temptation

Brownsburg Carmel New Palestine Westfield Fishers Lawrence North Indianapolis Cathedral Center Grove Crown Point Decatur Central Warren Central Bishop Chatard Lafayette Jefferson Hamilton Southeastern Lawrence Central East Noble Carroll (Fort Wayne) Avon Penn Bloomington South Franklin Central Merrillville Gibson Southern Heritage Hills Roncalli

Did CG at least hit harder?

Here we go…

Kinda.

Stop, lol.

Anybody with the data to support my notion that this award just goes to the state’s highest rated skill player by the recruiting services?

It’s stale.

Will you two get a room?

26. Carroll (Fort Wayne) 27. Homestead 28. Mishawaka 29. Zionsville 30. East Central 31. Bloomington South 32. Concord 33. Ben Davis 34. Plainfield 35. Leo 36. Evansville Memorial 37. Columbus North 38. Lowell 39. Castle 40. Evansville Reitz 41. Warsaw 42. Whiteland 43. Andrean 44. Yorktown 45. Hobart 46. Pendleton Heights 47. Floyd Central 48. South Bend St. Joseph's 49. Jasper 50. Lebanon

I’ll default you as the expert but Trinity putting it on Carmel means they are either severely underrated or Brownsburg is severely underrated.

Start at CG and once they get up 17, head to Columbus?

Can’t get a read on it. Should be more competitive than the three games above. The state needs a good Bloomington South as 5A is pretty pathetic.

31-14 CG 28-14 LN 48-14 Carmel

So angry.

Don’t insult CNN now, no need for them to catch strays.

Intrigued by this one against Columbus North. Quite a disparity between Temp's top 25 and other polls when it comes to the Panthers.

Cathedral/CG

CG and LN own Warren.

Take a drive from downtown Indy down US-40 east to Cumberland...

I mean, I can use the same excel link provided above. In 2006 (the farthest back the online DOE data goes), Warren had a 29% FRL rate. So its doubled.

Warren Central 20-25 years ago was MUCH different than Warren Central today.

I think your Warren/BD numbers are wrong.

Disagree that it would be that simple.

Good stuff. So those outliers truly are top dog when it comes to pound for pound. Maybe we can even incorporate a formula that calculate SOS, W/L record and FRL to get an even more accurate picture.

Anyone doubting the impact of socioeconomics is either lost or is purposely leaving their head in the sand. I’ll once again repeat the line that I have stated on this forum for years… “If you’re going to be at a socioeconomic disadvantage, you better have an enrollment advantage.”