Muda69 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 13 minutes ago, Frozen Tundra said: @Muda69 I’ve got a question for you. As a lifelong fan of professional wrestling, I’m curious about something. Are you a gimmick? Specifically, are you a schtick whose whole purpose for being on this site is to be a contrarian and challenge the status quo/groupthink, or do you really believe the things you say on here? I’ll hang up and listen. I watched professional wrestling as a child, but quickly lost interest in it. No, I am not a gimmick. Somebody here needs to challenge the status quo/groupthink that tends to permeate forums such as these, or it quickly becomes stale and dies. If that makes me a contrarian then so be it. The late Tim Adams, founder of the GID, recognized this and championed it. 1 Quote
Frozen Tundra Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Muda69 said: No, I am not a gimmick. Somebody here needs to challenge the status quo/groupthink that tends to permeate forums such as these, or it quickly becomes stale and dies. If that makes me a contrarian then so be it. I would argue that if you take it upon yourself to challenge the status quo/groupthink then that makes it a role you play (i.e. a gimmick) and not your natural thoughts. Quote
Muda69 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 8 minutes ago, hhpatriot04 said: I'd be in favor of a 0.75 multiplier for co-op classifications. (School 1 Enrollment + School 2 Enrollment) * 0.75 Why? What inherent advantages would two schools co-opting have to justify such an enrollment multiplier? Just now, Frozen Tundra said: I would argue that if you take it upon yourself to challenge the status quo/groupthink then that makes it a role you play (i.e. a gimmick) and not your natural thoughts. Well, we will just have to agree to disagree. Quote
hhpatriot04 Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, Muda69 said: Why? What inherent advantages would two schools co-opting have to justify such an enrollment multiplier? Inherent *dis*advantages. The multiplier would reduce their combined enrollment by 25 percent. I think that's fair given the disadvantages like coordination, transportation, logistics, management, etc.. Averaging the two schools' enrollments is too much of an advantage. This meets it in the middle. Quote
Coach Nowlin Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 23 minutes ago, CoachDurham said: In this situation or any. What is the incentive to agreeing to Co-Op with us? Even if you took South Newton and say Tri-County. 2 Struggling 1A schools enrollment and roster size. You would get an enrollment similar to Rensselaer and become 2A. and have 30 kids total if everyone played. From my perspective: NONE Quote
Frozen Tundra Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Muda69 said: Well, we will just have to agree to disagree. Fair enough. I ask because I like to debate and play the role of devil’s advocate when it comes to politics and religion. Personally, I think too many people can’t handle differing opinions about things, especially those two topics. By playing my “gimmick”, I try to get them to see another side to it while I also strive to understand their views/arguments. It may not change their opinion, or mine, but the goal is to at least get them (and myself) a better understanding of other viewpoints and to realize there are good people that believe other things than you. In summation, I call it a gimmick. You don’t. Potayto, potahto. Quote
Coach Nowlin Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 15 minutes ago, Muda69 said: I watched professional wrestling as a child, but quickly lost interest in it. No, I am not a gimmick. Somebody here needs to challenge the status quo/groupthink that tends to permeate forums such as these, or it quickly becomes stale and dies. If that makes me a contrarian then so be it. The late Tim Adams, founder of the GID, recognized this and championed it. and I support as well as you know: 1 Quote
justafootballguy Posted 34 minutes ago Posted 34 minutes ago 43 minutes ago, Muda69 said: I watched professional wrestling as a child, but quickly lost interest in it. No, I am not a gimmick. Somebody here needs to challenge the status quo/groupthink that tends to permeate forums such as these, or it quickly becomes stale and dies. If that makes me a contrarian then so be it. The late Tim Adams, founder of the GID, recognized this and championed it. It says Rossville....How would you feel if they wanted to start football but they wanted to go 8 man and that was the BEST option for the school?? Would you support that? 43 minutes ago, Muda69 said: Quote
Muda69 Posted 4 minutes ago Posted 4 minutes ago 1 hour ago, hhpatriot04 said: Inherent *dis*advantages. The multiplier would reduce their combined enrollment by 25 percent. I think that's fair given the disadvantages like coordination, transportation, logistics, management, etc.. Averaging the two schools' enrollments is too much of an advantage. This meets it in the middle. Ahh, thank you. My mistake. Quote
Muda69 Posted just now Posted just now 32 minutes ago, justafootballguy said: It says Rossville....How would you feel if they wanted to start football but they wanted to go 8 man and that was the BEST option for the school?? Would you support that? No, not when a co-op arrangement with Clinton Central to the East or heck, Faith Christian to the West, makes the superior 11-man man game another best option. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.