Southwestern Indiana Top 10 - Week 3 - 2026

[hhpatriot04]

Week 3 Rankings

1. (1) Memorial (3-0)

2. (2) Reitz (3-0)

3. (3) Mater Dei (3-0)

4. (4) Gibson Southern (2-1)

5. (6) North Posey (3-0)

6. (5) Castle (2-1)

7. (7) Heritage Hills (2-1)

8. (8) Boonville (3-0) 

9. (HM) Tell City (3-0)

10. (10) Forest Park (3-0)

HM: (9) North (1-2), (HM) Vincennes Lincoln (2-1), (HM) Jasper (1-2)

[hhpatriot04]

No complaints?

[AW0352]

Is this a ranking of most deserving or more of a true top 10 power poll style?   I can’t see North Posey actually beating Castle in a real game.  

[Cappy]

9 hours ago, AW0352 said:

Is this a ranking of most deserving or more of a true top 10 power poll style?   I can’t see North Posey actually beating Castle in a real game.  

Granted it was summer 11v11 scrimmages but I watched NP scrimmage BNL and North. (On film, didn’t get to attend)

I think NP vs Castle would be a good game. Not here to say you’re wrong (and we will never know) but I’d expect a very competitive game. 

Edited 15 hours ago by Cappy

[hhpatriot04]

9 hours ago, AW0352 said:

Is this a ranking of most deserving or more of a true top 10 power poll style?   I can’t see North Posey actually beating Castle in a real game.  

I like to think it's a blended version of a power poll combined with accomplishments. I try to think if the season ended today and we were deciding on seeding, how would I rate the teams. Kind of like the BCS model that combined many factors.

Example: North would probably beat Tell City and Forest Park, but I'd rather see these undefeated teams in a playoff than a two-loss North team.

[oldtimeqb]

2 hours ago, hhpatriot04 said:

I like to think it's a blended version of a power poll combined with accomplishments. I try to think if the season ended today and we were deciding on seeding, how would I rate the teams. Kind of like the BCS model that combined many factors.

Example: North would probably beat Tell City and Forest Park, but I'd rather see these undefeated teams in a playoff than a two-loss North team.

I agree with this thinking. I hate the "Vegas would favor this 9-3 SEC team H2H vs an 11-1 or 12-0 other conference team" arguments. There should be some recognition for actually winning games and not hypothetical ones on paper. 

[tango]

23 minutes ago, oldtimeqb said:

I agree with this thinking. I hate the "Vegas would favor this 9-3 SEC team H2H vs an 11-1 or 12-0 other conference team" arguments. There should be some recognition for actually winning games and not hypothetical ones on paper. 

Don't say that to ND fans...

[hhpatriot04]

36 minutes ago, tango said:

Don't say that to ND fans...

I already told them in the college forum that they have to run the table to make the postseason.

Back on topic, are we going to see the SIAC champion be a one loss team/s, or can someone run the table?

[Titan32]

Rember when it was a gauntlet to get though the SIAC scedule....those were the days.

[hhpatriot04]

10 hours ago, Titan32 said:

Rember when it was a gauntlet to get though the SIAC scedule....those were the days.

I remember.

[tango]

25 minutes ago, hhpatriot04 said:

I remember.

Nothing like the PAC...

[Titan32]

1 hour ago, tango said:

Nothing like the PAC...

I didn’t say it was.  But EVERYONE south of I64 still says it about the SIAC…things haven’t been what they once were for some time now.