Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

Personal Information

  • School
    Bedford North Lawrence
  • Affiliation
    Coach / Staff
    Just some creepy stalker

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. For the falcons to have a shot, they will have to catch our safety sleeping, or with his eyes in the backfield. That's the beauty of playing a week 1 opponent like southridge, exposes deficiencies early on, and allows plenty of time to fix said deficiences. The offense rolls. Miners 35-7.
  2. Unless the Miners relapse, and make a lot of mistakes like in the first game, I just don't think this game is going to be close. The Bulldogs have struggled so far, and I'm not sold on the strength of their previous two opponents. Miners by 3.....scores.
  3. This is going to be a back and forth game. I don't see either team running away with it. 21-20. Miners
  4. The lack of the sullivan faithful's participation on this site has always surprised me. Are they still using dial up over there??
  5. I've always, at least since the late 90's, been impressed with coverage the H-T gives us. No offense Schwing @ts32, you do a superb job as well! But for being 40 miles away, they go above and beyond what I think is expected of them. Miners by 1 point.
  6. In response to Muda's question And yours While I don't know the exact details involving peacetime vs wartime statuses, I can tell you that Reservists who weren't assigned to a certain number of days active duty can't use "Veterans Preference" when they apply for federal employment. A so called "special goody" for those active duty military personnel vs those who aren't. So in a way, the military/federal government does qualify veteran status based on service.
  7. In order for a Reservist to get Veterans Preference status for Federal Employment, they would've had to been put on active duty status for at least 90 or 120 days. I'm not certain which.
  8. Why do you automatically assume that I want to discredit her? Again, I don't know what happened in the minutes leading up to the clip. I want to see what kind of info she throws out into the world, gain a little context.
  9. Initially there wasn't. Twitter erupted, and the media reported. A firestorm ensued. Then the entire video came out. News outlets redacted stories and people deleted their tweets. You provide a 15 sec clip with no idea of what happened before she started filming. Did you read her tweets?
  10. We should probably approach this video with the same skepticism that wasn't afforded to the original clip that set this into motion. I would like to know what happened those minutes leading up to this 15 second clip before I make any conclusions. I clicked to see additional tweets from this person, and IF true, you will find some of her language pretty disgusting. I don't tweet, so I don't know how accurate or inaccurate her past tweets are, or if they can be altered.
  • Create New...