Bazinga, Mr. P.
So I take it by your witty comeback, that you completely missed it. Got it.
Now back to your daily "take my ball and go home" rants. Oh wait, that will only last a few minutes. 😉
How come you don't have Greenwood contract, Mr. P.? They could then be absorbed into Center Grove and be called Center Greengrove Wood Trojanman and Trojanwoman (for you that get triggggggered by pronouns).
Enrollment of 3,700. UNSTOPPABLE!
🙂
As most of us know, that is not very common now a days.
I too fall into that trap from time to time. I want the advancement NOW. Then I realize by talking, working, studying, analyzing, etc., that in a certain sport, I still need more time.
I bolded dictate b/c I do not think anyone wants their choices to be dictated by someone else. I hope that makes sense.
That is why I didn't answer that part.
Would I like it if only the same 10 crews rotated through the finals? If they are rated the best (which I guess would be a different discussion) than I would have no problem with it. I would work harder to break into one of those crews.
I do understand what you are saying Bob. As an entire, I see how that can deter folks from wanting to continue to officiate (which I would question do they REALLY want to put all the work in to be the best?)
Good discussion guys. Thanks.
GREAT information. Thank you. I thought she did fine Sunday. Only noticed her twice. The delayed false start call on Hill (KC) and the potential interception by David (TB). I did ask @Bobrefa question about why the LJs changed. Had never noticed that before.
As I said, there are many fantastic officials in all walks of life, but to "advance" people because of their gender, skin color, whatever, and not their merits and hard work, is very wrong.