Irishman

Yeah....so a guy who gives the sit and spin reaction is amused? yeah ok.......like I said Saturday; you're funny.

Awwwwww look at the cute little threesome we have going here. lol Get upset because someone called someone out on a post; and turn right around to do the exact same thing. It's adorable really.

Sure seems like you show bias in who you choose to call out and who you don't call out.....and at this point, I would even add who you choose to defend......interesting lol

https://variety.com/2020/tv/news/ken-osmond-dead-leave-it-to-beaver-eddie-haskell-dies-actor-1234609639/ 😢

They have their junior high teams, but Metro still plays games there. The PE classes from both Harding and EAU could use it more as well.

Yes, all of EACS is.....Heritage, Leo and Woodlan. Heritage actually rebuilt a lot of their stadium as well. They have new home bleachers and pressbox. I believe they have lockers at the stadium as well now. I still contend that with all the activity that Harding still sees, it should have been installed there as well.

We had this discussion in our coaches office a couple seasons ago. It is crazy to think about how quickly we have gone to playing a couple games on turf to now where we will be playing most games on turf. In our conference, the only schools I have not heard that is adding turf are Bellmont and Hunting North......unless I missed something. We do play at Garrett this year, but this is just a home and home contract.

I guess you cannot let go of inserting yourself into the discussion. You want to call someone out in accurately, then be prepared for the responses. So NOW you decide to insert the terms “recent history” and “last few days”? Ok funny, but ok Libtard does not set me off at all. I described it perfectly in a previous post. It is simply intellectually lazy. You are correct, he is not the only one that has posted something that could be offensive. Are you going to own your own role in that?

I am not EVEN talking about that. Your comment that I referred to for proof was the one where you claimed that the 77 members of your family combined with the 999 other people that work in the plant you do know no one who has contracted the virus. You admitted you did not talk to every one of those people prior to making the claim. I simply challenged the accuracy of the comment.

Yet here you are arguing.....I simply called him out on a claim that he made. He decided to press the issue, so I continued to show how ridiculous it was. Sure there are other posts that qualify as offensive. I typically tend to avoid the ones that are back and forth between individuals. If anyone is willing to post here, then they should be prepared for any backlash for doing so. No one else repeatedly uses a term that equals libtards throughout his posting here, especially in reference to other posters here. Occasional name calling? Yep, but nothing close to what he does here. So I have never called muda out on his posts? Yeah ok lol Or DT on the main forum? hmmmmm....selective memory or just bias on your part? Or did you choose to enter this discussion because you and Howe are on the same side of the fence? Or maybe most posters here are reasonable enough they don’t need to be called out for such an abrasive style?

You have provided the “proof” yourself. The claim you made was plain nonsense and pure conjecture on your part, but offered as fact. The proof was in your own words. I support or add interference for one side huh? And I guess you present a fair and equal amount of criticism for both sides, I guess? lol....hilarious. I can prove that just in the last week, and throughout my time, I have been critical of both sides. But because I am critical of the President, the one you so blindly support, you only see one side.

To say Howe’s posts are not unique may show your bias? Maybe your selective memory sees a bias that isn’t there? I have called others out on posting style. This has just been the most recent. My personal views of Trump are no different than my views of Biden, so that is not factoring into it. But somebody that regularly calls out or makes fun of others for their blind loyalty/allegiance to a person, group, or way of thinking, while ignoring it in himself deserves to be called out on his bs, especially when the claims like the ones he made that started this recent exchange were just ridiculous. I will say this though, and give him credit for it as well......while the conversation had two distinct views in a conversation, neither of us allowed it to devolve into childish name calling. 🙂

To clarify, are you accusing me specifically of being bias? My initial thought on the first part you quoted and commented on was a general statement. But then the second quote and comment appears as if you are saying I specifically am.

Nah....nothing worth texting there lo. thank you, you have a great day as well. Slow cooking a pork tenderloin on my Traeger for dinner. It’s gonna be great.

You're funny

Look...another conspiracy theory. Or it could just simply be friends texting each other. But your version sounds much better.

True......but maybe if you did not spend so much time and energy belittling those whom you do not agree with politically, you would not get the kind of scrutiny of what you post that you do. Countless times you use terms like libtard, accuse those on the left here of being sheep, and in general have a tone where even those that support your positions will roll their eyes. One of them texted me the other day and said yeah, use of the term libtard so much is just intellectually lazy. Look, no one is perfect; we all make mistakes. I have posted things I should not have; gotten facts wrong; we all do it. Your flat denial to see it for what it is, is what has made this exchange as entertaining as it has been.

Your plant is in central Indiana, right? Most of your family in the same area? You can only use the numbers in the areas where the people you referred to live and work. If everyone you mentioned lived in Indy, then including stats from say Clinton County or Whitley County would not be relevant to the discussion. It still does not changed a thing about the points I made. You just cannot get over the fact that you made assumptions when you made your comments, and continue to do so. Making assumptions about what people know, especially a group as large as the one you did, without knowing for certain.....well some would call that fake news; hence the hilarity of the irony. You, the KING of posting about fake news, in fact did post fake news yourself.........oh the humanit....I mean hypocrisy. lol

Yep...beer drinkers of the world unite! or Irish Whisky drinkers too

Personally? One I do know. The other, I know enough of to reach the conclusion I did. Social media has been pretty cool as far as connecting with people I would have never encountered outside of it. It would be fun to sit down with those guys and throw a few pints back.

It probably would not matter to know that I know enough about both individuals to know beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are not the same person. Have to admit the conspiracy about Tom Hanks being dead is almost as entertaining as this one.

Always room for one more conspiracy theory, right? lol

Yes I do know that, but as other posts I made mention, the consistency of the ip address that shows up in posts and the location of it lead me to think they are two separate people.

All the more reason to be suspicious. 🤣No one would ever suspect a thing.