Muda69 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 https://deadspin.com/college-football-bowl-opt-out-kirby-smart-nfl-draft-1851137588 Quote The bowl opt-outs are a letdown, but we all saw what happened to Jaylon Smith. During the 2016 Fiesta Bowl — which was not a playoff game — his leg was mangled. A projected top-five pick fell to the second round. Since then, many star players have made the intelligent business decision to not play in games that reward schools, sponsors, and victorious betters, but not them. Kirby Smart can complain all he wants while wearing that visor, but there is no reason for players to take part in one of the many standalone postseason games. Orange Bowl, Potato Bowl, Stoneware Bowl — if the game isn’t leading to a national championship, it is meaningless. Pride is not worth risking draft stock, and potentially a professional career, and no scolding from Stephen A. Smith and Chris “Mad Dog” Russo will change that. The executive director of Bowl Season, Nick Carparelli, has what some might consider a radical suggestion to improve participation in non-playoff postseason games. I think his idea is common sense. Players should get a cut of the money that the bowls generate. Pay people for working — *insert Miranda Priestly groundbreaking gif* “The notion that players should be compensated for participating in a bowl game at the end of the season is a very real discussion that needs to be had,” Carparelli said to Yahoo Sports’ Ross Dellenger. “I’d love to discuss with the NCAA the notion of student-athletes being compensated to promote the event itself. I’m still not sure what’s wrong with that.” He is not sure because there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. ESPN and ABC cleared out their sports calendar for bowl season. On Wednesday, the two networks will air their first NBA games since Christmas. Thursday will be TNT’s first NBA game since Dec. 19. Money is pouring in from the bowl games like cereal, mayonnaise, and eggnog on coaches’ heads. Yet, per usual, the goal of college sports is to keep money away from the people who provide the action. Without a payout, or anything meaningful to compete for, I would advise any potential April NFL draft pick to never put on pads for these holiday-season cash grabs. Maybe if players received salaries from the school, then they would be contractually obligated to play in the games. A novel thought, but that is still a fantasy world. That being said, college sports can no longer cash in on its players and offer them school, training table, and transportation to and for services rendered. As for Smith, he was fortunate that Jerry Jones took a chance on him early in the second round of the 2016 NFL Draft, and that he ended up being healthy enough to earn a 5-year, $64 million contract in 2019 — $35.5 million of which was guaranteed. He had an insurance policy that would have paid out a maximum of $5 million if a college injury prevented him from ever playing in the NFL, per Darren Rovell’s reporting at the time. But say he was drafted in the same spot by the Dallas Cowboys and eventually took the field. Smith plays one season and gets cut. He bounces around the league for a while, but he just isn’t good enough after the injury. All that he would have received was $800,000 from his policy for how far he fell in the draft, and whatever salary he could have scrounged together during a short NFL career. Does that sound worth playing football in a non-playoff Fiesta Bowl game? A smart, free-market solution to this growing problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobref Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 If I were someone paying big NIL $$, I’d put a clause in the NIL Agreement that deals with this. There are several possibilities, e.g., bonus money for participating, disgorgement of money already paid in the event of an opt out, etc. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachGallogly Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 We are headed down the path of contracts for college athletes. This will reduce the opt outs. The bigger issue is the portal window opening before the bowl games. The opt outs are a much smaller piece of the pie than the portal players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobref Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 (edited) 10 minutes ago, CoachGallogly said: We are headed down the path of contracts for college athletes. This will reduce the opt outs. The bigger issue is the portal window opening before the bowl games. The opt outs are a much smaller piece of the pie than the portal players. If it goes that way, it makes the athletes sound a lot like university employees. Can’t wait to go down that rabbit hole: worker’s compensation, disability insurance, unionization, job actions, etc. Exciting times coming! Edited January 4 by Bobref Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bash Riprock Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 hours ago, Muda69 said: https://deadspin.com/college-football-bowl-opt-out-kirby-smart-nfl-draft-1851137588 A smart, free-market solution to this growing problem. Perhaps the market is speaking....so many of these bowl games had terrible attendance...even with the New Year Day bowls outside of CFP. Perhaps people are getting tired of .500 teams and some sub .500 teams playing bowls. If players don't see them as important, why should people spend their hard earned dollars. On the flip side, it was nice to see Bo Nix (Oregon QB) play his final game in an overall meaningless game for him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muda69 Posted January 4 Author Share Posted January 4 2 hours ago, Bobref said: If it goes that way, it makes the athletes sound a lot like university employees. Can’t wait to go down that rabbit hole: worker’s compensation, disability insurance, unionization, job actions, etc. Exciting times coming! At least we can probably finally get rid of the fiction that these individuals are also attending college to get an education/degree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
temptation Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 We should get at least 11 good bowl games next year…good news because this year was blah… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTF Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 A free education is no longer good enough? "We brought you here to play football and get an education that other students are going deep into debt for. Play in the bowl game or pay us back for the last semester." College football (Division 1) is a clown show, no more, no less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobref Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 39 minutes ago, BTF said: A free education is no longer good enough? "We brought you here to play football and get an education that other students are going deep into debt for. Play in the bowl game or pay us back for the last semester." Those days are long gone, and they ain’t coming’ back. Economics dictated the rise of the current open market. There’s no putting that genie back in the bottle. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTF Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 18 minutes ago, Bobref said: Those days are long gone, and they ain’t coming’ back. Economics dictated the rise of the current open market. There’s no putting that genie back in the bottle. Ok, so how about just "pay us back for the last semester?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irishman Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 8 minutes ago, BTF said: Ok, so how about just "pay us back for the last semester?" I had mentioned this about a month ago. Instead of scholarships, have them sign contracts. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobref Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 18 minutes ago, BTF said: Ok, so how about just "pay us back for the last semester?" Think about how that would play during recruiting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTF Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 2 hours ago, Bobref said: Think about how that would play during recruiting. All or none. It would have to be an NCAA rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobref Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 20 minutes ago, BTF said: All or none. It would have to be an NCAA rule. I think you could make a good case that such a rule would amount to price-fixing, and you’d have a giant antitrust lawsuit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTF Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 10 hours ago, Bobref said: I think you could make a good case that such a rule would amount to price-fixing, and you’d have a giant antitrust lawsuit. Lol, there's a lawsuit for everything. I get it though. I work in a professional industry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.