scarab527

Currently on the Region Sports board he's on one thread posing as three different people having conversations with himself.

Was unaware. But you're questioning my integrity when you yourself are completely biased in the situation, which is frankly wildly hypocritical, and that hypocrisy should be exposed. If you had any integrity you would've stated this 'full disclosure' for all to see, instead of trying to act like what I'm saying isn't 100% true.

Because you're not totally biased in this situation, lol. What I'm saying is the truth, cope.

Alt is probably gone by 9 but would be nice, even if Jones and Wright are solid. I think Odunze would be great as imo he would fit nicely with their current group of receivers as a big-bodied possession type. I also still think DE should be on the table as they need someone to pair with Sweat. Trading down shouldn't be out of the question either if their top guys are already off the board, pairing Bowers with Kmet in that scenario would be interesting. The good thing is they've got many different options and routes to go with that pick.

McCarthy strikes me more like the guy a GM drafts and gets fired over a couple years later. Maybe I'm wrong, but I just don't see it. Game manager at best imo, and there's nothing wrong with that, but Cam Newton was right when he said teams are looking to draft the next Lamar, Allen or Mahomes, not the next Tua, Dak, or Goff.

That's rich. "The things you have directly been told by coaches on multiple different coaching staffs didn't happen". It's ok Bob, I know it's very difficult for you to accept, but you're not always right about things.

Well, seeing as other coaches around the area agree with me, it must not be 'totally' inaccurate.

If you saw the behavior of their fans and their coaches you’d understand why. This goes back to their time in the GSSC.

Harrell's website shows that Lowell is still playing LaPorte in Week 2.

As I’ve said before, the IHSAA knows the only way to justify the all-in is to have the random draw. Any seeding, or even putting the top 2 teams on opposites of the bracket, will eventually have people calling for a qualifier once enough complete blowouts happen in Round 1.

I wasn’t impressed with Getsy myself, but the question that needs to be raised is how much he was handicapped in his play calling by Fields’ shortcomings as a passer.

The whole Fields discourse has really brought out the fact that most people watching do not actually know anything about football. He ran the same offense for two years in a row and did not improve even slightly (in the QB-friendly Shanahan system, I might add). The OL discourse is mute because sacks are mostly a QB stat (something most people just can’t seem to wrap their head around), driven home even more so by the fact that Bagent had about half the sack rate in 5 games playing behind the exact same OL. Pretty telling that Nagy and Getsy also both got jobs immediately after they left. All advanced passing stats say that he was a bottom 5 QB in the NFL this year.

I wish the kid the best, but don’t hold your breath on this…

As someone in the Region once told me: "The most important thing for people at LC football games is the band" As for why program isn't good, without going into hearsay too much, it starts at the top.

Seeding is the first step in the removal of the all-in. A couple years of complete first round blowouts where one team has to travel 1 hour+ will have people ready for a qualifier. The all-in only makes sense with the random draw.