Professor's race-based class participation policy inspired by Chairman Mao

[Muda69]

https://campusreform.org/article?id=18978

Quote

The "Class Discussion Guidelines" section of Ana Maria Candela's "Social Change -Introduction to Sociology" syllabus, which instructs white male students to wait their turn to speak after "non-white folks" talk, opens with a quotation about speaking from Mao Zedong, the communist Chinese dictator who killed 45 million people. 

“No investigation, no right to speak," the quote reads in the document for the Binghamton University class. 

In 2016, The Washington Post reported that the dictator's death toll made him the "biggest mass murderer in the history of the world."

The quotation "helps to convey the idea that speaking, during class discussions, should be based on having done your investigative work," Candela writes.

The professor's scholarship "focuses on Chinese migrations to Latin America and on the global dimensions of Chinese history and China's social transformations," according to her university webpage. 

For class discussions, Candela utilizes "progressive stacking" to condition students' participation and speaking based on their race and gender, according to her syllabus, which Campus Reform obtained. 

"Progressive stacking" prioritizes student ideas and interactions based on the participants' race and gender. 

"This [policy] means that wetry to give priority to non-white folks, to women, and to shy and quiet people who rarely raise their hands," the syllabus states. "It also means that if you are white, male, or someone privileged by the racial and gender structures of our society to have your voice easily voiced and heard, we will often ask you to hold off on your questions or comments to give others priority and will come back to you a bit later or at another time."

Campus Reform spoke with Binghamton students who were aware of Candela's "progressive stacking" policy. An excerpt of the document had gone viral online after the Twitter account Libs of Tik Tok posted a screenshot of a Binghamton parents' Facebook group discussing the text. 

 

This is psychotic pic.twitter.com/Cp7rtgRrTw

— Libs of Tik Tok (@libsoftiktok) January 31, 2022

 

Binghamton student Sean Harrigan questioned whether "progressive stacking" would penalize students' participation grades if they never got a chance to speak because of how they were born. 

“How am I supposed to get full participation when the professor won’t call on me even though I had my hand up the longest?” Harrigan asked.

Michael Lawrence told Campus Reform that he has "experienced classes that partake in similar rules." 

"Progressive stacking," according to Lawrence, teaches "students to victimize people and see them as less than many of their peers.” 

Emme Young, another Binghamton student, called the policy "embarrassing." 

“It’s pretty embarrassing that I pay tuition to a school that has a class with that syllabus,” Young said.

Campus Reform also obtained a screenshot of a group conversation between members of the university's College Republicans chapter discussing the participation policy. 

“Can anyone tell me how this is legal,” one student asked.

“Well that’s sociology for ya," another student replied. 

Campus Reform reached out to Binghamton University for comment. 

Ryan Yarosh, senior director of media and public relations, said that Candela was "counseled" by the university due to the syllabus' failure to comply with the 2021-2022 Faculty-Staff Handbook.

Good. I hope this inane "progressive stacking" was removed by the Ms. Candela, at the request of the university.

Most liberal college these days must be hell on earth.