Muda69 Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 14 minutes ago, foxbat said: With open enrollment, wouldn't most schools in Indiana be considered "non-boundaried" or "semi-boundaried." No, because government schools cannot decline to enroll students in good standing who reside within their defined geographical boundaries. They can, however, choose to not enroll students who live outside of that same defined geographical boundary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxbat Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 28 minutes ago, Muda69 said: No, because government schools cannot decline to enroll students in good standing who reside within their defined geographical boundaries. They can, however, choose to not enroll students who live outside of that same defined geographical boundary. Again, semi-boundaried. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tango Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 3 hours ago, Titan32 said: This is smart. I like the idea of the multiplier...and removing it if the school never has any success in a given sport. Never is a mighty long time... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titan32 Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 2 minutes ago, tango said: Never is a mighty long time... That was poor wording by me...over a period "X" might be better. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footballking16 Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 9 hours ago, crimsonace1 said: Illinois, which has a multiplier (1.65x) actually has an "anti-success factor" where the multiplier is waived if you haven't won the equivalent of a sectional in something like the last four years. The multiplier is also applied to charter schools, not just p/ps. A 1.65 multiplier would have had Cathedral classified where they’ve been ever since the SF was implemented…5A. 6 hours ago, Titan32 said: This is smart. I like the idea of the multiplier...and removing it if the school never has any success in a given sport. Ah, so like, the Success Factor? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titan32 Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 6 hours ago, Footballking16 said: A 1.65 multiplier would have had Cathedral classified where they’ve been ever since the SF was implemented…5A. Ah, so like, the Success Factor? No…like lack of success factor. I’m going to need you to pay attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.