It's time for this site to go Pay Per View

[23andCounting]

This site is averaging over 100 views for every response. I think Tim Adams goal was to have active participation rather than a bunch of viewer who provide zero content. A subscription of $5.99 per month would keep the viewers, but now they are members and might even use their keyboards to provide something rather than freeload.

[Impartial_Observer]

That was NEVER TA’s vision. 

[23andCounting]

6 minutes ago, Impartial_Observer said:

That was NEVER TA’s vision. 

That didn't take long. I get that it wasn't his ORIGINAL vision. Maybe keep the content visible for members only?

[260AC]

I really doubt anybody would pay 6$ a month for the privilege to look at the takes on here. I don't really see the harm in lurking, also ads exist.

Edited 12 hours ago by 260AC

[Bobref]

3 hours ago, 23andCounting said:

This site is averaging over 100 views for every response. I think Tim Adams goal was to have active participation rather than a bunch of viewer who provide zero content. A subscription of $5.99 per month would keep the viewers, but now they are members and might even use their keyboards to provide something rather than freeload.

Did DT put you up to this? 😂🤣

[gonzoron]

This topic from the guy who hates people that ask members for donations. 

[Muda69]

11 hours ago, 260AC said:

I really doubt anybody would pay 6$ a month for the privilege to look at the takes on here. I don't really see the harm in lurking, also ads exist.

Agreed.  And I find the ad system here on the GID especially obnoxious. It's well worth the $ I give every year to get rid of them.