Jump to content
Head Coach Openings 2024 ×

wabashalwaysfights

Coach
  • Posts

    229
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Personal Information

  • School
    Attica
  • Affiliation
    Coach / Staff

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

wabashalwaysfights's Achievements

Explorer

Explorer (4/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Dedicated
  • Conversation Starter
  • First Post
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

  1. So a "grassroots movement" over... semantics? I mean, you do you, but I don't really see what this accomplishes.
  2. As a Crawfordsville alum, this is really exciting! Paying homage to the Monon Line and able to capitalize on the idea of MACtion (as the poster above highlights) is brilliant!
  3. This has been discussed a lot in our area and makes a ton of sense given the way roster sizes have gone in recent years. I struggle to see anyone above 1A doing this, but I suppose they could if they had to. 11 man JV would definitely be preferable, but 8 man JV is better than no JV; you are still giving those athletes a chance to develop against competition that is similar to themselves rather than throwing them "into the fire" as a sophomore with no intermediate experience between Jr. high and Varsity ball.
  4. There would be a bit of irony here in that Allen coached under Creighton for one season years ago when Creighton was at Wabash. I believe Allen was the DBs Coach/ST Coordinator during the 2007 season. Both great guys; I hate that it hasn't worked out for Tom, but would love to see CC get an opportunity at a P5 school.
  5. I would struggle to see SV wanting to go back to that well. My understanding "through the grapevine" so to speak was that they regretted leaving the WRC in the first place and it was a bit of a struggle to get back in (the Parke Heritage consolidation helped that along immensely). Maybe they would want to go back at this point, but it would suprise me.
  6. WCGrad92, you likely know the WIC far better than I do, what are they likely to do should NP, and later SP and Greencastle, make that move? I'm not sure how many teams are in the WIC, so are they likely to look to add someone? Stay pat?
  7. Reading the NP post again, I think I misread it initially. I initially had read it as they (NP) were joining the 5 former SAC schools at the high school level and that because of that the youth leagues were joining together. On second read, that does not appear to be the case. Still, it seems interesting that the post is apparently no longer posted on whichever account it originated from. Still, my apologies. The only excuse I can offer is that I had not yet had my coffee when I made that initial post so my brain was not operating at peak efficiency.
  8. Seeger would make no sense geographically, if that even matters. It's almost an hours drive to the closest of the five former SAC schools. The three Putnam County schools make the most sense for an eventual eight team conference down the road, so coupled with the quoted post below, I would definitely say one of those three, though I don't know as much about the WIC. Is this from Facebook? And if it is, is it still posted? I ask because this statement reads as if written by someone who is in the know but taken with the corresponding silence from North Putnam maybe wasn't supposed to let the cat out of the bag yet. Regardless, North Putnam does make the most sense as the sixth team and with the new league not starting until 2026-2027, that g8ves plenty of time to bring the other two Putnam County schools on board. The question remains: what do Lebanon, Tri-West, and Danville do? There are plenty of options I think for each, but what I can't figure out is why would they want to keep the Sagamore Conference name intact? If those three were each targeting separate or a joint move to other existing conferences, why are the othere five leaving of their own accord? Seems like this is simple one of many dominoes in West Central Indiana.
  9. Everyone is going to focus on the call at the end of the game, which is fine (though it was the correct call), but I have a different bone entirely to pick. @Bobref and our other fine official friends, is the so called "Double Cheek" QB sneak play not illegal in that it appears that the entire Philly offensive line is well into the neutral zone? I admittedly like the concept, and if pushing the QB forward is now perfectly legal am all for it, but the alignment of the interior OL makes my head explode.
  10. That was waaay harder than you would think it would be...
  11. Count me in the camp that honestly thinks the biggest issue with the Colts right now is that Irsay is way too involved and should let Ballard do his job. The QB issues over the past two seasons (getting rid of Wentz, which I think was a mistake, and benching Ryan, which was definitely a mistake) were direct Irsay decisions. Neither was the long term solution, but Irsay stepping definitely made things worse. Ballard may not be the guy, but Irsay's meddling has made it impossible to definitively say that. Edit: and for the record, I really like Irsay generally as an owner, I just really hate how he has handled this situation.
  12. https://saturdayoutwest.com/washington-state-cougars/washington-state-legend-luke-falk-recounts-incredible-mike-leach-story/ I should have paid more attention while he was still with us.
×
×
  • Create New...