Howe

On second thought, what is the purpose of points 1, 2 & 4 ? Point 3 is a wild and baseless conspiracy theory which has absolutely no correlation with points 1,2 & 4 whatsoever.

"Not sure if it's true..." AND "I have yet to verify..." are typical for conspiracy theories.

Understood. A moderator quotes and references a video, then posts a conspiracy theory and links an article. The video and article do not support the conspiracy theory.

Who is wrong? 1. Muda posts a video of IMPD beating a female citizen 2. GID moderator quotes and references said video 3. GID moderator posts "From North Carolina: Interesting comment though. Not sure if it is true, but someone claiming to be from there said these were not police at all, but militia members dressed similar to police to avoid being attacked or arrested. I have not verified that, but there are similar stories from other cities". 4. GID moderator links article about police destroying water bottles in Ashville, NC. What was the purpose of 1 & 2 ?

It is interesting that a moderator would quote and reference a video of IMPD beating a female citizen with clubs and then post those comments. What was the purpose of quoting and referencing the video?

Irishman linked a published article. It was not a video.

Muda posted a video of IMPD beating a female citizen with clubs for no apparent reason. You posted a comment referencing the video and stated they could be "militia dressed similar to police" and linked an article. I expected the article to support your statement.

This is similar to the countless Russia hoax articles posted. Neither article provides evidence of either left or right wing extremists instigating the riots. Both simply reference opinions of others. The LA Times article did state the FBI had a signed affidavit on Mathew Ruppert yet did not indicate whether he was a left wing or right wing instigator.

The article made no mention of "militia dressed similar to police". I have no idea where you came up with such an accusation. I attempted to search the comments section of the article to no avail.

Please explain the statement. The article linked does not mention "militia dressed similar to police".

Post the evidence.

Right wing Young Turks commentator ridiculing "some crackpot conspiracy theory" from right wing MSNBC host Rachel Maddow.

There has been little evidence to support either left or right wing agitators are instigating the riots.

Both you and I are simply stating opinions. Neither one of us has evidence to support our opinions. I do not need to pat myself on the back. It is a verifiable fact that my opinions have been more accurate than the GID lefties on a variety of subjects during the past three years.

I believe the left are the primary instigators of the riots while you and other lefties believe the right are the primary instigators. At this point neither side has much evidence to support our opinions. The GID lefties were strong supporters of the Russia hoax and Mueller Dossier. Countless articles were posted on this forum referencing anonymous sources and assessments. After three years it has been determined there was not a single shred of evidence anyone associated with Trump colluded with the Russians, no evidence the Russians hacked the DNC servers and no person in U.S. judicial history has ever been exonerated by the prosecution. It has been determined the Hydroxychloroquine study published in the Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine was based on a hoax. My opinions have been proven to be much more accurate than most of the GID lefties.

Russia was the most popular subject of GID lefties for nearly two and a half years until the entire hoax and Mueller Dossier imploded. Regardless of whether people watch the video's, a GID moderator has made a false and inaccurate statement regarding a forum member.

Perhaps because you are supposed to be a moderator instead of a partisan.

That is an inaccurate statement. I posted two video's last week referencing neither left or right wing agitators. Democrats and former Obama National Security Advisor, Susan Rice claim responsibility actually lies with the Russians.

I know exactly what the "protests" are about. Muda posted a meme and a video which perfectly explains the purpose of the riots and looting.

Agreed. It is also interesting how "protests" against racism have resulted in the deaths of five blacks and three Hispanics across America. .

Interesting to discover George Floyd had served five separate prison sentences including one for a home invasion. The defense will certainly use this information and the official autopsy during the trials.

The Lancet retracts and withdraws fake Hydroxychloroquine study. Dr. Fauci supported the fake study last week. Dr. Fauci hasn't said a word since the fake Hydroxychloroquine study has been retracted and withdrawn. The New England Journal of Medicine also published information from the same source. A company no one in the medical community is familiar with - Surgisphere.

Dr. Birx has stated "I cannot trust anything coming from the CDC" and "the CDC is inflating coronavirus statistics by as much as 25 percent". More than one newspaper had stated deaths are attributed to COVID-19 although the people had never been tested. Trump was once again correct when he stated "The Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus, that is their new hoax".