Slobberknocker

Tony Dungy and Carson Steele giving shout outs to Center grove

Does #47 mean Merrillville have 47 D1 players now?

It is pathetic that in week 3 there are 4 out of state schools on this list of games. We should be talking about a Carmel vs Center Grove Copper Kettle game. Heck just last night Carmel and CG played volleyball game so Carmel nonsense about play CG is just BS.

I am trying to understand the result of the play had the official not ruled initial touch by the receiving team. In this case first touch would be by the kicking after the ball broke the plane of the goal line and being batted back resulting in being touch by the receiving team. I would think that it should have resulted in touchback because I think in high school as soon as the ball breaks the plan of goal the play is over. Or should it have been placed at the 0ne yard line where it was touched the receiving player after being batted by kicking player. Or someplace else?

Nope only 2 pages. So, 5 CMP, 15 ATT, 56 YDS is decent success in your book?

WC defensive dominated Snider Passing: 5 CMP, 15 ATT, 56 YDS Rushing 28 Carries, 11 YDS, 0.39 YDS/Carry Total Yards: 67 YDS

some

Anybody know Snider Stats? I know WC had 13 TFL

Not so sure about Westfield secondary they gave up 328 yards to CG Friday. Also, it was CG QB first varsity start.

Yeh I still confused why Bobref said this was a correct ruling because it is my understanding that on a kick if the ball crosses the plan of the goal line, touched or not touched, it is a dead ball at that point which means it would be touchback for CG.

Sorry to bother you but I am just trying to understand the rules so I can be a better fan. I would look up the rule for myself, but it is my understanding that I would have to pay for it, and I am just too cheap to do that. Could you explain the Kick/punt Rule of the ball breaking the plane of the endzone? I thought that if the receiving team touching the ball would not matter because as soon as it breaks plane of the endzone it is dead ball resulting in a touchback. Is that not, correct?

I think Bobref saying the official said ball was touch by receiving team at around the 13-16 yard line. maybe off the foot of player back receiving the ball as he was moving away from catching the punt way before it was touched by K team batting it out of the endzone

I do know why an official is trying to make bet with a fan that is just trying to understand officiating process. I was at the game and did not see an official within 10 yards of a center grove coach after the play. Usually on calls like this official go to each sideline and discuss the call. I did not see that happen. So, then I see CG call timeout and cg coach approached the official on that side of the field and was just ignored so then cg coached headed to middle of field to talk to other officials. So, to me it looked like the official were blowing them off. Maybe I just missed the communication. If the Officials could have made it clear that their ruling was the player that touch the ball was player that was back receiving the punt and not the touch of the by player at the one-yard line in would not have even posted the link. That is a judgment call, and I have no problem with it even thou I might not think it is correct. To me and other fans around me thought the call was for the touch on the one-yard line and my interoperation of the rules would be that was an incorrect call. Maybe I should know the meaning of the beanbags but, I am guessing me and most of the 6000+ fans have no I deal. I have nothing but upmost respect to all official and never blame them for a loss.

Now I am very confused. I was at the game and watch the video multiple time and I did not see receiving (CG) touched the ball first. Mybe I am just blind

Should the official have explained their ruling to CG? CG burned a time out to try to talk to officials.