BARRYOSAMA
-
Posts
554 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Articles
Events
Posts posted by BARRYOSAMA
-
-
-
1 hour ago, TrojanDad said:
C'mon....you care enough to challenge AO's "weird" fascination with AOC. He isn't saying anything or sharing anything new when she proudly proclaims her socialistic/far left positions, and in the case of Amazon, her "victories".
His posts drive a predictable behavioral response.....
huh? wat?
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Muda69 said:
Yep. If the Amish get to opt out why can't all of us?
Because libertarianism is considered a cult and not a religion. Kinda like Scientology in Europe
-
1
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, foxbat said:
I think it was a reference to one of their more [recently] famous alumni.
He only hires "the best".
-
1
-
-
33 minutes ago, TrojanDad said:
You sure seem to defend her.....
I do? Pointing out SF's and others weird fascination with AOC is quite different than defending her policies.
-
2
-
-
Maybe conservatives just have crappy SAT scores?
-
1
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, TrojanDad said:
Not at all.....regardless if one is more liberal than the other (would be interesting to see how this is judged)....they are all liberal.
What we should question is how Hogg wasn't admitted to some state schools with far less rigorous academic requirements, but was admitted to Harvard. (where we know his 1270 SAT score was very much an outlier of the typical admitted student)
Was not your point that Harvard being a relatively liberal school was the reason he was accepted?
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, TrojanDad said:
Perhaps...I don't know one way or the other...but if the Cali schools are more liberal, that would seem to make them uber liberal. Note the various articles calling out or noting Harvard's liberal bias. (including Harvard's own school paper)
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/harvard-liberal-conservatives-political-bias/2018/05/29/id/863005/
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/harvard-faculty-backs-democrats-96-of-the-time-says-school-paper
Again, if Hogg had been calling out for protection of the 2nd amendment and support of the NRA, would a 1270 SAT got him admittance to Harvard?
So your point is that uber liberal schools don't like Hogg and less liberal schools like Harvard do like him? Not following you point.
Fox has more than adequately answered your question IMO.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, TrojanDad said:
Guess Harvard must see something in him that UCLA, UC-San Diego, UC-Santa Barbara, and UC-Irvine didn't........
These school are more liberal than Harvard.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, swordfish said:
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez continued to deflect criticism of her ‘Green New Deal’ over the weekend; repeatedly yelling “I’m the boss” when it comes to climate-change policy and future legislation.
“You know what? I don’t care anymore. Again, I’m at least trying and they’re not. The power is in the person who’s trying regardless of the success. If you’re trying you’ve got all the power,”
“I just introduced ‘Green New Deal’ two weeks ago and it’s creating all of this conversation. Why? Because no one else has even tried… You try, you do it. Because you’re not. Until you do it, I’m the boss. How about that?” she yelled.
So, she's the boss....
You sure seem to snap to attention whenever she is mentioned.
-
1
-
1
-
-
On 2/22/2019 at 5:22 PM, Muda69 said:
Hmm, NightHawk. American Vision, the organization in question, is not a church. They seem more like an organization that champions the turning of American into a de-facto Christian theocracy. But perusing their website at https://americanvision.org I see nothing where they advocate for the killing of homosexuals. If you find such evidence please share it with us.
Now if we do want to include traditional churches that also claim they 100% follow the teachings found in the Christian Holy Bible, and therefore according to you must also be advocates for the killing of homosexuals, should these following churches make the SPLC list as "hate groups"?
Yes. Anyone that wishes to say gays should be killed for being gay(the Bible says so) should be labeled a hate group. What say you?
-
1
-
-
You, yourself (in bold print no less) showed where that church claimed to follow the Biblical teaching on homosexuality. The Biblical teaching in Leviticus is clearly to kill gays.
If you advocate killing of a group of people with out actually killing them based on their sexual orientation, this is clearly a hateful group.
Are you suggesting that you have to physically kill someone to be considered a hate group?? Clearly you are not that stupid? Or maybe Wabash82 is correct....
-
2
-
-
On 2/22/2019 at 5:04 PM, Muda69 said:
Should that church in question be on the SPLC's list?
If they advocate death to gays, I say Yes. What say you?
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Muda69 said:
It was all quite sad.
Dare I say....hateful
-
1
-
-
Not a stretch at all. You highlighted the fact that this church advocates for the Biblical treatment of gays (death). Thanks again.
-
1
-
-
42 minutes ago, Muda69 said:
Another Dot on the ‘Hate Map’: https://spectator.org/another-dot-on-the-hate-map/
The Bible tells us to kill the gays. If this group follows the Bible with regards to homosexuality as they say they do....they are pretty hateful.
Thanks for sharing this article that shows the SPLC is looking out for those who have been terrorized by folks that try to hide their hatred behind the Bible.
-
1
-
-
19 minutes ago, TrojanDad said:
But supporting what IO and SF said, I think (or at least hope) most of this country thinks this guy's an idiot nutcase.
Unfortunately, way too many in the comment section, don't seem to think so.
-
1
-
-
Just now, TrojanDad said:
I don't know...purely speculation on my part...but it feels today, an agenda of new media (on both sides of the political spectrum) dictate what catches fire....as they attempt to reach their audiences.
Its about the politics....and ultimately the $$.
Clicks no doubt drive decisions. Wonder why the MSM thought this story might get clicks....
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, TrojanDad said:
I don't know if I buy that....there was probably Klan talk plenty (unfortunately) when BO was president. Perhaps, the media may decide when issues become front page news......
Upon further investigation there was. I wonder why this story caught caught fire....
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, Impartial_Observer said:
YOU INTIMATED THAT HE SOMEHOW GOT SPECIAL TREATMENT WITH NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER. NOT READING BETWEEN BETWEEN LINES. YOUR BIAS IS PLAIN AS DAY.
Slow down, use your words. I was speaking of all members of congress at the airport, not the train station.
As it turns out....some do receive preferential treatment.....https://www.cheatsheet.com/culture/not-everybody-has-to-go-through-airport-security.html/
And now, as a former VP, he's exempt for life from TSA line.
SEMANTICS, AND YES I HAVE WORN THEM A FEW TIMES. CRAZY JOE PROBABLY HAS MORE OCCASION TO WEAR THEM THEN I.
I would argue this isn't semantics, words mean things:
Own:
/ōn/
adjective & pronoun-
1.used with a possessive to emphasize that someone or something belongs or relates to the person mentioned."they can't handle their own children"
verb-
1.have (something) as one's own; possess."his father owns a restaurant"
synonyms: be the owner of, possess, be the (proud) possessor of, have in one's possession, have to one's name, count among one's possessions, have, keep, retain, maintain, hold, be blessed with, enjoy, boast "I own this house"
Wear:
/wer/verb-
1.have on one's body or a part of one's body as clothing, decoration, protection, or for some other purpose."he was wearing a dark suit"
synonyms: be dressed in, be clothed in, have on, sport; More
Congrats on wearing them, I'm too tight to buy the shirt with the cuffs, and would have VERY few occasions to wear. I bet you looked really cool. When I get inducted into the GID Hall of Fame, can you loan me a shirt and your cuff links, it would be epic.
THE NEW NORMAL IS TO CALL THEM "ALTERNATIVE FACTS". HE APPEARS TO HAVE DONE HIS JOB AND NOT EXPLOITED IT. SHOCKING, I KNOW.
I never said he didn't do his job, he's worked in government for essentially his entire adult life, that's the definition of eating at the public trough. When he campaigns he talks about all that is wrong with the country, for the last 42 years, he's been one of the dudes creating that. He's in Germany right now shoveling that crap. I've never used the term "alternative facts", I'm not sure how you perceive anything I've typed as "alternative facts". You keep bringing up my bias, R's, D's, they're two sides of the same coin.
Look I get it, Biden's your guy, my only point in all of this is it really seems odd to me that he's an anomaly when it comes to career politicians and their finances. I had a local rep that did two stints short stints and fared much better financially. He was taken very good care of following the Obamacare vote based on the fact that everyone knew a Yea vote meant the end of his time as District 9 rep.
I obviously own them and have worn the cufflinks and your effort to make some sort of weak personal jab at my "coolness" is cute. Waste of time.
Never said Biden's "my guy". Another conjecture by you trying to mask your biased attack on the fella. Look, I get it, you don't like to be called on your biases. Not the end of the world.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, Muda69 said:
Why must Mr. Sutton speak for anybody other than himself?
He seems to be parroting someone who speaks and tweets with the same level of idiocy
-
1
-
-
It was a public user reply form. Unsecured site but I rolled the dice.
Here is what I sent:
Mr. Sutton
Why were you so emboldened to make such an inflammatory statement in your recent editorial? Any insight would be welcome.
Good Day,
Everett Stokes
I will keep you posted. No answer to a phone call. It would seem that Mr. Goodloe has gone on radio silence after all these unfair, fake news attacks on a true southern gentleman.
I got your sarcasm. If he doesn't speak for ALL conservatives, he must, in your estimation, speak for SOME conservatives. Is this the point you were trying to make?
Looks like Mr. Sutton also likes to attack NFL players, Muslims, Mexicans, and call women nasty names. Hmmmm. I wonder if he only speaks for the 3000 subscribers or is there a larger narrative here and that Sutton is just one example.
-
1
-
-
12 hours ago, Impartial_Observer said:
I’m sure his contact info is available since he OWNS the paper, why don’t you contact him and ask him?
It's a print only newspaper with no web site. If you find an email for Goodloe Sutton I will ask him and CC you.
Still scratching my head as to why he might have been so brazen in 2019 to make these comments that seem to embarrass much of his own state.
-
1
-
-
11 hours ago, Impartial_Observer said:
I know I’m going to ragret (sic) this!
TAKING A TRAIN INSTEAD OF AIR TRAVEL SPUN AS A NEGATIVE. PRETZEL LOGIC.
How did I spin anything, he took the train, I offered some possible reasons why. There’s nothing between the lines to read. YOU INTIMATED THAT HE SOMEHOW GOT SPECIAL TREATMENT WITH NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER. NOT READING BETWEEN BETWEEN LINES. YOUR BIAS IS PLAIN AS DAY.
THIS AVERAGE JOE HAS HIS GRANDPA'S GOLD CUFFLINKS. SHOOTING A SHOTGUN IN THE AIR SEEMS EXACTLY WHAT AN AVERAGE JOE WOULD DO.
You might have missed the part where I said “wears”, which means you actually have them physically on their person, or in this case their clothes. Congrats on your inheritance, do you “wear” them? I think they look cool as hell, but since I don’t have any shirts with French cuffs, or cuff links, I’m pretty much out. I’ve never fired a firearm into the air, as Foxy pointed out those projectiles will eventually come down. I’ve never seen it done either. SEMANTICS, AND YES I HAVE WORN THEM A FEW TIMES. CRAZY JOE PROBABLY HAS MORE OCCASION TO WEAR THEM THEN I.
IF YOU'VE GOT THE MONIKER "CRAZY UNCLE JOE", YOU'VE, BY DEFINITION, NOT GOTTEN A PASS. OR MAYBE HE IS JUST STUPID
I’m sorry, I got nothing.
NO ONE SAID HE WAS BROKE, JUST HASN'T FED AT THE TROUGH. OR MAYBE HE IS JUST STUPID. POOR SPIN ATTEMPT.
Busted, I took some creative license, he’s not broke. Hasn’t fed at the public trough? HE WAS A US SENATOR FOR 36 YEARS! FOLLOWED BY EIGHT YEARS AS VP! He has a pretty sweet pension package, I’d say he’s got his face buried in the trough. THE NEW NORMAL IS TO CALL THEM "ALTERNATIVE FACTS". HE APPEARS TO HAVE DONE HIS JOB AND NOT EXPLOITED IT. SHOCKING, I KNOW.
-
1
-
The Draft Should be Abolished for Everyone — Not Just Women
in Out of Bound Forum
Posted
Even though my original statement was tongue in cheek, that was pretty easy.
Thanks for providing the template.