. We have found it to be excellent for building muscle tension and forearm and hand strength. It is well worth the investment.
#3
Posted 01 March 2008 - 04:55 PM
#4
Posted 02 March 2008 - 10:32 AM
#5
Posted 02 March 2008 - 01:42 PM
Just from the small amount of research I have done, I have seen probably around 50 different lifts. As I stated in the original post "I don't think that they should/could replace your core lifts, but they would make an awesome supplement to them." There is no doubt in my mind that I am working my core muscles unlike I have ever done before. The design of the weight alllows me to do different exercises than I could with a dumbbell as well as work the support muscles in ways I haven't before.
If I were going to implement these into a traditional football workout, I would still concentrate on the traditional mass-building exercises and then use these lifts as supplementals with the emphasis being on conditioning and injury prevention.
This post has been edited by TW: 02 March 2008 - 04:53 PM
#6 Guest_gridiron_*
Posted 02 March 2008 - 02:00 PM
They have actually been around for a long time (1940's I believe) The Russian strongmen used them. The Russian army began using them also because they were so efficient at building strength and endurance simultaneously. The Russians even did a study to measure; strength, (3 power lifts and grip strength) strength endurance, (pull-ups and dip) and endurance (1000m run). They used 2 test groups; 1 that did specific training and 1 that used kettlebells only. The group that used kettlebells did better overall than the other group. Now how much better...I don't know, I remember reading this on a website so take it for what you will.
The big question is what do you hope to get out of your off season workouts. Kettle bells aren't going to make you big and bulky, but do you really need that. If you are just as strong that mass doesn't really matter, save maybe for linemen, but even then, a stronger linemen can win out vs a bigger linemen. I think they could be an effective tool for any team. Do I think you could replace everything with them? No. They could be a good change up or a nice addition to a workout, however the time of a student-athlete is already slim so adding to a workout could be tough. I think they would be excellent for during the season workouts...keep strength, increase the ability to absorb ballistic shock, plus get in some aerobic stuff. Just my thoughts!
This post has been edited by gridiron: 02 March 2008 - 02:03 PM
#7 Guest_INDfootballlover_*
Posted 02 March 2008 - 05:00 PM
#8
Posted 02 March 2008 - 06:41 PM
gridiron, on Mar 2 2008, 12:00 PM, said:
I guess I am greedy...I want big, strong players who are fast! ;)
Seriously though, I'm not saying that kettlebells could not serve a significant purpose in someone's weight-training program. The original post asked if the benefits made them worth the investment; in my opinion, I think there are many different lifts/exercises that one could implant using the equipment provided in a standard weightroom that would provide the same benefits as the kettlebells. I saw on the Internet that kettlebells range in cost from $40 all the way up to $230 per item, so we're talking about quite an investment for a "good change-up workout". I could find many other ways to spend that money, but again, to each his own.
#9
Posted 05 March 2008 - 03:00 PM
The basic principle in using kettlebells to train athletes is so that athletes 'train on their feet'. We want our guys doing strength/conditioning movements that are very similar to what they would be doing during a football/baseball/basketball game.
Like I said earlier, we just recently added kettlebells to our off-season workouts, so we're still kind of new to the whole thing. However, our two strength/conditioning Guru's are RKC (Russian Kettlebell Challenge) certified, so they know their stuff.
Off the top of my head, we do 1-arm swings, 2-arm swings, cleans, clean & press, & snatches. I know there a few more that we do, but I can't think of them right now.
#10
Posted 05 March 2008 - 11:21 PM
#11
Posted 07 March 2008 - 12:57 AM
pep76, on Mar 5 2008, 11:21 PM, said:
I agree. I was always more sore after a workout with my track coach, who knew just about every exercise there was with kettlebells, than after a football workout.
They didn't start using kettlebells in our football conditioning program until this past season.
This post has been edited by VLinc63: 07 March 2008 - 12:58 AM


Help


Back to top
MultiQuote








