Warriorfan

I guess your ridiculous antics keep you from admitting when you have been proven wrong and i should have know that with you lack of intellect you would not have a sense of humor either. Have fun being ignorant.

Look up Michigan City football Oh by the way they are the Wolves as well, You can google earth the field they play on (AMES Field) take a look at the east end zone but then again maybe aliens came down and repainted the field or the have control of all satellite images. As entertaining as this has been, arguing with a fool like you does get old after a while. Once you look at the Michigan City football field go ahead and offer to run up there and paint the field for them since you want it to be miss spelled as well.

I can keep going with hundreds more. Maybe you should admit you're wrong and be done.

You are a new level of ignorant, not sure why i am wasting my time.

GO TO THE SCHOOLS WEBSITE IDIOT ITS WOLVES AND IT IS THE CORRECT PRONUNCIATION. THE OTHER BUSINESSES YOU LISTED ARE PROPER NAMES THAT CAN HAVE ANY SPELLING

Who said I played for Rockville?? What is amazing is that everyone else in the world pronounces the plural of Wolf as Wolves except you. So they are all wrong and you are right. Very interesting. John Bagnall, Wordsmith & occasional lecturer on media writing skills. Answered May 2, 2018 · Author has 497 answers and 2.7m answer views The plural of “wolf” is “wolves”. The same way of forming the plural applies to many other words that end, when singular, with an “f”. But it’s most certainly NOT a universal rule. There are a great many other English words ending in “f”, commonplace as well as esoteric, to which you simply need to add an “s” to form the plural. Roof/roofs, reef/reefs, proof/proofs, coif/coifs, turf/turfs, brief/briefs, chief/chiefs, and so on.

Do yourself a favor and do some fact checking or better yet take a poll on the GID of who thinks "WOLFS" is correct. WOW i am absolutely amazed at your lack of command of the English language. Even further do some research and see just how many shcools there are out there who use the mascot "WOLVES"

I would guess yours isn't functioning properly. Maybe John Harrell has the team name wrong or even the school itself (which i have relatives attending), AND I am pretty sure the shirt they bought me to wear has printed on it that they are the WOLVES not wolfs. But hey if you want to change the Websters dictionary pronunciation and also pay for the change of the name on the schools uniforms and everything else. You go right ahead.

Its the Plural pronunciation MORON do you own a dictionary

Parke Heritage WOLVES

They defeated a 3-28 team over the last three years who they beat the year before as well.

I understand your point i just disagree with what you think. You can word it any way you want. I don't like the rule, and i don't think that its only a few occasions where it hurts a team, i think the fact its used at all is counter productive. MY opinion. I don't like the idea of a gentler kinder approach. You can call me heartless or uncaring or blind to the injury problem, i don't feel like i am any of those things. I simply do not think the rule is good for football. I Understood the intent of your post, I don't agree with it.

Two faces but three names?????

I have coached a team that had been down 30 and we fought back and lost by 4 we were not demoralized, we put the ball on the ground 4 times lost them all and threw a pick that led to a score. Just because a team has given up points doesn't mean they are ready to give up. That's a poor philosophy that I would never espouse in a team. Give up if you want ill coach to keep trying in the face of even extreme adversity.

Its been my experience on the sideline that when a team is getting beat and a running clock was used, they lost a good portion of their competitive spirit. I understand your point but be it starters looking for cheap points against the winning teams 2nds and 3rds or it the jv of the losing team, they still seem demoralized knowing they have went to a running clock.

I can see both sides of this issue but I am sure some would agree that it does send a message that if you are down that far there is no use in continuing to play hard since the clock is now against you as well.

Seeger's run defense was "OK" against a team that does not run the ball real well especially since they have an almost completely new O-line. I did not see much improvement out of the Seeger team. May be a little early to say that PH looked great or that Seeger is terrible but i'm sure it looked that way to some. PH looks pretty good but may be a little weak on the edges defensively. Any team that can throw the ball well may present some problems for the Wolves.

I would call Brian Moore a legendary coach but not Herb King. Year in and out Seeger was extremely well coached and very dominant, I cant put Rockville under King in the same category. I would also disagree that they would call it a truly competitive conference. I have spoke with both on several occasions on this very topic and both have said on different occasions that the conference was lacking in consistent competition. Yes Seeger under Moore was solid and very successful and Rockville had some success as did Fountain Central for a period and Now North Vermillion is experiencing some success, but when you look at the conference across the board there are several teams that go many years without being successful. That's where they lack competition you will have in any year usually two team that are dominant a couple more that play well and the lower tier that struggles. This is common in other conferences also but when this happens often it limits competition.

All of the schools I had been a head coach or on staff for had money allocated for at least two or three and most of the time for all assistants listed by the school associated with the team. It is true the larger the program the more money is available for coaching pay. It is pretty rare to hear of a school only paying for a head coach and no assistants from my experience.

The tournament has only been around for 46 years and looking at something from a 19 year period may not be the best way to look at consistency, and I understand your point, but as an example the North Vermillion team that went last year in my opinion while good in the WRC was not the second best team in the state. Im sure many would say that no other team would have challenged Pioneer but I would disagree. Sometimes a team does make it through a little easier path by the way the tournament is seeded and you have great teams beat each other up before they make it deep. I Played in the conference myself, and I felt like we had some good teams but I was also fortunate enough to play at the second level and I can tell you that when a team makes it deep in the tournament, people have a tendency to think that we are a highly competitive conference. All I am saying is that while we have had some success we are not what many would call a FOOTBALL conference. I love the WRC but I also know it is not as competitive as the people in Parke, Vermillion, Warren and Fountain counties think. I will continue to cheer for the team/s that I have had experience with and I will root for any WRC team that goes deep, I just don't think we should over estimate the WRC.

Sounds good to me

It is an invaluable tool for coaches not only in terms of scout films but a teaching tool for the team itself. It shows the game from a completely different perspective and from the standpoint of blocking schemes and assignments it is very informative.