BARRYOSAMA

I would rather not speculate on things I have no knowledge of. I will leave that to the needy.

Pure speculation on your part. Bloviation.

Naming the whistleblower....just another distraction.

Tyreek Hill ran a 9.98 in juco

If you read it, you clearly didn't grasp what it said. It was written 11 weeks ago....10 weeks prior to the articles of impeachment that I was referring to and you were responding to. No I don't want you to send more that "challenge the levels of depth alleged by the Dems"....I don't even know what the hell that means. All I was saying is that the articles of impeachment are clear and concise. Trump abused his power and tried to cover it up. You posted a link and claimed that CNN's legal analyst did not think the articles of impeachment were clearly laid out but the link had nothing to do with the actual articles of impeachment.

much better

Did you read the article? Stick to memes calling other people stupid....

That article was written 11 weeks ago...and specific to 1) the the transcript of Trump's phone call to the Ukrainian President where he abused his authority and tried to get the Ukrainians to investigate the Biden's while holding Congressionally approved military funds hostage and 2) the White House and DOJ's obstruction of justice by not handing over said transcript when there was a "credible and urgent" inspector general's report. The fact that Toobin said there wasn't much juice has absolutely nothing to to with the articles of impeachment as it was specific to the handing over of the transcript. Did you read the article?

Abuse of power and obstruction of justice. Clear as day. All day.

Name calling. Sad

Unfortunately for Trump, he sure thinks he can do whatever he wants when he tried to bully the Ukraine into opening an investigation for a personal gain. Then obstructing Congress' constitutional right to check and balance becomes a second high crime and misdemeanor.

Horowitz also conceded that the conspiracy theory that Obama hired James Bond to spy on Trump COULD NOT BE RULED OUT. Silliest thing I've read today.

Yet Horowitz found that the opening of the case was entirely justified. Cherry picking again

So the straight shooter says there is no bias and the Trump cuck says there is bias. Hmm tough call. FBI agents are part of the executive branch....they will probably claim executive privilege like their boss.

Had you read the Reuters article.....No bias. Deflection and Distraction for the abuser of power and obstructor of justice.

Initial investigation in to Russian interference, not impeachment. Jeez. That investigation led to all kids of obstructionist behavior by the executive branch, which will obviously spark more investigation, i.e. the Mueller report. The impeachment started with the whistleblower detailing Trump's high crimes and misdemeanors. Typical right wing whacko distortion and distraction. Deep state....scary stuff

That's a screen shot

You the one making the claim using a bogus site. Good lord you are gullible.

They were low level non decision makers. Because they were having an affair, Trump makes the juicy distraction. The sheep eat it up and when the facts are revealed....it become a deep state conspiracy. All too predictable

The inevitable conspiracy theory.....wow what a shock. Appointed by Bush, Horowitz is a career straight shooter. Some can't handle that and prefer lies. I'll cite Reuters as opposed to "AnalyzingAmerica.com" lol https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-horowitz/doj-watchdog-michael-horowitz-is-a-career-straight-shooter-colleagues-say-idUSKBN1YD111

That according to Horowitz, showed no bias.

That's a real believable link. lol

All D-One football programs can and do develop kids into better athletes. And you say you don't bloviate....

Complete fiction. Barr will fire Horowitz and make up the "real" facts.