btownqbcoach1

I'm shocked he made the thread about him. 🤪 No one cares what taxes you have to pay lol

Cheap. Smart to do baseball and softball, too.

Awesome! They were REALLY good last year. I'll put them on the list.

Pigs waller around in their own s*** all day, bet you like bacon and pork chops? 🤪

Millers Tavern fish sammy is better than their tenderloin. There I said it.

The week, exactly, I am not sure.

Tell City at home this year, and next year they will pick up Clarksville.

Just strictly speaking "gyms"... gyms only. I'd take Paoli well before WW, and I have not been to the new Mitchell gym, but the old Mitchell gym-- Paoli would still be ahead of them for me. Sidenote- I would also take Paoli's gym over BC's, just showing it's not a bias thing. Love that gym.

Never forget Oscar! Great name!

lol

That's exactly what it sounds like

As you should be. In HS sports, everyone should make the post-season, I can't imagine thinking otherwise. Your perspective sounds like that of a fan. Nothing wrong with that, but I have never heard of a coach calling any regular season and exhibition. I've also never really heard of any energy in coaching circles to get the "all-in" approach changed. We'd like seeding-- but I don't think any of us really want teams excluded.

They aren't, at all. Maybe from a fan's perspective? Idk hard to see where you're coming from with any of this, or have any energy towards some teams not getting in the tourney and that being a good thing for the sport. It's definitely meaningful--- how do you think we get prepared for the tourney? There, that refuted your alleged "fact"..... lol

Who's handing out trophies now? Why play the regular season? Well because it's fun? ... kids enjoy it? children create life-long experiences/memories? children learn a lot from their athletic experience? I could list the reasons for a while. There is no one being cheated. Who cares whether they play 3 weeks earlier? Again, semantics. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- I can't actually believe I am reading people say a football game is meaningless. Go watch Columbus East/North play--- tell me how meaningless it is. Brownstown/Seymour. Lawrenceburg East Central. Every Evansville game lol Meaningless if you aren't a competitor, I guess. Man, that's a tough sell... games are meaningless because everyone gets into a state tourney? That's wild and sort of soft, not going to lie.

Is #4 in question? #3 is a GREAT idea. I love it.

That doesn't even match up. I said seed the sectionals. My god it's HS football, not college or the pros. None of these teams are getting cheated. Ben Davis and Brownsburg are 8 mins apart.. I mean, of course, they play a lot in the sectional?

In your opinion, in my opinion every kid that plays HS football should get to play in the sectional. I don't really see any watered-downness. Seems like semantics to me, honestly. To each their own, but I see no way it's going to change. There is nothing to support. Not allowing children to play a child's game is just ....not the route I'm going to vote for... ever. It's really not all that difficult to understand. More kids should get the opportunity to enjoy a post-season football game--you guys will be fine in the meantime, I promise. Calling 9 games of regular season practice games is a non-starter for me. Take your conversation up with someone else, it isn't changing. Your need for added incentive is absurd, honestly.

That's a bit of a dramatic take. But sure, man. By not allowing every team in, we gain nothing. We aren't better off by not allowing teams in. I'd seed the top 2 teams using the Sagarin and blind draw the rest. Only changes I would like to see.

Do you even have an example of a team losing every game by 50 points? I'm still failing to see what you gain, the regular season always matters, it literally prepares you for the tourney. But the bottom line---- Every kid should be able to play in the sectional and that's not going to change, no real sense in entertaining the idea.

Well-- yes, it does. I would argue you have 10% more fun 😉 and yes, imo, it is worth it. But-- they still get 40 reps or so even in an intrasquad scrimmage.

I don't think that is true. And to your last sentence-- at camp we get 4 whole practices against other teams. It was all filmed-- counting 7 on 7 reps+11 on 11 reps-- We were probably around 300-350 reps against other teams. That doesn't count our other 2 competition days. Now-- I would also be fine with keeping the scrimmage against an opponent in week 1 of regular practice and eliminating the intrasquad scrimmage, that's fine with me.

@BTF what was your confusion? Big fan of scrimmages?

I can't entertain the idea of "not everyone gets in the playoffs". One I don't think we'll ever see that happen here and two... I think all kids should get to play in the sectional. I don't think we accomplish anything by not allowing certain teams in.

I do too, taking out one of the scrimmages is the best route to do that, imo.

Not feasible.