Howe

The tell tale sign that liberals are fueling the chaos is the liberal mainstream media hasn’t said a word about people not wearing masks or maintaining social distance.

You really need to chill out on the racist accusations. I am the only member of my family to have a black spouse. If you went to Howe and informed all the black people that I am a racist, you would be laughed out of the building. Personally, I would like to see a male member of the Floyd family do the exact same to the murderer.

How is declaring "MAGA night" in front of the White House considered "nothing but fan the flames"? Please inform forum members "exactly what he is saying". I do not know any "crazy people dumb enough to show up there and escalate things quickly".

The liberal mainstream media is also promoting the violence and criminal behavior across America regarding Minneapolis. The obviously staged arrest of the minority CNN reporter was absolutely ridiculous.

Left wing agitators are promoting the violence and criminal behavior across America. Liberals ruin everything.

Wokeness Perhaps left Twitter or Facebook

It is comical how liberals pretend to be authorities on black people. It would be interesting to discover if any of the GID lefties has married a black person or ever attended a all black church, nightclub, theater or family reunion. I wonder if any have ever been approached by alumni association members of an inner city school and asked to join as an honorary member?

I just donated to the Trump campaign and downloaded the Trump 2020 app.

Rioting, looting and arson are not considered protests. The people in Michigan were protesting government imposed lock downs. Most of those men did not appear to be the type of guys who are concerned about their "hair" and "nails".

Twitter using CNN and the Washington Post as “fact checkers” is ridiculous. Politifact still lists the claim that all 17 U.S. Intelligence Agencies agreed the Russians hacked the DNC servers is “true”.😂

Hydroxychloroquine has been FDA approved since 1955 and has been prescribed to millions of people by thousands of doctors throughout the world.

CBS deleted this video in under 24 hours. Perhaps the thumbnail showing people gathered together at a park in San Francisco with no social distancing and only one person wearing a mask does not fit their coronavirus narrative.

Based on Liberal mainstream media fake news, Trump should have died of a heart attack by now since he has been taking hydroxychloroquine every day for the past few weeks.😂

The general election scenario that Democrats are dreading "We are about to see the best economic data we’ve seen in the history of this country," says a top former economic adviser to Obama. In early April, Jason Furman, a top economist in the Obama administration and now a professor at Harvard, was speaking via Zoom to a large bipartisan group of top officials from both parties. The economy had just been shut down, unemployment was spiking and some policymakers were predicting an era worse than the Great Depression. The economic carnage seemed likely to doom President Donald Trump’s chances at reelection. Furman, tapped to give the opening presentation, looked into his screen of poorly lit boxes of frightened wonks and made a startling claim. “We are about to see the best economic data we’ve seen in the history of this country,” he said.The former Cabinet secretaries and Federal Reserve chairs in the Zoom boxes were confused, though some of the Republicans may have been newly relieved and some of the Democrats suddenly concerned. “Everyone looked puzzled and thought I had misspoken,” Furman said in an interview. Instead of forecasting a prolonged Depression-level economic catastrophe, Furman laid out a detailed case for why the months preceding the November election could offer Trump the chance to brag — truthfully — about the most explosive monthly employment numbers and gross domestic product growth ever. Since the Zoom call, Furman has been making the same case to anyone who will listen, especially the close-knit network of Democratic wonks who have traversed the Clinton and Obama administrations together, including top members of the Biden campaign. Furman’s counterintuitive pitch has caused some Democrats, especially Obama alumni, around Washington to panic. “This is my big worry,” said a former Obama White House official who is still close to the former president. Asked about the level of concern among top party officials, he said, “It’s high — high, high, high, high.” And top policy officials on the Biden campaign are preparing for a fall economic debate that might look very different than the one predicted at the start of the pandemic in March. “They are very much aware of this,” said an informal adviser. Furman’s case begins with the premise that the 2020 pandemic-triggered economic collapse is categorically different than the Great Depression or the Great Recession, which both had slow, grinding recoveries. Instead, he believes, the way to think about the current economic drop-off, at least in the first two phases, is more like what happens to a thriving economy during and after a natural disaster: a quick and steep decline in economic activity followed by a quick and steep rebound. The Covid-19 recession started with a sudden shuttering of many businesses, a nationwide decline in consumption and massive increase in unemployment. But starting around April 15, when economic reopening started to spread but the overall numbers still looked grim, Furman noticed some data that pointed to the kind of recovery that economists often see after a hurricane or industrywide catastrophe like the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/26/2020-election-democrats-281470

Based on recently updated Indiana Department of Health coronavirus data, the mortality rate of positive coronavirus diagnosis in Cass county is approximately 0.0038%. Similar to the annual influenza virus. https://www.coronavirus.in.gov/2393.htm

Large crowds gather across America, even in San Francisco with little social distancing and very few masks.

Yet another lie included in the Mueller Dossier. Mueller was supposed to investigate "claims" of Russia hacking the 2016 election. This confirmed and documented liar was annihilated by Congressional Republicans. He was ridiculed, humiliated and absolutely disgraced on live national television during that ridiculous Mueller hearing.

Dr. Scott Atlas - Hoover Institution

Michael Flynn's judge – 3 possible reasons he hired a defense attorney https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/michael-flynn-judge-3-possible-reasons-hired-lawyer-jenna-ellis Judge Emmet Sullivan is now a one-man circus as judge, prosecutor and defendant in the same case. After the D.C. Circuit Court last week ordered Judge Sullivan to provide his reasoning in writing for not granting the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss in the Michael Flynn prosecution, the judge has taken the highly unusual step by hiring a defense attorney to respond for him. Odd, given that judicial officers provide their rationale for rulings in writing routinely as part of their job, providing the legal authority they relied upon. This is done precisely so that the record is preserved for a higher court to review upon appeal. But Sullivan didn’t render a final judgment that is now being appealed in the regular course of proceedings. He’s been ordered to “show cause” — to explain his actions — which puts him in the awkward situation of defending himself before the appellate court. So why can’t Sullivan answer now for himself? Three possible reasons come to mind: First, he could be concerned that any response will be used against him in disciplinary action or some adverse consequence. Being in a defensive posture may require defense counsel. Article III judges are lifetime appointments, but still subject to some disciplinary measures under the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which provides the ethical and judicial conduct federal judges must adhere to. There already appears to be sufficient evidence just in the public record of Sullivan’s actions in the Flynn case that he has violated several of the canons, including that judges should uphold integrity and independence of the judiciary, avoid the appearance of impropriety, and that a judge should perform the duties of the office fairly, impartially and diligently. Sullivan could face private or public censure, or request for his voluntary retirement. One could also argue that he is engaging in unethical political activity by allowing amicus statements against the motion to dismiss when he previously denied amicus 24 times in this same case, citing the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. So why allow it now, against Flynn? I’m sure the appellate court wants to know. Second, perhaps Sullivan just doesn’t have a solid rationale. Hiring a high-profile defense attorney could help bolster his position and help him come up with a back-end explanation that perhaps he had planned to create after hearing “arguments" from his appointed amicus. Judge John Gleeson was ostensibly going to help with that, so now Sullivan is doubling down by engaging a defense attorney to help him. As I’ve previously written, there is not any genuine legal argument an amicus could provide that would justify a judge ordering the prosecutor to continue their case when they have moved to dismiss (even after a plea has entered), especially on the clear bases the government provided in their motion. The bizarre trajectory of this case began as political and is continuing to be political, rather than just. If Congress were doing their constitutionally vested oversight responsibility of the judicial branch rather than using it for purely political purposes, this is an example of a case meriting impeachment inquiry. Not because the House should side with any politically charged bias, but because Judge Sullivan certainly may not. Federal judges may be removed from office upon impeachment and trial in the Senate. Fifteen prior federal judges have been impeached and of those, eight resulted in convictions and removal. Third, Sullivan could be bribed, is threatened, or is fulfilling a political promise. There is no evidence that I’m aware of to lean toward this possibility over any others, but it’s one explanation for the bizarre behavior, especially from a judge who by all reports had a record that wasn’t particularly noteworthy for being so political and blatantly disregarding the law prior to the Flynn case. It’s also not unheard, and with everything else we already know about the setup, cover-up, and railroaded prosecution, it's possible. Also, with the onerously politically biased statements already on the record from Sullivan and now dragging this on further by appointing an amicus, he appears to have some vested interest in the outcome of this case beyond his constitutional judicial role. What is his end game here? I’m sure the appellate court is interested in knowing that, too. But whatever Judge Sullivan’s reasons, Michael Flynn deserves a speedy resolution and an impartial judge, like every person in our justice system. Further, the American public deserves to know, and the D.C. Circuit correctly ordered Sullivan to respond. The fact he apparently feels he needs to be represented by defense counsel in doing so just adds another eyebrow-raising factor into the story that doesn’t seem to make any sense.