swordfish

https://nypost.com/2022/03/22/senators-should-ask-ketanji-brown-jackson-whether-she-backs-the-yale-law-hecklers-or-free-speech/ Senators should ask Ketanji Brown Jackson whether she backs the Yale Law hecklers — or free speech By Post Editorial Board March 22, 2022 4:34pm Should Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson join the Supreme Court, she’ll be a role model for students seeking careers in the legal profession. So senators this week should ask her views of protesters who shut down a recent Yale Law School discussion on free speech. The Federalist Society event paired Monica Miller of the progressive American Humanist Association and Kristen Waggoner of the conservative Alliance Defending Freedom. Yet some 120 students refused to tolerate anything the ADF (which they deem an anti-LGBT “hate” group because of its religious-liberty work) might say, so they assaulted the event, raising a ruckus and threatening panelists in a bid to silence them. The protesters stomped, shouted, clapped, sang and pounded the walls nearby, making so much noise it disrupted classes, The Washington Free Beacon reports. They also blocked the only exit and grabbed and jostled at least two FedSoc members. Police had to be called to escort panelists safely from the site. Worse, more than 60% of the law school’s student body (the most privileged future lawyers in the land!) signed a letter backing the protesters. “If you can’t talk to your opponents, you can’t be an effective advocate,” notes Miller, the fellow progressive the mob muzzled. If this behavior is allowed, warns Waggoner (and Yale Law’s done nothing about it), “the future of the legal profession in America is in dire straits.” So: Will would-be Supreme Court Justice Jackson condemn the mob and announce that she won’t hire any of its members as clerks? If not, she doesn’t deserve a single senator’s blessing of her ascent. “If you can’t talk to your opponents, you can’t be an effective advocate,” notes Miller, the fellow progressive the mob muzzled. If this behavior is allowed, warns Waggoner (and Yale Law’s done nothing about it), “the future of the legal profession in America is in dire straits.” Agreed.....

Does anyone else think it spells trouble when a SCOTUS nominee "can't" or won't give a basic definition of "woman". It (IMHO) indicates her obvious leanings towards the progressive ultra-left wing line of thinking. Would it be too much trouble for a well qualified, highly educated sitting Judge to answer that question "female"? She used the term "woman" describing herself yesterday along with the term "black" which I am pretty sure she could and probably would proffer a definition of that word. Bad answer (IMHO). https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/22/blackburn-jackson-define-the-word-woman-00019543 As the confirmation hearing for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson went into hour 13, Sen. Marsha Blackburn asked the Supreme Court nominee on Tuesday to define the word “woman.” “I can’t — ” Jackson replied. “You can’t?” Blackburn said. “Not in this context. I’m not a biologist,” Jackson said. “The meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can’t give me a definition?” Blackburn asked. The Tennessee Republican’s line of questioning hit on nearly every political hot-button issue, from critical race theory to teaching children about gender identity in schools to Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer on the University of Pennsylvania’s women’s team. Jackson said her role as a judge would be to address disputes about a definition and to interpret the law. “The fact that you can’t give me a straight answer about something as fundamental as what a woman is underscores the dangers of the kind of progressive education that we are hearing about,” Blackburn said, before turning to Thomas, who has been at the center of the debate over policies for transgender athletes. Blackburn asked what message allowing Thomas to compete sends to “girls who aspire to compete and win in sports?” “Senator, I’m not sure what message that sends. If you’re asking me about the legal issues related to it — those are topics that are being hotly discussed, as you say, and could come to the court,” Jackson said before Blackburn cut her off, to explain her view of what message this delivers to young women. “I think it tells our girls that their voices don’t matter,” Blackburn responded. “I think it tells them that they’re second-class citizens. And parents want to have a Supreme Court justice who is committed to preserving parental autonomy and protecting our nation’s children.”

Popped in on the SCOTUS hearings during lunch. Reading some of the stories I noticed that Ms. Brown "pushes back" while I recall Kavanaugh's "angrily denying".

Then why the passionate defense? Why not ignore him? Sorry Bobref - I waded into this topic this morning, I really gotta get back to work instead of this stuff.

So satire is now considered hate speech. Too bad, SF actually found it funny (only after hearing on tthe news that Mr./Mrs. Levin was offended and Twitter was deleting it). Kinda makes me think that had Mr./Mrs. Levin ignored it, it wouldn't have become a major advertising event for the Bee. https://nypost.com/2022/03/21/twitter-suspends-babylon-bee-over-rachel-levine-man-of-the-year-title/ Twitter suspends Babylon Bee for naming Rachel Levine ‘Man of the Year’ By Ariel Zilber March 21, 2022 9:47am Updated Twitter locked the account of a right-leaning parody site, The Babylon Bee, after it awarded Rachel Levine, the transgender Biden administration official, the title of “man of the year.” The Babylon Bee story was a reaction to USA Today’s naming of Levine, who is US assistant secretary for health for the US Department of Health and Human Services, as one of its “women of the year” last week. Twitter says it will restore the account, which has more than 1.3 million followers, if the Bee deletes the tweet, but CEO Seth Dillon says he has no intention of doing so. “We’re not deleting anything,” Dillon tweeted from his personal account. “Truth is not hate speech. If the cost of telling the truth is the loss of our Twitter account, then so be it.”

And there's the point. Why give the man's (Hawley) speech any further recognition? Just ignore it, kinda like ignoring the Yale law "free speech" debate debacle in the same manner. Look, she's gonna be the next Supreme Court Justice, we all know that. She's more than qualified. Just acknowledge the fact that she was chosen to be the token "First black female SCOTUS nominee" for a geriatric racist old white President.

https://100percentfedup.com/happy-st-patricks-day-from-irelands-fully-vaccinated-and-boosted-prime-minister-who-just-tested-positive-for-covid-while-on-visit-to-u-s-got-test-results-while-sitting-maskless-next-to-nancy-p/ Vaxxed PM Michael Martin Infected with Covid Despite urging his own citizens to get the booster shot in order to combat COVID-19 surges in Ireland, the Irish PM has himself contracted the disease. The Irish government has claimed under new regulations that Boosted individuals will not need to restrict movements. However, the Taoiseach himself sat maskless and knowingly exposed to COVID next to Speaker Pelosi last night. This exposure does not seem to worry Pelosi, whose spokesperson assures us that she will “test regularly and follow CDC guidelines.” Martin and Pelosi at the Gala Perhaps showing some faultiness in the tests, the Taoiseach was tested right before entering the United States and came back negative, however a member of his delegation testing positive triggered another test for Martin which came back positive as well. Martin, much like the Democrats, has waged a crusade against the unvaccinated in Ireland, consistent only in moving goal posts to keep those double–but not triple–vaxxed removed from normal society. This is also just days after Obama, who also pushes booster jabs, tested positive for COVID-19. A reasonable person would deduce that in both of these cases, either the person pushing for boosters is not getting them–making them a massive hypocrite–or, that the boosters do not work. In either case, if there’s one benefit in this for Martin, it’s that he didn’t have to suffer through breakfast with Kamala Harris. FTA : A reasonable person would deduce that in both of these cases, either the person pushing for boosters is not getting them–making them a massive hypocrite–or, that the boosters do not work. OR - AND STAY WITH ME HERE!! OR - This proves that ANYONE and I mean ANYONE (vaxed & boosted 5 times or not) can carry this F*@^!&@ virus. Thats who SF and Mrs. SF caught it from - a Co-worker of Mrs. SF who was vaxed and boosted, but was with her grandkids over the weekend and she (the idiot) knew they were Covid positive. She thought because she was vaxed, she couldn't catch it, so wasn't worried about it, just thought she had a cold.

https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/video-shows-death-of-california-man-while-held-down-by-cops/ Harrowing video has emerged of a California DUI suspect who died after screaming “I can’t breathe!” while being held down by cops – less than two months before George Floyd uttered the same haunting words to police in Minneapolis. Edward Bronstein, 38, was taken into custody on suspicion of driving under the influence by California Highway Patrol Officer Dusty Osmanson after a traffic stop on the 5 Freeway on March 31, 2020, the Los Angeles Times reported. The suspect was taken to the CHP’s Altadena station, where officers tried forcibly to draw his blood to measure his alcohol level, but he reportedly refused. The 16-minute video captured by a sergeant shows Bronstein kneeling on the ground while an officer presses his hands onto his shoulders while another officer, who is off camera, orders him to comply with a court-ordered blood draw. “You are bringing the fight to this, not us,” one of the cops says. “I am not bringing the fight at all,” Bronstein replies. An officer then warns him that if he refuses to comply, “you are going face-down on the mat — and we going to keep on going.” After being held to the ground, Bronstein shouts, “I’ll do it willingly! I’ll do it willingly!” Several more officers pin him down with their bodies as he shouts in distress — before finally saying, “I can’t breathe!” After Bronstein stops moving, another minute elapses before the officers realize he is not responding and try to revive him. As he lies face down, one of them slaps him on the head before he is finally turned over. An officer then asks for CPR to be given — but more than 11 minutes elapse after Bronstein’s last screams before they begin to administer it. Bronstein’s family has filed a federal lawsuit against nine officers and a sergeant, alleging excessive force and a violation of civil rights. The family also is calling for the cops to be criminally charged by the LA County district attorney. The officers are Carlos Villanueva, Christopher Sanchez-Romero, Darren Parsons, Diego Romero, Dusty Osmanson, Eric Voss, Justin Silva, Dionisio Fiorella and Marciel Terry. Also named is Sgt. Michael Little. The coroner’s office attributed Bronstein’s death to “acute methamphetamine intoxication during restraint by law enforcement,” though it declared the cause as “undetermined,” the paper said. The chilling video was released Tuesday after a federal judge’s order to make it public. “The state of California did not want us to release this video,” said the family’s civil rights attorney, Luis Carrillo. “Thank God that the judge agreed with us, and that’s why you can now see this video … It’s horrible, but it is the only way his family can get some justice,” he added. CHP officials declined to comment on the case to the LA Times, citing the pending litigation. Bronstein is seen with his daughter, Isabella Bronstein. Courtesy of Bronstein Family Carrillo said the video was not part of the usual protocol for the CHP, whose officers do not wear body cameras, though the agency’s cars do have dashcams. “I suspect they shot this for training purposes and then realized later they had to reveal its existence,” he told the newspaper. Michael Carrillo, who is representing the Bronstein family with his father, said that when the cops heard Bronstein say, “I can’t breathe,” they should have stopped. “Not one officer took the action to pull the others off of him, pull him to the side, do something to give him air,” he told the LA Times. “When they finally flip him over, he’s lifeless.” The family says Bronstein was terrified of needles and believe that’s why he was initially reluctant to comply with the officers as they sought to draw his blood. “Nobody deserves to die this way. He was treated like trash, like his life was not deserving,” his daughter Brianna Palomino said during a news conference announcing the release of the footage, the LA Times reported. His death came two months before that of Floyd, who was killed in May 2020 by a Minneapolis cop who knelt on his neck and compressed his airway. Floyd’s death sparked nationwide calls for police reform. SF doesn't think that the officer in the Floyd case in Minneapolis was innocent at all, but wonders why this incident that happened only 2 months ahead of Floyds was overlooked? The guy was pulled over on suspicion of DUI and refused to let the officers draw blood due to his fear of needles - which is actually a real phobia BTW. SF wonders why the public didn't hear about this incident, or more pointedly - why the BLM crew wasn't concerned about this man's civil rights......

https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/ First, The New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate. “People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity,” The Times writes. “Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.” Authenticated!!! You don’t say. You mean, when a newspaper actually does reporting on a topic and doesn’t just try to whitewash coverage for Joe Biden, it discovers it’s actually true? No S#!T Sherlock! There's enough dirt in that laptop to literally bury the Bidens thanks to the inept Hunter. Will this be the start of the straw that breaks the camel's back? SF has predicted ever since election night this POTUS will not last past the 2 year mark.

Agreed - And I don't really have a preference which is the best, just leave the clocks alone - EVERYWHERE.

https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/ukraine-russia-putin-news-03-15-22/h_7a8e1d7f46379d4ab4195a9c21094af7 Russian TV anti-war protester's lawyer still does not know where she is From CNN’s Paul P. Murphy and Richard Greene This screen grab shows Channel One editor Marina Ovsyannikova protesting on air on March 14. (Russia Channel 1) A lawyer for the Russian TV editor who held up an anti-war sign during a live broadcast on Monday still does not know where she is, he told CNN on Tuesday. Dmitry Zakhvatov has been trying to locate Channel One editor Marina Ovsyannikova since her protest on Monday, he told CNN. Zakhvatov confirmed to CNN that Ovsyannikova is the woman seen on air holding the sign and that she is an editor for the channel. "Stop the war. Do not believe propaganda they tell you lies here," the sign read, concluding in English: "Russians against war." Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov dismissed the protest as “hooliganism.” “As far as this lady is concerned, this is hooliganism,” Peskov told reporters on a conference call Tuesday, adding that authorities are already handling her case. “The channel and those who are in charge are dealing with it,” he added. “It's not an issue on [the Kremlin] agenda.” Hooliganism is a criminal offense in Russia. Asked about possible criminal charges against Ovsyannikova, Peskov shied away from the question, referring to the “responsibility” that state TV channels bear. “There are certain departments that deal with this,” Peskov said. “The live broadcast of any TV channel and especially those who work there hold a special responsibility.” The Investigative Committee — a top Russian law enforcement agency — launched a pre-investigation check against Ovsyannikova on “public dissemination of deliberately false information about the use of the Russian Armed Forces,” Russian state news agency TASS reported Tuesday, citing an unnamed source. SF is just guessing she may not be found after that stunt......

https://www.wsj.com/articles/saudi-emirati-leaders-decline-calls-with-biden-during-ukraine-crisis-11646779430 Saudi, Emirati Leaders Decline Calls With Biden During Ukraine Crisis Persian Gulf monarchies have signaled they won’t help ease surging oil prices unless Washington supports them in Yemen, elsewhere By Dion Nissenbaum , Stephen Kalin and David S. Cloud Updated March 8, 2022 7:48 pm ET The White House unsuccessfully tried to arrange calls between President Biden and the de facto leaders of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as the U.S. was working to build international support for Ukraine and contain a surge in oil prices, said Middle East and U.S. officials. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and the U.A.E.’s Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan both declined U.S. requests to speak to Mr. Biden in recent weeks, the officials said, as Saudi and Emirati officials have become more vocal in recent weeks in their criticism of American policy in the Gulf. “There was some expectation of a phone call, but it didn’t happen,” said a U.S. official of the planned discussion between the Saudi Prince Mohammed and Mr. Biden. “It was part of turning on the spigot [of Saudi oil].” Mr. Biden did speak with Prince Mohammed’s 86-year-old father, King Salman, on Feb. 9, when the two men reiterated their countries’ longstanding partnership. The U.A.E.’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the call between Mr. Biden and Sheikh Mohammed would be rescheduled. The Saudis have signaled that their relationship with Washington has deteriorated under the Biden administration, and they want more support for their intervention in Yemen’s civil war, help with their own civilian nuclear program as Iran’s moves ahead, and legal immunity for Prince Mohammed in the U.S., Saudi officials said. The crown prince faces multiple lawsuits in the U.S., including over the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018. The Emiratis share Saudi concerns about the restrained U.S. response to recent missile strikes by Iran-backed Houthi militants in Yemen against the U.A.E. and Saudi Arabia, officials said. Both governments are also concerned about the revival of the Iran nuclear deal, which doesn’t address other security concerns of theirs and has entered the final stages of negotiations in recent weeks. The White House has worked to repair relations with two key Middle Eastern countries it needs on its side as oil prices push over $130 a barrel for the first time in almost 14 years. Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E. are the only two major oil producers that can pump millions of more barrels of more oil—a capacity that, if used, could help calm the crude market at a time when American gasoline prices are at high levels. Brett McGurk, the National Security Council’s Middle East coordinator, and Amos Hochstein, the State Department’s energy envoy, both traveled to Riyadh late last month to try to mend fences with Saudi officials. Mr. McGurk also met with Sheikh Mohammed in Abu Dhabi in a bid to address Emirati frustrations over the U.S. response to the Houthi attacks. The call with Sheikh Mohammed in early February was expected to focus on ways the two countries could counter Houthi attacks from Yemen. One U.S. official said the Biden administration has worked diligently to strengthen Saudi and Emirati missile defenses, and that America would be doing more in the coming months to help the two Gulf nations protect themselves. It may not be all the two countries want, the official said, but the U.S. is trying to address their security concerns. But the Saudis and Emiratis have declined to pump more oil, saying they are sticking to a production plan approved between their group, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, and a group of other producers led by Russia. The energy alliance with Russia, one of the world’s top oil producers, has enhanced OPEC’s power while also bringing the Saudis and Emiratis closer to Moscow. Both Prince Mohammed and Sheikh Mohammed took phone calls from Russian President Vladimir Putin last week, after declining to speak with Mr. Biden. They both later spoke with Ukraine’s president, and a Saudi official said the U.S. had requested that Prince Mohammed mediate in the conflict, which he said the kingdom is embarking on. White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki said earlier this week that there were no plans to talk to Prince Mohammed anytime soon about oil, and that there were no plans for Mr. Biden to travel to Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E. forged deep ties with former President Donald Trump, who sided with them in a regional dispute with Qatar, pulled the U.S. out of the Iran nuclear deal that they had opposed, made his first trip abroad to Riyadh in 2017 and stood by Prince Mohammed after the killing of Mr. Khashoggi. But Mr. Trump’s decision not to respond to an Iranian drone and missile attack on major Saudi oil sites in 2019 rattled Gulf partners who have relied for decades on the promise of U.S. security protection. Iran denied involvement in the oil facility attacks. The rift between Mr. Biden and Saudi Arabia’s crown prince stretches back to the 2020 presidential election, when the Democratic candidate vowed to treat the kingdom as a “pariah” state after a Saudi hit team killed Mr. Khashoggi in 2018 in Istanbul. There is “very little social redeeming value in the present government in Saudi Arabia,” Mr. Biden said during a presidential debate in 2019. After taking office, Mr. Biden released a U.S. intelligence report that concluded that Prince Mohammed had approved the plan to capture or kill Mr. Khashoggi, who had been an outspoken critic of the young Saudi ruler. Prince Mohammed has denied knowing anything about the plot, even though people close to the crown prince were convicted by a Saudi court of taking part in murdering the journalist. Mr. Biden also publicly castigated Saudi Arabia over its protracted war in Yemen and cut off the flow of some weapons Riyadh could use to target Houthis. The president also reversed a move by his predecessor that put the Houthis on America’s official list of global terrorist groups, a move that Saudi leaders said had emboldened the Yemeni force and thwarted efforts to broker a cease-fire. On Monday, Ms. Psaki said the president stood by his view that Saudi Arabia should be treated like a “pariah” state and that the leadership had little redeeming social value. When asked in an interview with the Atlantic magazine released last week if Mr. Biden misunderstood the Saudi leader, Prince Mohammed responded: “Simply, I do not care.” Prince Mohammed said alienating the Saudi leaders would hurt the U.S. president. “It’s up to him to think about the interests of America,” he said. “Go for it.” One U.S. official acknowledged that Prince Mohammed is the key Saudi decision maker, and that the Biden administration will have to find ways to work with the crown prince on everything from energy policy to normalizing relations with Israel. Along with Saudi Arabia, the U.A.E. has urged the U.S. to put the Houthis on its list of terrorist groups and to send more military aid to help defend the country from more attacks. But the U.S. hasn’t moved to address those Emirati concerns, according to Gulf officials. Last month, Gen. Frank McKenzie, the head of U.S. Central Command, flew to Abu Dhabi for a series of meetings with Emirati leaders to discuss ways to beef up security in the wake of the Houthi missile strikes. Gen. McKenzie wanted to meet with Sheikh Mohammed, but was unable to get time with the Emirati leader, according to a Middle East official. Last week, Yousef Al Otaiba, the U.A.E. ambassador to the U.S., said that relations between the two countries were strained. “It is like any relationship,” he said in Abu Dhabi. “It has strong days where the relationship is very healthy and days where the relationship is under question. Today, we’re going through a stress test, but I am confident that we will get out of it and get to a better place.” FTA - Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and the U.A.E.’s Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan both declined U.S. requests to speak to Mr. Biden in recent weeks, the officials said, as Saudi and Emirati officials have become more vocal in recent weeks in their criticism of American policy in the Gulf. There once was a time when a call by the US President was welcomed. Gee - And here I thought President Biden had all that "working with Foreign heads of state experience" over DJT.......and was going to potentially be able to secure us more oil since he kinda torpedoed our own oil drilling and pipeline access from Canada to the Gulf......Yeah, he's an idiot, but Again - at least he doesn't tweet mean stuff though. Yeah, let's go ask Venezuela for help.....That's the ticket.....

https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/united-states/kamala-harris-becoming-president-would-be-a-tragedy/video/f1424332d5208555867e048f0febb103 Former press secretary to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Iuliia Mendel, has criticised Kamala Harris for laughing following a question about Ukrainian refugees. In a now deleted Tweet, Ms Mendel wrote “it would be a tragedy if this woman won the presidency.” Yes, Ms. Mendel, there are a lot of us in the US that feel the same way. BUT - at least there are no mean tweets......

Again - it is SF's deeply held belief that President Biden won't last in his position past January 2023 for any number of reasons.......It was never the Democrat's intention, he's a puppet. We will have our first female President in 2023, who will (IMHO) choose Hillary as her VP.

Yeah - Nothing to see here......Keep moving along...... There's more to Ukraine than "Putin just wants it back". Yes he does want it to be part of Mother Russia again, but I also think he doesn't like the fact that he's not in control of the corruption anymore.....

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/watch-biden-called-out-for-racist-statement-about-three-representatives While speaking to U.S. military veterans and caregivers at Veterans Affairs facilities in Texas on Tuesday, President Joe Biden made a perplexing comment in reference to representatives joining him at the event. The president was joined by Texas Reps. Marc Veasey, Jake Ellzey, and Colin Allred to discuss environmental exposures that military servicemen and women experience. “The three congressmen you have here, two of them look like they really could and did play ball and the other one looks like he can bomb you,” Biden said. Prior to saying this, Biden spoke directly to Ellzey, who was sitting in the crowd. “Jake, you’re a fighter pilot. You get this stuff. I mean, you know what I mean. You can smile, Jake. It's OK. It’s OK,” Biden said as the crowd laughed. “Jake’s a Republican, but I like the hell out of him. He’s got — no, I’m serious. This guy’s the real deal.” Biden finished by adding that the three congressmen are “a tough group but a good group.” The video of his comment has been shared widely across social media, with many calling it racist “The context does not change the idiocy of Biden’s comment,” one Twitter user wrote. “Black guys make good ball players in Joe's racist view." “The three congressmen you have here, two of them look like they really could and did play ball and the other one looks like he can bomb you,” Biden said. 2 black guys and 1 white guy - ALL of media if Trump had said this.........

https://www.newsweek.com/us-biological-weapons-ukraine-labs-germ-warfare-1685956 As part of its latest attempts to justify its invasion of Ukraine, Russian officials are once again pushing a false narrative that the Eastern European country is developing biological weapons with the assistance of the U.S. On March 6, the Russian Defense Ministry claimed it had obtained evidence Ukraine and the U.S. had collaborated to develop biological weapons. The claim was made by Major General Igor Konashenkov and widely reported in Russian media. Konashenkov alleged that pathogens for deadly diseases such as the plague, anthrax and cholera were being created to be used for biological warfare in Ukrainian laboratories funded by the U.S. Department of Defense. Has anyone seen the Great and Powerful Dr. Fauci? Guessing he would be a great guy to ask about this.......Everyone trusts him right? Wait, did he get suicided yet? Maybe that's where he disappeared to.....

As SF sits and contemplates the current situation in Ukraine now 2 weeks in, I'm starting to realize, Zelinsky must have the goods on Putin, and whoever else in the US is or was involved in the ongoing corruption in Ukraine and has let them know (potentially - with my tin foil hat on here) he will release all the information he can on them all if he is killed.......The only reason I could come up with for why Putin hasn't blown him to bits so far...... As I stated before, he should have finished the job he started in 2014 back then instead of relying on Hillary winning the 2016 election and not being a problem for him...... But what do I know......