Muda69

Nice to know you supposedly received one.

Prohibiting Religious Services Makes the First Amendment a Coronavirus Victim https://reason.com/2020/05/06/prohibiting-religious-services-makes-the-first-amendment-a-coronavirus-victim/

Authoritarians never let a good crisis go to waste.

Still doesn't change the fact that I haven't voted for a uni-party candidate in 20+ years, and most likely never will again. Guess I live outside of your mathematical law.

Laws can be changed. Or broken.

Most politicians and public officials believe themselves to be above the rules, all along the political spectrum. What else is new? Boy, you really are bent out of shape concerning Howe's assertion aren't you? Let's do an informal poll of the GID populace. Who here personally knows an individual (family, friend, co-worker, acquaintance) that currently has or have tested positive for the Covid-19 virus? I'll go first. The number is zero. The closest so far is my son (who works on site at an essential industry) had a co-worker in the same office who became ill with covid-19 like symptoms. However the subsequent test came back negative.

It doesn't matter. A presidential election is not a horse race. https://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/news-media/horse-race-reporting-election/

The money to be made during this pandemic is with vaccines, and Mr. Fauci is at the center of it. Here is a long interview with RFK Jr. on the issue. Worth the listen:

That's a nice picture of you.

Yes, let's balance:

Carmel partners with company to test residents' feces for coronavirus https://www.indystar.com/story/news/local/hamilton-county/carmel/2020/05/05/carmel-partners-company-test-residents-feces-covid-19/5170420002/

That kind of fits in with the 6-week cycle theory: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4481443/user-clip-six-week-cycle

If pointing out a GID member's mistake of not looking up the actual statement made by another GID member places me in a "posse" then so be it.

No, the math hurts my brain. I need a dedicated "math person" like you have.

Yes, let us get back to the memes.

Sorry, I don't answer questions from individuals who end their spoken or written sentences with "right?". Frankly it is a condescending speech virus. Besides, your question should be aimed on Howe, not I. And your "math person" needs to rerun their equations using this corrected input.

8 Possible Reasons for the Huge International Differences in COVID-19 Deaths https://reason.com/2020/05/04/8-possible-reasons-for-the-huge-international-differences-in-covid-19-deaths/

Actually I just did type something wrong. Guess I was so lazy I typed an extra letter to make "match" instead of "math". My apologies for the transgression.

Yes, he did. You apparently were just to lazy to click back to the previous page and look for it: You have a "match person"?

Yes it is. Do you have anything of real substance to add to this discussion?

No, it has not changed. How do I define that phrase? Well since a preamble, which that phrase is a part of, does not confer additional powers to those granted or recognized in a statute or constitution, it is just a "nice too have" feel-good statement of little real substance. I'll also point you here: https://individualrightsgovernmentwrongs.com/founding-fathers/the-founders-and-the-general-welfare/ Thomas Jefferson called the phrase “a mere ‘grammatical quibble’ that has countenanced the general government in a claim of universal power”. He mistakenly believed that the Founder’s had clarified their intentions and meaning, and debate over the meaning of the phrase would cease. The Founders clearly understood the “general welfare” to mean the good of all citizens, not an open-ended mandate for Congress. The only good that applies to all citizens is freedom, and government’s proper role is the protection of that freedom. That was the meaning intended by the Founders. Those who sought to expand government’s powers chose to ignore the explanations offered by the Founders. Corrupted by bad philosophy, they rejected the principles of the Founders and of the Constitution.

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/trump-biden-how-about-neither-why-justin-amash-s-2020-ncna1197981 More choice is always good.