Muda69 Posted July 23, 2022 Posted July 23, 2022 6 minutes ago, Footballking16 said: Still failing to see where it says “promotes fair and competitive balance”…help me out. * Legt Standards für die Teilnahmeberechtigung, den Wettbewerb und den Sportsgeist fest und bietet gleichzeitig Schutz vor Ausbeutung von Schulen oder Schülern. Quote
tango Posted July 23, 2022 Posted July 23, 2022 7 minutes ago, Footballking16 said: All kidding aside, it furthers my point. It’s a revolving door. One team benefits when the other is up and vice versa. There’s a handful of teams each year who benefit from the Success Factor. It doesn’t move the needle in terms of achieving competitive balance in the least. That still seems to be falling of deaf ears. Still failing to see where it says “promotes fair and competitive balance”…help me out. I don't disagree with you on the competitive balance. SF hasn't changed all that much. Quote
Footballking16 Posted July 23, 2022 Posted July 23, 2022 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Muda69 said: * Legt Standards für die Teilnahmeberechtigung, den Wettbewerb und den Sportsgeist fest und bietet gleichzeitig Schutz vor Ausbeutung von Schulen oder Schülern. Arguably your best post of the year. Nobody has to take their time out to read it. We all win. Edited July 23, 2022 by Footballking16 1 Quote
Guest Posted July 23, 2022 Posted July 23, 2022 6 hours ago, scarab527 said: Most of the teams in that 350+ are irrelevant. You only have to move around a few to see a noticeable difference. SF isn't perfect but I think it has at least partially accomplished its goal (which I would say is competitive balance) and I believe most coaches around the state would agree. Based on the interview responses, most coaches do indeed agree. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.