Muda69

No, they don't.

I'm sorry that nobody in Brownstown knows how to make them correctly.

No need to discuss because "home cooking" is a given. Especially if the home team concession has good pork burgers. And the ice/water ratio of the water cooler left in the officials dressing room is just right.

Much like the relevancy of your beliefs.

Haven't what, exactly? Use your words, Sparty. I believe that it is.

It's called an aspect of Real Life. These children should get used to the fact that not everything is fair. I am certain my opinion is factual.

I am certain that grass is better.

White House denounces Amazon for plan to disclose cost of US tariffs: https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/white-house-amazon-tariff-price-announcement-is-hostile-2025-04-29/ So I wonder how Trump is planning on arresting Bezos or maybe deporting him if Amazon follows thru with this. I also think it funny that Trump's mouthpiece stated that "This is a hostile and political act by Amazon." where these tariffs are also a hostile and political act.

Yes, that fact is that natural grass is a better surface if you want a true home field advantage.

Thank you artificial turf. When almost all the fields surfaces are basically the same it negates any kind of home field advantage. The away team doesn't have to worry about that 5-6 inch high Kentucky bluegrass slowing everyone down, the mud pit at the 50 yard line from a torrential rain storm the night before the game, or that secret low spot/divot somewhere around the 25 yard line that the home team knows about but the visitors don't. Coaches hate variables come game day, and artificial turf removes those fantastic variables.

https://www.wfyi.org/news/articles/indiana-union-school-closure-lawmakers-no-explanation Good luck with that.

The federal government, especially our current administrative branch, is infallible, right? If they say someone is a criminal then it has to be true.

? I'm no anarchist. Not sure where you got that from, you Trump cultist you.

Trump's Understanding of Due Process Is Just As Farcical As His Definition of 'Alien Enemies': https://reason.com/2025/04/25/trumps-understanding-of-due-process-is-just-as-farcical-as-his-definition-of-alien-enemies/ Mr. Garcia is not an "Alien Enemy" of the USA. And the Trump administration will fail in trying to prove that in a court of law.

I may have more education than you, Chief. Want to compare? And a nice way to dodge your apparent allegiance to the Trump cult.

Wrong. Must be that North Newton education.

https://www.indystar.com/story/opinion/columnists/2025/04/28/iedc-audit-begins-reckoning-over-economic-development-opinion/83271897007/?tbref=hp Agreed. I had occasion to drive by the bloated, public-funded monstrosity that is the Lebanon LEAP district yesterday afternoon. What a waste of taxpayer money this boondoggle is going to be. Hey, but at least Eli Lilly gets some pretty new buildings.

Some would argue that Trump and his insistence on "loyalty" to him alone, which comes above service to the USA and it's citizens, is akin to an organization like the Mafia.

Please. Elaborate.

Then so much for real school choice.

Do you have objective proof of Mr. Garcia's MS-13 membership? From what I have read it is basically hearsay from a paid informant. And the Trump administration has admitted his expelling to El Salvador was "“an administrative error”. Why don't have the cajones and decency to correct their mistake? Oh, I forgot, everything Trump and his cronies say is automatically correct and righteous. Trump is the law, right?

Looks expensive. Did IMS allow the use of their logo royalty free?

The small town in Illinois where I have family has a high school with a proud small-school football tradition. Lots of winning seasons, tournament success, etc. But over the years they continued to have decline in enrollment that obviously affected participation in, and success of, the football program. So it seemed possible solutions were: 1) Eliminate the football program entirely. 2) Consolidate the high school with another neighboring high school. 3) Co-op with a neighboring small high school in similar circumstances. They obviously chose option #3. The football program hasn't reached the heights it was in previous decades, but it is competitive. And those increased numbers are keeping it that way for now. It seems to be a compromise that has worked well for both communities.

Based on this statement from the article I thought that only one of the schools had to have a enrollment under 300, hence the total of 750 cap: Or does this mean that 3 schools, each with an enrollment of 250, could form a co-op?