Muda69 Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 https://reason.com/2021/03/17/texas-senators-want-sports-teams-to-shut-up-and-play-the-anthem/ Quote The culture clash over the national anthem and kneeling has largely stayed away from actual lawmaking, until now. Ten Texas state senators introduced a bill this month, Senate Bill (S.B.) 4, that would require pro sports teams to play the national anthem at the beginning of each preseason, regular season, and postseason game hosted in Texas. It bars governmental entities at the state and local levels from entering agreements with sports teams that require a financial commitment unless the agreement includes written verification the team will play the anthem before all games. If a team fails to comply, it would be in default of the agreement. The bill didn't come out of the blue. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) vowed to introduce a bill back in February when it was reported that the Dallas Mavericks hadn't been playing the anthem before their games. For 13 preseason and regular-season home games, team owner Mark Cuban decided to skip the national anthem, and it took a while for anybody to notice (perhaps because fans were only present for the last of those games). Following reports about Cuban's decision, the NBA announced that with fans coming back into arenas, it would once again enforce its longstanding rule requiring the anthem before games. "We respect and always have respected the passion people have for the anthem and our country," Cuban said. "But we also loudly hear the voices of those who feel that the anthem does not represent them." Presumably, if this bill became law and a major sports league actually allowed a team to stop playing the national anthem (which seems a bit unlikely if even the NBA is still requiring it), it would affect stadium subsidies, any kind of government-funded tourism sponsorship, and possibly even arrangements where local law enforcement provides security. However, the bill would likely not stand up to judicial scrutiny. "As a private organization, the NBA may legally require its teams to play the national anthem before games. Those teams cannot claim such an action violates their free expression rights," Amy Kristin Sanders, an attorney and a professor at the University of Texas Austin School of Journalism, told Law&Crime. "But Patrick's proposal that the Texas Legislature pass a state law requiring the national anthem be played represents state action. As a part of its speech protections, the First Amendment also bars state actors from compelling others to speak—and requiring someone to play the national anthem is just that." In late February, several Tennessee legislators attempted to infringe on the speech rights of athletes via a different route. Those legislators wrote a letter to the state's public university presidents and chancellors asking them to prohibit student-athletes from kneeling during the national anthem. But, as Reason's Robby Soave wrote, "if the university could force student-athletes to stand for the national anthem, then it could force any student to do so—and this would obviously be unconstitutional." The 10 Texas senators who authored S.B. 4 (nine Republicans and one Democrat) make up nearly one-third of the chamber. Hopefully, their colleagues recognize the First Amendment supersedes scoring political points. Wow, you would think our elected representative at any level understand what the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution actually means. Yet here we have these Texas lawmakers trying to pass a law "compelling others to speak" and frankly manufacturing faux-patriotism at Texas professional sporting events. Sickening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobref Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 27 minutes ago, Muda69 said: https://reason.com/2021/03/17/texas-senators-want-sports-teams-to-shut-up-and-play-the-anthem/ Wow, you would think our elected representative at any level understand what the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution actually means. Yet here we have these Texas lawmakers trying to pass a law "compelling others to speak" and frankly manufacturing faux-patriotism at Texas professional sporting events. Sickening. We see this all the time in Indiana, most frequently on the abortion issue. Legislators introduce, and sometimes even pass, legislation that has no hope of withstanding constitutional scrutiny. They’re just doing it to pander to a particular constituency. But all they accomplish is costing the state big bucks to have their attorney general try to defend the indefensible in court ... and they contribute to the public’s general misunderstanding of the Constitution. After all, the public is going to assume that legislators wouldn’t knowingly pass laws that can’t be enforced, would they? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gipper Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 Isn't the purpose of the anthem is to "honor America"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muda69 Posted March 18, 2021 Author Share Posted March 18, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Gipper said: Isn't the purpose of the anthem is to "honor America"? That depends on who you ask. Edited March 18, 2021 by Muda69 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobref Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 3 hours ago, Gipper said: Isn't the purpose of the anthem is to "honor America"? What’s that got to do with anything? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gipper Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 55 minutes ago, Bobref said: What’s that got to do with anything? Forget it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.