Jump to content
Head Coach Openings 2024 ×

US31

Coach
  • Posts

    366
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by US31

  1. 3 minutes ago, BTF said:

    I think they did a good job with 6A North all things considered. Two sectionals comprise teams from the same general area. The other two are 3/1. Homestead is to Indy as Elkhart is to Fort Wayne. I'm not sure how they could have done it any better. 

    Putting Harrison into Sectional 1 would have shifted another FW school to Indy. You would have two FW schools vs two Indy schools. Two SB schools vs two FW schools. From a fans perspective, that's what I was personally hoping for. But geographically, I can see why the IHSAA did what they did. 

    Although 2 FtW/2Hamco schools is exactly what it was.

    • Like 1
  2. 1 hour ago, NLCTigerFan07 said:

    A few head scratchers per usual that I do not think many on this forum called out as possibilities

    6A

    Throwing Penn into Sectional 1 as opposed to having Harrison (West Lafayette) just take Lafayette Jeff's place (who moved to 5A), and then leaving Homestead on an island in Fort Wayne with 3 Hamilton County schools is interesting.

    5A

    There was always going to be an oddball in Sectional 12 with Kokomo, Lafayette Jeff, and McCutcheon, but I can't say anyone predicted it would be South Bend Adams. I figured it would be Fort Wayne North Side or even Warsaw.

    The 6A "shift" is the oddest one to me....Harrison for Jeff, Snider for Warsaw, and everything else is basically status quo, this was apprently not what the IHSAA had in mind

    5A makes sense to me as I fell IHSAA has always viewed Warsaw as "Fr Wayne adjacent" 😜

    • Like 1
  3.  

    https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/high-school/2024/04/26/girls-wrestling-boys-volleyball-proposed-as-recognized-sports-by-ihsaa/73438427007/

    FTA 

    Stacey Brewer, the principal at Yorktown, submitted a proposal to address the change that has been made to the one-game regional and two-game semistate and how it relates to the tournament success factor.

    As it stands, if a school is moved up a class via the tournament success factor, it must earn three points (a regional championship is worth two points, a sectional one) during a two-year period to stay up (that was changed from two points last year). Under Brewer’s proposal, another point would be added, meaning a school would have to accumulate four points during a two-year period to remain up a class.

    The straw poll at Plainfield showed just 15 in favor and 52 opposed to that change. (my emphasis)

    Thoughts?  The 1 Game Regional, 2 Game Semistate, comment applies to basketball only?  Doesn't look like it got much traction, but seems to be a desire by some to make it "harder" for teams to "stay up"?

     

  4. 18 hours ago, BTF said:

    That would mean 16 of 32 (possible). Furthermore, mid pack "at best" would imply 16-24 (hardly). I've got Carroll in that 8-12 range. We'll never know. What we do know is that four through sixteen is a crapshoot. Carroll had a good football team. They could beat anyone not named Brownsburg, Ben Davis, or Center Grove on any given night. Unfortunately though, they'll be remembered for the Warsaw game and not the battles they had with Snider, Hamilton Southeastern, and Warren Central. 

    I had to check this....Sagarin had Carroll at 17 of 32 at end of last year.  (Interestingly, they had Warsaw at 19).

  5. On 4/13/2024 at 10:50 AM, BTF said:

    Warsaw waxed one of 6A's better teams last year. The potential is there. I personally don't see Jeff "steamrolling" them. They're a lot like Mishawaka. Bring your A game, or you're done. 

    I'm an NLC homer and always want them to do well....but is this a reference to Warsaw beating Carroll?  Carroll was mid pack 6A at best last season.

  6. 2 hours ago, WestfieldRocks said:

    In Westfield's case, more likely a Freshman Center, such as Carmel and Zionsville have. I've heard that the HSE split in 2006 caused division in the community and that Westfield wants to avoid that. Then again, I've heard from someone that should know that the current super wants a second high school. I suppose time will tell.

    There are discussions about a 3rd high school in the the SE corner of the county.  I have no idea how serious those are or if its likely to happen.  Geographically it would seem a 3rd school would probably have to be up near Lapel, off of 32 or 38...not much open land anywhere else.  HSE currently has 4 junior high schools, so how those would spread between  3 high schools would be interesing (unless the plan was to also add some Jr high schools or restrucure what they do with grades 5-8.)

    Interesting thought problem about Indy Metro athletic confernces....If HSE and Westfield add another high school each in the next decade.....how will that change HCC/MIC/etc?

    https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=197NFgLcxNzY2NbagYL5uavc3RsRmrmiJ&scrlybrkr=180f3c06&ll=40.015709144062015%2C-85.9691205&z=12

    • Like 1
  7. 9 minutes ago, CoachMack219 said:

    This would make me think that maybe Coach Gilbert was possibly the teacher in the weight room and the other fella (Strength Coach) the aide. Would make sense that a school THAT GOOD would spend $200,000 on their strength program and student-athlete growth/ development. Almost like that stuff matters.  

    Tavio Henson is the primary Strength Coach at Westifeld.  He is one of the best in the state at what he does, for all sports.  You will see him on the sidelines for football games as well as the bench at basketball games.  

  8. 2 hours ago, BLACKGOLD2007 said:

    I saw that Penn was still like top 5 or 6 largest school in Indiana. That is still bigger than most Indy schools.  This isn't a size issue that has defeated Penn. It was complacency and at time the lack of buy in from the players. 3 of the last 5 years, on the field and sidelines you could tell, NO ONE seemed to care. Coaches wouldn't do anything and the players were stone cold silent. The D would ball out for three quarters and then get torched in the fourth because the O did not know how to sustain a drive. O-lineman would come to the bench and just sit there, no one would challenge one another. That changed two seasons ago and carried into last season. This past senior class cared and it showed. Players would hold each other accountable on the sideline. 

    I am not saying yelling determines passion, but when things are not going well or things are hard, and no one says a word...that scares me.

    I'm not disagreeing with you....but at least last cycle, Penn was near the bottom of the top ten (8 or 9th?)...but there are about 15 schools within a few hundred students over or under Penn.  I don't think that was the case back in the 80's & 90's....maybe I'm wrong. 

    If I am...may there be no yellow moons in my next bowl of Lucky Charms.

  9. When Penn was part of the elite...they were at the top of enrollment.  No one was their size save a few MIC schools (e.g. Carmel, BD).

    Growth around Indy has outpaced Granger....Penn is a very middle of the pack Indy Metro school now.  I'm obviosly biased....but there a few OC/DC's at those Indy metro schools that would be an excellent choice for a program that wants to beat those same types of schools.  

    And "No", I have no specific knowledge of any particular person applying for the Penn job.

  10. 1 minute ago, Bobref said:

    Notre Dame has held to a particular set of values for over 180 years. Any practice, of any type, that is inconsistent with those values is a nonstarter. They will win their way, or they won’t win … and every true Notre Dame person is fine with that. Believe it or not, the University is bigger than any sport, TV contract, or national championship.

    I have no argument with that....

    What I will argue with, however, is if Coach Freeman is let go for "not winning the big one"...even though he is graduating players at a very high rate.  There have been a lot of good coaches shown the door at ND since Lou.  Willingham, Weiss, and Kelly were good coaches....(I know Kelly left more or less on his terms, but his frustrations with the above discussion were well known, and were what lead him to leave...his goals are a National Champtionship.)

    Again, I'm not disagreeing with anything you or other posters have said.  Just pointing out that players and coaches who have realistic aspirations of winning a national title are likely to avoid ND.  Players in the program may have changing priorites and choose to leave.   This is the reality.

    It would be interesting if the B1G, SEC, and Big12 choose to leave the NCAA in their dust and go completley separate in FB and MBB.  Would ND choose to be the torchbearer in going back to a more traditional college athletics model...along with the leftovers of Div1?  

    Or do they want the money just as bad as everyone else?

  11. On 2/23/2024 at 4:05 PM, BTF said:

    My vote is for Notre Dame to not sell their soul to the devil. Getting to a high profile bowl game with a bunch of smart kids should suffice. 

    I'm not saying its not the proper moral or ethical choice....but do admit you are not using full resources allotted to you by the current rulebook is to say you aren't really trying to win a national championship.

    Do you think all of the coaches/players are going to be comfortable with "getting to a high profile bowl game with a bunch of smart kids"...or to they maybe want to be in position to actually win a national championship?  Which Notre Dame is fully capable of doing if they utilize the resources they have along with the current NIL and Transfer rules.  I suggest a lot of quality coaches would like to be at a place they can really win....some players may realize that ND is not actually playing to win and head for more competitive pastures.  

    I'm not saying either choice is good or bad...but a poster had asked about ND using the transfer portal.  They really aren't compared to the other top programs.  And to use your quote....ND appears to be happy getting to a nice bowl with smart kids.

  12. On 1/13/2024 at 12:27 PM, Whiting89 said:

    Out of curiosity can ND get anyone out of transfer portal or do they still have to meet some academic criteria?

    In theory...maybe.  In practice, No.

    One of the primary reasons that, while the Holy fathers "say" they are a premier national program, all they are really trying to be is the best version of the Standfords and Northwesterns.  If you want to beat B1G and SEC premier teams...you need to recruit and accept the same players they are recruiting and accepting.

    • Like 1
  13. Using WCGrad92's numbers above,  here is the disparity in schools size in the current split (6A & 5A 32 teams):

    6A

    • Carmel 5200
    • Jeffersonville 2141

    Carmel is 2.43 times bigger (Not much you can do about this, the top 16"ish" schools are just way bigger than the rest)

     

    5A

    • Valpo 2140
    • FWNS 1460

    Valpo is 1.47 times bigger

     

    4A

    • FWSS 1459 (anyone else find it interesting SS & NS are only 1 kid apart?)
    • Wash 810

    FWSS is 1.8 times bigger

     

    3A

    • Guerin 800
    • Benton Central 513

    GC is 1.56 times bigger

     

    2A

    • North Mont 513
    • Busco 378

    NM is 1.36 times bigger

     

    1A (with 64ish teams)

    • East Hancock 377
    • Attica 160

    EH is 2.36 times bigger (much larger disparity than any class but 6A...and I would agrue that effect is aggravated due to the smaller school size)

    OR

    1A (with 32)

    • Cov 281
    • Attica 177

    Cov is 1.77 times bigger (very similar to what we get in the middle of the curve)

     

    BTW a 64 class 5A (as WCGRad92 has above)

    • Valpo 2140
    • NW 1068

    Valpo is ~2 times bigger

    • Like 4
  14. 44 minutes ago, foxbat said:

    I watched Faith Christian take a 80-2 beating at the hands of Indiana School for the Deaf in 8-on-8 last season.  That should be the poster child citing for not having an automatic banishment from 1A if you are a p/p school.  If they get better, SF will take care of it.

    I'm just sharing my opinion....some people will disagree.  I would suggest 8 man matchups probably aren't the best analogy to 11 man 1A football.

    The reason I have my opinion is a desire to prevent the yo-yo effect that has occurred in larger classes from affecting 32 smallest 1A.  Especially as IHSAA has chosen to increase the point threshold for "staying up".

    Looks like some p/p folks don't agree with me....they are free to do so and I'd still drink beer with them.🍻

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...