The goal of these arguments is to get the big bad schools out of their favorite schools tournament. I'm reminded of an article I read in the (Johnson County) Daily Journal the year before 6A was formed. CG had just beaten Whiteland and the article lamented the fact that they were in the same division. At the time Whiteland was around 1800 and CG around 2300. The article claimed there was no way Whiteland should have to compete against a school that was so much bigger. There was no mention of the fact that CG would still have to compete against schools with 2000 more students than CG. That didn't matter. What mattered to the author was getting CG out of Whiteland's way. I think that is what is being repeated here.
I think the biggest advantage comes from being able to control enrollment and not having your hallways filled with kids who don't participate in extra-curriculars.
So if it is split in half (again) you are left with 2600-5400. Other than taking the biggest schools out of your team's division does that fix anything?
Per the IHSAA Center Grove is 17th in enrollment. While I think your idea is a bad one, at least put my Trojans where they belong.
https://ihsaa.org/Portals/0/ihsaa/documents/quick resources/Enrollments & Classifications/football schools 19-20.pdf
1. Possibly. I'd be curious to hear how many schools lose good players to jobs.
2. Okay. Most camps and clinics are BS but there are benefits to be had in the right programs.
3. Maybe. I have heard there are other MIC schools in lower socioeconomic areas that have coaches who don't have to teach. That's not the case at CG.
4. Granted, but I'm not sure that is high on the list of attributes college recruiters are seeking.
5. That's a silly comment. I granted the better facilities and equipment in my post that you quoted.
You caught us. It's a great strategy. Take your 4,000 yard rusher, park him all season, then bring him out in the regional championship game. Pretty crafty, eh?