Irishman

Feelings are not hurt at all. I read the original feedback; disagreed with it and stated my reasoning for doing so. I gave you feedback on your feedback, and you keep responding. I am not complaining about it at all. I am simply clarifying the critical point in your feedback. You claimed there was bias in who I choose to give feedback to. I pointed out the flaws in your thinking (feedback). That is it; nothing more. I am a moderator; so now you and Howe get to set the standards for how moderators are supposed to behave? As I replied to him, Muda is a moderator as well. You gonna call him out too?

So, based on that thinking....Muda is a moderator in this forum. Should he be neutral as well? he posts a LOT more than I do as far as opinions and articles. And to think that the few who have responded to you about your posting style being lefties is pretty funny....delusional, but funny.

For someone that really does not care about the various things I have mentioned, you sure have spent a LOT of time responding. Again, I am not the only one who singled him out; yet you chose to provide "feedback" for me......but cannot handle it when I respond in kind. And yet, I am the one who may have to give up my man card....laughable at best.

Had fun watching some last night. A friend of mine on the Snider staff was giving the perspective from their side of it as well. Pretty cool to hear coaches on both sides giving their perspectives.

“Can you let go?” = let me post my negative comments about you and you should not respond......I get it. You like to accuse me of not being able to handle the feedback, yet here you are showing you cannot handle it. lol I am guessing that you assume that gonzo is the one I was referring to as far as who I was texting?

What’s the matter? You can call someone out, but don’t like the feedback you get in return? hmmmmmm....sounds familiar. Either accept the feedback that YOU are selective or don’t. Are you going to try and say you are balanced In who you call out? I have not seen it. I am not the only one that has called him out for his tone here, yet you single me out, and I only see you go after one or two other members other than me recently. I provided examples of times I have called others out. It is you that decided to shift the goal posts with the added terms of recently and in the last few days. And the fact is, you even made reference to post I made about the tone of name calling, and yet you still feel I am selective, and even avoiding calling out friends here. The fact is that is not accurate at all.

Well that changes everything........I apologize for misinterpreting the sit and spin reaction then. 😄

Yeah....so a guy who gives the sit and spin reaction is amused? yeah ok.......like I said Saturday; you're funny.

Awwwwww look at the cute little threesome we have going here. lol Get upset because someone called someone out on a post; and turn right around to do the exact same thing. It's adorable really.

Sure seems like you show bias in who you choose to call out and who you don't call out.....and at this point, I would even add who you choose to defend......interesting lol

https://variety.com/2020/tv/news/ken-osmond-dead-leave-it-to-beaver-eddie-haskell-dies-actor-1234609639/ 😢

They have their junior high teams, but Metro still plays games there. The PE classes from both Harding and EAU could use it more as well.

Yes, all of EACS is.....Heritage, Leo and Woodlan. Heritage actually rebuilt a lot of their stadium as well. They have new home bleachers and pressbox. I believe they have lockers at the stadium as well now. I still contend that with all the activity that Harding still sees, it should have been installed there as well.

We had this discussion in our coaches office a couple seasons ago. It is crazy to think about how quickly we have gone to playing a couple games on turf to now where we will be playing most games on turf. In our conference, the only schools I have not heard that is adding turf are Bellmont and Hunting North......unless I missed something. We do play at Garrett this year, but this is just a home and home contract.

I guess you cannot let go of inserting yourself into the discussion. You want to call someone out in accurately, then be prepared for the responses. So NOW you decide to insert the terms “recent history” and “last few days”? Ok funny, but ok Libtard does not set me off at all. I described it perfectly in a previous post. It is simply intellectually lazy. You are correct, he is not the only one that has posted something that could be offensive. Are you going to own your own role in that?

I am not EVEN talking about that. Your comment that I referred to for proof was the one where you claimed that the 77 members of your family combined with the 999 other people that work in the plant you do know no one who has contracted the virus. You admitted you did not talk to every one of those people prior to making the claim. I simply challenged the accuracy of the comment.

Yet here you are arguing.....I simply called him out on a claim that he made. He decided to press the issue, so I continued to show how ridiculous it was. Sure there are other posts that qualify as offensive. I typically tend to avoid the ones that are back and forth between individuals. If anyone is willing to post here, then they should be prepared for any backlash for doing so. No one else repeatedly uses a term that equals libtards throughout his posting here, especially in reference to other posters here. Occasional name calling? Yep, but nothing close to what he does here. So I have never called muda out on his posts? Yeah ok lol Or DT on the main forum? hmmmmm....selective memory or just bias on your part? Or did you choose to enter this discussion because you and Howe are on the same side of the fence? Or maybe most posters here are reasonable enough they don’t need to be called out for such an abrasive style?

You have provided the “proof” yourself. The claim you made was plain nonsense and pure conjecture on your part, but offered as fact. The proof was in your own words. I support or add interference for one side huh? And I guess you present a fair and equal amount of criticism for both sides, I guess? lol....hilarious. I can prove that just in the last week, and throughout my time, I have been critical of both sides. But because I am critical of the President, the one you so blindly support, you only see one side.

To say Howe’s posts are not unique may show your bias? Maybe your selective memory sees a bias that isn’t there? I have called others out on posting style. This has just been the most recent. My personal views of Trump are no different than my views of Biden, so that is not factoring into it. But somebody that regularly calls out or makes fun of others for their blind loyalty/allegiance to a person, group, or way of thinking, while ignoring it in himself deserves to be called out on his bs, especially when the claims like the ones he made that started this recent exchange were just ridiculous. I will say this though, and give him credit for it as well......while the conversation had two distinct views in a conversation, neither of us allowed it to devolve into childish name calling. 🙂

To clarify, are you accusing me specifically of being bias? My initial thought on the first part you quoted and commented on was a general statement. But then the second quote and comment appears as if you are saying I specifically am.

Nah....nothing worth texting there lo. thank you, you have a great day as well. Slow cooking a pork tenderloin on my Traeger for dinner. It’s gonna be great.

You're funny

Look...another conspiracy theory. Or it could just simply be friends texting each other. But your version sounds much better.