Muda69 Posted March 20, 2024 Author Posted March 20, 2024 On 3/18/2024 at 9:12 AM, temptation said: Trump: If I lose this November, the American auto industry will suffer a “bloodbath” because of Biden pushing Chinese manufactured electronic vehicles. One of Mr. Trump's MAGA mouthpieces, Rep. Jim Banks, just echoed this in an editorial in the the Indianapolis Star: https://www.indystar.com/story/opinion/columnists/2024/03/20/biden-should-pursue-section-232-investigation-as-step-to-ev-tariffs/73030097007/ I especially like this fear mongering: Quote Chinese EV imports are even more dangerous than traditional car imports. In addition to hurting our industrial capacity, they leave Americans vulnerable to Communist Party espionage and our infrastructure vulnerable to sabotage. China’s intelligence agencies could easily snoop on American drivers by pulling data from Chinese EVs. We already know that all EVs produce reams of personal data about their users, their habits, and their whereabouts. An influx of Chinese EV imports, as well as their various tech components, would give the CCP on-demand access to any and all of that. Umm, so we are ok with American, Japanese, South Korean, and German car companies easily snooping on American drivers driving data, but not just the Chinese? And here is a newsflash for Mr. Banks; they can and do pull the exact same "reams of personal data" from non-EV's as well.
swordfish Posted March 21, 2024 Posted March 21, 2024 Still waiting for the sane in the country to show up......When the current President piles on in front of his supporters but his comments are covered up by by his propaganda machine (main street media) it absolutely screams "Banana Republic".....This is just a frickin game to the Democrat Party and their ilk..... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13219965/trump-bond-james-new-york-fraud-josh-hammer.html Nothing's better for Republican unity than Democratic lunacy! Biden and the Left are salivating at the chance of bankrupting Trump, but JOSH HAMMER reveals why the $454M ruling against Donald will end up costing THEM dearly By JOSH HAMMER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM The clock is ticking for Donald Trump to secure a $454 million bond by Monday or have his assets seized by New York Attorney General Letitia James - and liberals can't contain their glee. 'You-know-who says he cannot come up with the cash,' gushed Whoopi Goldberg on 'The View ' Wednesday. President Joe Biden couldn't resist twisting the knife when he spoke at a Democrat fundraiser Wednesday night 'Just the other day this defeated looking man came up to me and said: "Mr. President I need your help. I'm in crushing debt. I'm completely wiped out,"' Biden joked. His punchline: 'Donald, I'm sorry. I can't help you.' The crowd roared. Isn't it hysterical when the legal system targets your opponent? In February, a state Supreme Court ordered Trump to pay the giant penalty after he and the Trump Organization were found to have falsified financial statements, and misled banks and insurance companies. Now, the former president is being blocked by the Democrat AG from appealing the ruling until he pays up – and you'd think Christmas came early for the Left. 'I can't believe it,' chuckled Mika Brzezinski on her MSNBC show. Brzezinski was joined by former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, one of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's top deputies in the hoax Russian collusion investigation. You won't be shocked to hear that he fears — wait for it! — more Kremlin interference. 'Everyone's national security concern is that there will be somebody, just hypothetically, like a… Russian oligarch who thinks this is a very good investment [and bails Trump out], he said. 'No one wants to lend [Trump] the money in this country,' chirped 'The View' co-host Joy Behar. 'Who knows what will happen with Russia and Saudi Arabia…' It's Russia, Russia, Russia and 2016 all over again. Trump can't secure this gargantuan bond. No insurance company is in the business of taking real estate as collateral. So, he's in a tough spot and Democrats believe their lawfare has finally drawn blood. 'I can't wait to see the chains on Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue. I'm kind of excited about it,' squealed 'The View's' Sunny Hostin. How foolish. What these unhinged Leftists don't understand – and never will – is that they are shooting themselves in the foot. Nothing's better for Republican unity than Democratic lunacy. If anything will convince stubborn Never-Trumpers to overcome their misgivings and vote for the ex-president this November, it's this brazen, extra-legal, nation-destroying madness. Yes, it appears Trump inflated his assets. And fraud is never acceptable. But it is nearly half-a-billion dollars bad? Put this penalty in perspective — Bitcoin fraudster Sam Bankman-Fried's bail was $250 million. Trump's in a tough spot and Democrats believe their lawfare has finally drawn blood. 'I can't wait to see the chains on Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue. I'm kind of excited about it,' squealed 'The View's' Sunny Hostin. And that was for a criminal, not a civil case like Trump's. Notorious Ponzi-schemer Bernie Madoff's bail was initially set at $10 million—and prosecutors eased the terms after he failed to secure it. Those men were potential flight risks who harmed real victims. They deserved a burdensome bail. But Trump is running for President, so he's not fleeing anywhere. And there are no victims in this supposed crime of the century. No financial institution lost money lending to the Trump Organization – and no one claimed to have been deceived, let alone 'defrauded,' by the Trump Organization. What's more, apparently all major real estate players juice their assets to secure favorable loans. Don't just take it from me. Here's 'Mr. Wonderful' Shark Tank star Kevin O'Leary, himself: 'If we're going to [fine Trump], let's penalize all the developers all across America. They've all done the same thing,' he said last month. 'All of them should go to jail and we should stop building buildings.' 'I would never invest in New York now,' declared O'Leary. 'And I'm not the only person saying that.' A spooked New York Governor Kathy Hochul tried her best at damage control – but blundered into saying the quiet part out loud. 'This is really an extraordinary, unusual circumstance that the law-abiding and rule-following New Yorkers who are businesspeople have nothing to worry about because they're very different than Donald Trump and his behavior,' she told a New York radio station. You see, Trump was prosecuted because he's Donald Trump. As long as New Yorkers don't threaten the Democratic establishment – they'll be safe, says the governor. It's official, we've gone full-blown banana republic! No financial institution lost money lending to the Trump Organization – and no one claimed to have been deceived, let alone 'defrauded,' by the Trump Organization. New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron denies Trump a jury trial, then assumes full control of the case and concludes mid-trial that Trump's palatial Mar-a-Lago estate is worth as little as a laughable $18 million. And it gets worse. During Tish James's 2018 campaign for AG, she vowed to pursue Trump, calling him an 'illegitimate president.' Did anyone not think the fix was in the moment she filed the lawsuit? Then, there's this judge, New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron. First, he denies Trump a jury trial, then assumes full control of the case and concludes mid-trial that Trump's palatial Mar-a-Lago estate is worth as little as a laughable $18 million. Your Honor, have you ever taken a spin through Palm Beach on Zillow? Empty lots are going for $200 million. If your Spidey-sense is going off, it's not just you. During Tish James's 2018 campaign for AG, she vowed to pursue Trump, calling him an 'illegitimate president.' Did anyone not think the fix was in the moment she filed the lawsuit? In New York, there's no bail for murderous thugs who roam the streets of the Big Apple. Yet a Republican presidential candidate, leading in the polls against Uncle Joe, gets no such mercy. Folks in the Bronx, Brooklyn, and other crime-ravaged NYC neighborhoods would love to see that reversed. No one can earnestly look at what's been done to Trump and see anything other than a vindictive witch hunt – and America is watching. Who wants to live in a country where you're targeted by the all-powerful state simply for holding the 'wrong' opinions? Never-Trumpers and supporters of Nikki Haley have a choice this November: It's either Trump or these vicious leftists, who'll stop at nothing to injure their political opponents. It won't be a hard choice.
swordfish Posted April 26, 2024 Posted April 26, 2024 It may sound like hyperbole, but Seriously, anyone that still believes President Biden was able to garner the most votes of any President in history really needs to have their head examined. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13350787/x-users-construction-worker-biden-video.html One of the hundreds of construction workers who turned out to support Donald Trump in New York has captured the heart of the nation with his savage takedown of Joe Biden. The unknown worker had been part of the crowds gathered as the former president made a visit to a construction site in Midtown Manhattan on Thursday morning. Crowds of construction workers and supporters lined up through the night as they anxiously waited to catch a glimpse of their beloved former president in what is normally Liberal heartland. After Trump left the site one construction worker was asked by a Newsmax reporter: 'What's it like seeing so many Republicans in Manhattan, so many Trump supporters in Manhattan. Does that surprise you?' The man, dressed ready for work, didn't hesitate. 'No, not at all. It's turning now. It's Trump's turn again.' He was then asked for his message to Joe Biden. Without missing a beat, he quipped: 'F**k you.'
Muda69 Posted May 8, 2024 Author Posted May 8, 2024 https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-indiana-primary-election-huge-vote-against-him-1898185 Quote There were further warning signs for Donald Trump in the Indiana GOP primary as Nikki Haley received more than 20 percent of the vote despite dropping out of the race two months ago. Trump, the presumptive 2024 Republican candidate, easily won the race on Tuesday with 78.3 percent of the vote, continuing his dominance overall in the GOP primary, but the former South Carolina governor still received 21.7 percent in Indiana, which amounted to more than 128,000 votes. POTUS was one of the races I didn't even cast a vote for yesterday. I basically only voted in local races I was interested in, for the others I just didn't cast a vote.
temptation Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 1 hour ago, Muda69 said: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-indiana-primary-election-huge-vote-against-him-1898185 POTUS was one of the races I didn't even cast a vote for yesterday. I basically only voted in local races I was interested in, for the others I just didn't cast a vote. Didn't know Indiana had so many Ukrainian born residents.
Muda69 Posted May 8, 2024 Author Posted May 8, 2024 1 hour ago, temptation said: Didn't know Indiana had so many Ukrainian born residents. ?
temptation Posted May 9, 2024 Posted May 9, 2024 9 hours ago, Muda69 said: ? If Nikki Haley can pull 20% in a race she dropped out of two months ago, there’s no other logical explanation.
Muda69 Posted May 9, 2024 Author Posted May 9, 2024 10 hours ago, temptation said: If Nikki Haley can pull 20% in a race she dropped out of two months ago, there’s no other logical explanation. So you don't believe that votes for a 'zombie" Ms. Haley were in reality a protest vote against Mr. Trump, that his political power in Indiana may not be as complete as his MAGAfans think it is?
temptation Posted May 9, 2024 Posted May 9, 2024 (edited) 2 hours ago, Muda69 said: So you don't believe that votes for a 'zombie" Ms. Haley were in reality a protest vote against Mr. Trump, that his political power in Indiana may not be as complete as his MAGAfans think it is? Eh, I don't get too caught up in it. Indiana will go red on November 5th and that is all that there really is to it. The dems' (really both parties) inability to provide a different viable option is to blame. The fact that the polls have Trump (a guy being threatened with prison time) ahead of Biden is proof of how bad its gotten. Edited May 9, 2024 by temptation 1
Bobref Posted May 9, 2024 Posted May 9, 2024 2 hours ago, temptation said: The fact that the polls have Trump (a guy being threatened with prison time) ahead of Biden is proof of how bad its gotten. I think it was Jefferson who said: “The government you elect is the government you deserve.” 1
temptation Posted May 9, 2024 Posted May 9, 2024 (edited) 3 hours ago, Bobref said: I think it was Jefferson who said: “The government you elect is the government you deserve.” I wasn’t alive but did we have a fair and honest, balanced media when Jefferson was around? The way the actions of these two buffoons who we have to choose between in November are covered by the mainstream media could not be more different. One is Hitler, no matter what decision he makes or what he says, and the other is a poor old man whom we should feel sorry for. Edited May 9, 2024 by temptation 1
swordfish Posted May 10, 2024 Posted May 10, 2024 18 hours ago, Bobref said: I think it was Jefferson who said: “The government you elect is the government you deserve.” Again - Anyone that can actually believe the current President (legally) received more votes than any other President in the history of the United States given the numerous states prosecutions and convictions for election misdeeds in the last election by blue states finally coming to light last year and this year needs to have their head examined. SMH 1 1
Bobref Posted May 10, 2024 Posted May 10, 2024 4 hours ago, swordfish said: Again - Anyone that can actually believe the current President (legally) received more votes than any other President in the history of the United States given the numerous states prosecutions and convictions for election misdeeds in the last election by blue states finally coming to light last year and this year needs to have their head examined. SMH It’s like penalties in a football game. Over time, it all evens out.
swordfish Posted May 21, 2024 Posted May 21, 2024 So, given that Mr. Cohen's admitted (under oath) larceny is in play in this trial, he now feels he can run for Congress. https://nypost.com/2024/05/20/opinion/trump-trial-in-tatters-after-michael-cohens-otherworldly-testimony/ The completion of the testimony of Michael Cohen left the prosecution of Donald Trump, like its star witness, in tatters. In the final day of cross-examination, Cohen admitted to committing larceny in stealing tens of thousands of dollars from his client. Even more notably, he admitted to the larceny on the stand — after the statute of limitations had passed. There will be no dead felony zapped back into life against Cohen, as it was for Trump. Cohen clearly has found a home for his unique skill as a convicted, disbarred serial perjurer. It was not the first time that prosecutors looked the other way as Cohen admitted to major criminal conduct: In a prior hearing, Cohen admitted under oath that he lied in a previous case where he pleaded guilty to lying. If that is a bit confusing, it was just another day in the life of Michael Cohen, who appears only willing to tell to the truth if he has no other alternative. The result is truly otherworldly. You have a disbarred lawyer not only casually discussing lies and uncharged crimes, but prosecutors who proceeded to get him to remind the jury that he is not facing any further criminal charges. If any one of those jurors had stolen tens of thousands of dollars, they would be given a fast trip to the hoosegow. Yet Cohen then matter-of-factly said he plans to run for Congress due to his “name recognition” — the ultimate proof that it does not matter whether you are famous or infamous, so long as they spell your name right. As a legislator, Cohen would have the unique ability to say he will not be corrupted by Congress — because he came to Congress corrupted. While most members wait to take office to commit felonies, Rep. Cohen would show up with a self-affirming criminal record. He could then take one of the few oaths that he has not previously violated as the Honorable Rep. Michael Cohen. At the end of the day, Cohen is the ultimate shining object for prosecutors to use as a distraction from the glaring omissions in their case. Prior witnesses testified that Trump’s payments to Cohen were designated as “legal expenses” not by Trump but by his accounting staff. Moreover, Cohen admitted that he worked for Trump for years in his murky capacity as a fixer. References to payments as a retainer were approved by Allen Weisselberg, a retired executive with the Trump Organization. The “legal expense” label was a natural characterization for a lawyer who was paid monthly and was on call as Trump’s personal counsel. In any other district, this case would never have been allowed to go to trial. It certainly now should be facing a directed verdict by the court. Indeed, with any other defendant, a New York jury would be giving a Bronx cheer in derision. Even CNN hosts and experts have admitted that this case would never have been brought against another defendant or in another district. That is what Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is counting on. The biggest problem facing the defense is not the evidence, but the judge: Judge Juan Merchan seems to be channeling George Patton’s warning, “May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won’t.” Merchan has not given any indication that he is seriously considering a directed verdict, which he should clearly grant before this goes to the jury. Merchan’s rulings have largely favored the prosecution, including some rulings that left some of us mystified. Merchan continues to allow the jury to hear references to campaign finance violations that do not exist. After gutting any use of a legal expert to testify on the absence of any such violations, the judge allowed the jury to hear Cohen state that the payments to Stormy Daniels were clearly campaign violations. All that Merchan would offer is a weak instruction telling jurors not to take such statements as proof of a violation. The alleged campaign finance violations allowed Cohen to try to implicate Trump. However, it is doubtful that Trump could have been convicted on such a charge in any other venue. It is precisely what the Justice Department tried and failed to do with John Edwards, a Democratic candidate. After that unmitigated failure, the Justice Department dropped this theory of hush money as a campaign contribution. Indeed, after reviewing the Trump payments, not only did the Justice Department decline any charges but the Federal Election Commission did not even seek a civil fine. On Monday, Merchan’s orders became even more inexplicable when Cohen’s former attorney Robert Costello took the stand. Merchan immediately started to sustain a flurry of prosecutors’ objections as Costello basically accused Cohen of multiple acts of perjury. At one point, Costello — one of the most experienced lawyers in New York and a former prosecutor — exclaimed that one of the judge’s rulings was “ridiculous.” The judge chastised Costello and even challenged him: “Are you staring me down?” In fact, it was hard not to stare. What is happening in the courtroom of Judge Juan Merchan is anything but ordinary.
Muda69 Posted May 30, 2024 Author Posted May 30, 2024 Guilty on all counts, Donald Trump becomes first US president convicted of a crime https://www.reuters.com/legal/jurors-begin-second-day-deliberations-trump-hush-money-trial-2024-05-30/ Quote Donald Trump became the first U.S. president to be convicted of a crime on Thursday when a New York jury found him guilty of falsifying documents to cover up a payment to silence a porn star ahead of the 2016 election. After two days of deliberation, the 12-member jury pronounced Trump guilty on all 34 counts he faced. Trump watched the jurors dispassionately as they were polled to confirm the unanimous verdict. Justice Juan Merchan set sentencing for July 11, just days before the Republican Party is expected to nominate Trump for president ahead of the Nov. 5 election. Trump faces a maximum sentence of four years in prison, though others convicted of that crime often receive shorter sentences, fines or probation. Incarceration would not prevent him from campaigning, or taking office if he were to win. He will not be jailed ahead of sentencing. Merchan thanked the jurors for their service and told them they were free to speak about their experience on the jury if they wished. “Nobody can make you do anything you don’t want to do. The choice is yours,” Merchan said. The verdict plunges the United States into unexplored territory ahead of the November vote, when Trump will try to win back the White House from Democratic President Joe Biden. Trump, 77, has denied wrongdoing and was expected to appeal. "This was a disgrace," Trump told reporters afterwards as he proclaimed his innocence and repeated his complaints that the trial had been rigged against him. "The real verdict is going to be Nov. 5 by the people," he said. Trump gave a thumbs-up sign through the tinted window of his SUV as his motorcade left the courthouse. Trump supporters stood in a park opposite the courthouse along with journalists, police and onlookers. Opinion polls show Trump and Biden, 81, locked in a tight race, and Reuters/Ipsos polling has found that a guilty verdict could cost Trump some support among independent and Republican voters. The jury found Trump guilty of falsifying business documents after sitting through a five-week courtroom presentation that featured explicit testimony from porn star Stormy Daniels about a sexual encounter she says she had with Trump in 2006 while he was married to his current wife Melania. Trump denies ever having sex with Daniels. Trump's former fixer Michael Cohen testified that Trump approved a $130,000 hush money payment to Daniels in the final weeks of the 2016 election, when he faced multiple accusations of sexual misbehavior. Cohen testified that he handled the payment, and that Trump approved a plan to reimburse him through monthly payments disguised as legal work. Trump's lawyers hammered Cohen's credibility, highlighting his criminal record and imprisonment and his history of lying. Merchan also cautioned jurors to examine his testimony carefully. The relatively short amount of time jurors needed to reach a verdict was a sign that they thought there was enough evidence to back up Cohen's testimony, said George Grasso, a retired New York judge who attended the trial. A source familiar with the Trump campaign's inner workings said the verdict was expected to prompt him to intensify deliberations on picking a woman as his vice presidential running mate. His campaign website labeled him a "political prisoner" and urged supporters to donate. BIDEN CAMPAIGN: NO ONE ABOVE THE LAW Biden's campaign said the verdict showed that no one was above the law and urged voters to reject Trump in the election. "There is still only one way to keep Donald Trump out of the Oval Office: at the ballot box," the campaign said in a statement. The White House declined to comment. Trump's fellow Republicans quickly condemned the verdict. "Today is a shameful day in American history," House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson said in a prepared statement. The jury notified the court they had reached a verdict at 4:20 p.m. (2020 GMT) and read out all 34 guilty counts shortly after 5 p.m. Trump lawyer Todd Blanche asked Merchan to throw out the guilty verdict, arguing that it was based on the unreliable testimony of Cohen. Merchan denied his request. Trump's near-certain appeal is likely to focus on porn star Daniels' salacious testimony about their alleged sexual encounter as well as the novel legal theory prosecutors used in the case, but he faces long odds, legal experts said. Falsifying business documents is normally a misdemeanor in New York, but prosecutors in Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office elevated it to a felony on grounds that Trump was concealing an illegal campaign contribution. Trump had complained that he could not get a fair trial in his heavily Democratic hometown. The case was widely regarded as the least consequential of the four criminal prosecutions Trump faces. Jurors heard testimony of sex and lies that have been public since 2018, although the charges themselves rested on ledger accounts and other records of Cohen's reimbursement. It was known as the "zombie case" because Bragg brought it back to life after his predecessor opted not to bring charges. This case was also likely to be the only one to go to trial before the election, as the others are delayed by procedural challenges. If elected, Trump could shut down the two federal cases that accuse him of illegally trying to overturn his 2020 election loss and mishandling classified documents after leaving office in 2021. He would not have the power to stop a separate election-subversion case taking place in Georgia. Trump has pleaded not guilty in all the cases, and has portrayed his various legal troubles as an effort by Biden's Democratic allies to hurt him politically. I'm not surprised with this verdict. Now the fun begins. Will the GOP really nominate a convicted felon to be their presidential candidate?
swordfish Posted May 31, 2024 Posted May 31, 2024 A convicted felon - for now anyway. Until after the expected appeal. BTW - anyone that believes this trial - that the State of New York had to re-write a law to make the "crime" (that was already beyond the statute of limitations) a felony instead of a misdemeanor - was real, is the same type of person that believes that the current President actually received (legally) more votes than any other President in the entire history of the United States. JS Falsifying business documents is normally a misdemeanor in New York, but prosecutors in Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office elevated it to a felony on grounds that Trump was concealing an illegal campaign contribution.
Muda69 Posted May 31, 2024 Author Posted May 31, 2024 2 hours ago, swordfish said: A convicted felon - for now anyway. Until after the expected appeal. BTW - anyone that believes this trial - that the State of New York had to re-write a law to make the "crime" (that was already beyond the statute of limitations) a felony instead of a misdemeanor - was real, is the same type of person that believes that the current President actually received (legally) more votes than any other President in the entire history of the United States. JS Falsifying business documents is normally a misdemeanor in New York, but prosecutors in Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office elevated it to a felony on grounds that Trump was concealing an illegal campaign contribution. I didn't know you were such a disbeliever in the Rule of Law. And this expected appeal probably won't be heard until after the November election. So again, will the GOP nominate a convicted felon to be their presidential candidate?
swordfish Posted May 31, 2024 Posted May 31, 2024 (edited) 43 minutes ago, Muda69 said: I didn't know you were such a disbeliever in the Rule of Law. And this expected appeal probably won't be heard until after the November election. So again, will the GOP nominate a convicted felon to be their presidential candidate? Easy answer - Yes. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/31/trump-campaign-donations-record.html And (IMHO) it will only continue to grow now that the country can see what has happened to this man. 30% of the fundraising came from new donors....... BTW - The "Rule of Law" comments coming from the Left can not apply here. When the law is bent so far in one direction to get this travesty done, there is no "Rule of Law" anymore. Edited May 31, 2024 by swordfish
Bobref Posted May 31, 2024 Posted May 31, 2024 58 minutes ago, swordfish said: BTW - The "Rule of Law" comments coming from the Left can not apply here. When the law is bent so far in one direction to get this travesty done, there is no "Rule of Law" anymore. Would you have felt the same way had there been an acquittal? I doubt it. The rule of law is not something that depends on the outcome. This is the USA, not some 3rd world tinpot dictatorship. When the law doesn’t go your way, you swallow hard, abide by the result, and move on. 1
Muda69 Posted May 31, 2024 Author Posted May 31, 2024 1 hour ago, swordfish said: Easy answer - Yes. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/31/trump-campaign-donations-record.html Morons paying for Trump's lawyers. And for what outcome? 1 hour ago, swordfish said: BTW - The "Rule of Law" comments coming from the Left can not apply here. When the law is bent so far in one direction to get this travesty done, there is no "Rule of Law" anymore. Looks for this case to go all the way to the SCOTUS. Trump and the MSM are getting what they want; more headlines.
swordfish Posted May 31, 2024 Posted May 31, 2024 (edited) 1 hour ago, Bobref said: Would you have felt the same way had there been an acquittal? YES - There should have NEVER BEEN A TRIAL! I doubt it. The rule of law is not something that depends on the outcome. This is the USA, not some 3rd world tinpot dictatorship. ***Somebody please tell Biden (or whoever is running the show)*** When the law doesn’t go your way, you swallow hard, abide by the result, and move on. So "Rule of Law" applies to re-written laws to enable a desired prosecution, dismissing the Statute of Limitations, hand-picking a judge that writes over 50 pages of jury instructions creating a roadmap so tight a guilty verdict was inevitable? Sounds more like a Banana Republic. This thing eventually gets overturned on appeal anyway. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/aug/3/inside-beltway-rush-limbaugh-predicted-donald-trum/ And here is what Limbaugh predicted on Jan. 8, 2021, about Mr. Trump and the Democrats’ possible intentions: “I know they desperately want Donald Trump gone and I know that they desperately want it codified that Trump cannot run again because make no mistake, they remain scared to death of you and they remain scared to death of Trump — and your 75 million, or 80 million votes. And I’m going to tell you, you’re not going anywhere,” Limbaugh told his listeners, assuring his them that their loyalty would remain steadfast. “They can’t separate you from Trump, and more importantly, they can’t separate you from the ideas. They can’t separate you from MAGA. They can’t separate you from Make America Great Again, which I think remains one of our big campaign strengths going forward,” he said. 52 minutes ago, Muda69 said: Looks for this case to go all the way to the SCOTUS. Trump and the MSM are getting what they want; more headlines. True. The left sure picked the wrong road to head down if they wanted to hurt Trump. Edited May 31, 2024 by swordfish
Muda69 Posted May 31, 2024 Author Posted May 31, 2024 Good thing I haven't voted for a uni-party POTUS candidate in over 20 years. My conscience is clear.
BTF Posted June 1, 2024 Posted June 1, 2024 On 5/30/2024 at 7:23 PM, Muda69 said: Guilty on all counts, Donald Trump becomes first US president convicted of a crime https://www.reuters.com/legal/jurors-begin-second-day-deliberations-trump-hush-money-trial-2024-05-30/ I'm not surprised with this verdict. Now the fun begins. Will the GOP really nominate a convicted felon to be their presidential candidate? That pretty much sums up the entire Democratic party. It's all a joke.......a game. Power first, America last. I truly feel sorry for anyone stupid enough to buy what they are selling the American public. Open borders, desperate for votes. Putting abortion clinics in all the black communities in the 70's population control, has really come back to bite them in the butt.
Recommended Posts