Muda69

https://mises.org/wire/theres-nothing-natural-about-socialism Of course our American socialist will insists all these other countries "didn't do socialism right" and that they can do it better, bringing their version of a socialist American utopia to everybody. In other words, Venezuela all over again.

My contempt toward government education is not irrational. It is based on the concept of personal freedom, responsibility, and the fact that the government schools are failures, designed not to teach our children how to think but how to conform to the status quo. To be good little workers for the state, toiling away so the government could take a larger and larger portion of their incomes to fund the socialist agendas the likes of you and Dante love so much. https://www.naturalchild.org/articles/guest/john_gatto.html

Because if Mr. Killion truly supported school choice and public charter schools he may have not brought suit against the State of Indiana. As a legal professional where do you stand on the constitutionality of the law in question?

And I laid out my logically consistent reason for doing so. In this case I believe the end does support the means. So if you now believe I am socialist should we hug as brothers in solidarity to the cause?

Tell that to the Indiana State Legislature, who enacted the law Mr. Killion is trying to redact. And I wonder who is paying the WL legal team for this lawsuit? Oh yes, the taxpayers. On a lawsuit that has nothing to do with the the education of the WL students, but with Mr. Killion's ego and hatred of Charter schools.

No hypocrite here Night Hawk. And it's quite funny that you call your socialism ideologically consistent. Socialism is all fun and games when it’s pointing the government’s gun in someone else’s face — but the real test of its moral draw comes when it’s time for you to pony up the checkbook. How much will you pony up Night Hawk, if you even have a paying job?

No, I did not. Only in your twisted, socialist mind. The only hypocrites here are you and the other socialists.

Yes, which is why I do not support "Free College" nor "Public Education". Unlike you Night Hawk I don't want a government handout for practically everything of value.

https://www.jconline.com/story/news/2019/09/13/mitch-daniels-purdue-might-ban-staff-faculty-wagering-boilermaker-sports/2309169001/ Yep, good luck on enforcing that...................

So how exactly does tuition money = building money? Nice try Night Hawk, but your apples to oranges attempt was lame at best. Now go back to your Mom's basement in Tiny Argos. Oh wait, I forgot. You never left..............

Eddie Money Dead at 70 After Cancer Complications: https://www.tmz.com/2019/09/13/eddie-money-dead-esophageal-cancer-dies/ Truly an American Icon. He will be missed.

I don't mind government giving away what it stole from the taxpayer via taxation to build in the first place.

No, it's not. No matter how your twisted logic wants to make it so. I will never join your legion of race-to-the-bottom, everybody-has-to-be-equal socialists. And as for your comment about the free market and this subject, if Happy Hollow Elementary had been built with private funds then yes free-market forces should apply. However it is a public building, built and maintained by the taxpayers. There isn't anything about that building that was free-market, unless the WL government school corporation decides to sell it a private entity.

This $180 Dart Blaster Is More Powerful Than Anything Nerf's Ever Made: https://gizmodo.com/this-180-dart-blaster-is-more-powerful-than-anything-n-1838035684

I will never vote for your socialist butt-buddies, Night Hawk. You lust for them, not I. Now go back to your socialist nirvana of Venezuela and keep writing that supposed blog which only your mother reads, while she's sitting on the toilet of course.

Innovations in Education: Making Charter School Facilities More Affordable: State-driven Policy Approaches: https://www2.ed.gov/admins/comm/choice/charterfacilities/report_pg18.html In pursuit of the ultimate goal, yes. Go whine about it on your blog, socialist pig.

5 THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT CHARTER SCHOOL FACILITIES: https://www.publiccharters.org/latest-news/2018/09/18/5-things-know-about-charter-school-facilities

Yep, your kind of place Night Hawk.

So if you don't believe a long time, well known, and powerful government school superintendent like Mr. Killion holds significant sway over whoever is sitting on the WL government school board then you are more naive concerning power and politics than I thought.

No. If the $1 gets the Charter schools "in the door" and parents see them as ultimately superior to traditional government schools, then the traditional government schools will eventually wither away and die, then the charter schools will be shown up by the 100% private/parochial schools, then the ultimate goals of getting government out of the K-12 education business altogether can be achieved.

And Mr. Killion wants to keep it that way, primarily to keep potential Charter schools out of the WL government school district. Hence his desire to overturn the law.

It does if may help help with your ultimate goal. Just playing the long game, Irishman. So you approve of public education buildings sitting vacant and not allowing charter school to use them in an attempt to reduce school choice. Got it.

Yes, I did read the article. Did you? FTA: So Mr. Killion would rather keep the public Happy Hollow building unused than allow a Charter school to use it, as allowed by current state law. This, IMHO, is a blatant attempt to reduce school choice within the West Lafayette Government School Corporation geographical area.

I fail to see how this is exploitation by for-profit charter schools. It was the lawmakers supposed mistake, not the for-profit charter schools. Does the parent really care if a charter school is for-profit or not if it provides the quality education the parent seeks for his child? Again, this is just a maneuver by Mr. Killion to reduce school choice within the geographical boundaries of the West Lafayette Government School Corporation. It is clear from his past rhetoric the Mr. Killion hates charter schools and what they represent, real parent choice of where their taxpayer funds go.

So all Charter schools are for-profit enterprises? You sure about that? And what exactly is "fair market" about a building paid for by public funds in the first place?