Warriorfan

Well mom has always been know for her charitable acts dealing with the mentally impaired, I guess someone had to drive and cut up your food for you.

Don't let the uneducated fool you it is and always will be Wolves

Now that sounds a lot like sour grapes from a guy who was turned down by his mom for his senior prom date.

I wont disagree that the Sheridan schedule was and has been for some time a tougher row to hoe than many other schools. I've coached against both teams, and watched both and IMO very humble opinion the pioneer team captained by a now Notre Dame player was a more dominant team than the Sheridan team of 07. As far as the differences in the Attica team of 00 and the Rockville tam of 07. The Atica team had essentially 14 guys that played most of the reps. the scored almost 700 points that year and gave up about 130. Im sure that when you look at it from the perspective of good offense or good defense they were great on both sides of the ball. They lost the state game because of a poor call by the coach, everyone in the building knew Smith was getting the ball, but again who could argue not trusting him to score. We can most certainly agree to disagree but the numbers favor the Ramblers for a dominant year in the WRC both offensively and defensively

Yep I sure would, and then go watch football, and if he would remember to unwrap his gum he wouldn't have that issue.

I would agree that the Rockville team of 07 was very good but if you look at the dominance of the Attica team of 00-01 they pounded people both offensively and defensively, and if you compare margin of victory between those two teams Attica gets the nod running away. As far as teams having trouble with the Sheridan team of 07, I think many would agree that the Pioneer team that won last year was one of if not the most dominant 1A team to win a title. That Pioneer team gave up only 39 points the Sheridan team of 07 gave up 113

So backs don't have to read blocks nor do offensive line men have to read fronts to execute blocking schemes? No matter how you slice it the complexity of an offense rests on the players ability to execute their respective across the board. Obviously you have never run the ball in a game because i've coached a few all conference backs who would would most certainly DIS-agree with you about the complexity of running the ball through traffic vs throwing it to people in open space. As far as Logan's ability to throw the ball, I know he is a good athlete, with great skill I have seen him play, but I will tell you this it is MUCH easier to complete a pass against a poor secondary filled with sub-par athletes who are not that good, than it is to do when the people you are playing against have good athletes. My point is very simple Until they play someone who has a good football team they wont know how good they truly are, and to call them a good team because they have beaten poor opponents is premature. As far as your question you can let people hit you in the balls all day long if that's what you want ill just keep watching football.

Not taking anything away From Logan I happen to be friends with his dad (and I'm sure Ronnie would agree) but they have 1000 passing yards against a combined win loss record of 1-8 in their first three outings. He is a great athlete and I wish him the very best but if your comment is aimed at trying to prove (that's prove with a V not an F or if it makes you happy ill say trying to proof) the strength of their offense , I would wait until they play some stronger competition.

Just keep play with your cows and let the thinkers do the hard work ok pumpkin...……..

Again the point I am making is that those kids who are good enough to play special teams for a varsity team who has limited numbers (who mainly play on Monday night) are more often than not used in subbing (or need to be used in subbing situations) IMO the quarter rule does not work well for smaller schools who try to field to competitive teams. Which is why I said it needs to be amended, because just adding a quarter does not necessarily help. I would never want to over play any athlete or risk injury by them playing to much, but the current rule makes it tough for the small schools.

I guess to elaborate more on my comment (which is why I said it needs to be amended) I understand the IHSAA's attempt to help by adding a quarter but IMO I personally have coached teams that needed kids to play on the special teams and be a sub for a few reps here or there on offense or defense and it counted as a quarter because they played. So in essence the quarter rule does little by adding a quarter to help with that issue. I don't want to over play kids and get them hurt but when numbers are low it makes it tough to put two teams on the field that are competitive. I used the statement as those kids being special teamers but meant it as kids who see limited reps as a sub in situations,

I am aware of the change i don't think the current 6 is enough. When a small school needs kids both on Friday and Monday and a kid plays special teams for a few plays and it counts as a quarter it doesn't work.

Its hard to compare offenses over the years, I think some times people like TANAKA or is it TATANKA or however its spelled, gets caught up in the now or fandom. The WRC has had many powerful prolific offensive teams over the years. The Seeger team that won the title was extremely good. I'm not saying they put up huge points as a comparison but they controlled the ball and were pretty balanced, and they always had an answer for defensive adjustments. Then you look at the Attica team that lost in the final with the Smith kid, they were a very good offensive team. The NV team that won the State had a pretty potent offense that the conference struggled defending. That's just a few of examples of past "JUGGERNAUTS" That is a very tough question to answer but i can tell you this its hard to compare teams of the past with those who have not completed their season, because you are not comparing apples to apples at this point. The WOLVES are playing well for Coach Moore but i'd be hesitant to call them the best in WRC history.

I agree as well but the first issue i see especially for smaller schools is the quarter rule. It needs to changed, amended or something. With the opportunity for kids to have at least an extra quarter it would help to get them in earlier. Yes he is doing the WOLVES proud

I believe Herb Kings favorite song is Zombies originally done by the Cranberries and covered by the group Bad Wolves!!!!

Not sure how good the Attica team really is since two of their three wins came from teams who are 1-2. Just not sure I would call this game a real test for PH. Going a step further if they do get a running clock what has it really proved? I'll wait til the end of the season going in to the tournament before I would concede that they are really an offensive powerhouse.

Question-- Does Elwood win a game this year?

Maybe you can take some WOLVES with you for protection on you little sailing trip

As a coach who has competed against both programs in my career, I can tell you that both programs are well coached and usually well prepared for each game. Year in and out they both usually have solid athletes and each program has a solid tradition, but I would give the edge in most categories to Pioneer at this point. I believe its their game to lose. Furthermore I would never say that any team could not beat any other team, on the contrary I do see LaVille's chances as pretty good. I'm just not convinced that they are good enough. Good luck to both teams in what looks to be a heavily followed match.

Heard a little talk about PH being the team to beat in the WRC I think that NV may hold that honor.

You sir are an absolute idiot. Deflect all you want. You are flat out wrong. Only an idiot would think the plural form of a wolf is wolfs. I feel sorry for you I truly do.

HOW? you have proven nothing BRO except that your an idiot Look at the facts you started this crap by calling the Parke Heritage team the Wolfs I showed you (PROVED) they were not called the "WOLFS" then you change your argument to that of the people of rockville are spelling it wrong. Then when given proof that you could easily look up you tell me i am photo shopping, WOW great comeback there. All you have as you proof is YOU saying everyone else is wrong. So the people of the communities of Rockville, Marshall,Tangier, Michigan City and many other places that have the "WOLVES" as a mascot are spelling it wrong and you who cant even use your own evidence (Great WOLF lodge) correct are right. I guess i must be missing something here but what exactly have you proven other that you are an idiot. Do yourself a favor and stop pretending to navigate through a debate when you cant show any tangible evidence . Your word means nothing BRO

If you could actually prove me wrong id be happy to admit it. You have nothing LOL GREAT "WOLFS" LODGE LOL nice try

Yeah because there are so many Great Wolf lodge variations in America or anywhere in the world for that matter. You must be a lonely sad little man. I guess i keep re-posting because I feel sorry for you.