In the era of NIL and college sports mirroring the professional game more so each day, in your opinion are college athletes (particularly revenue sport athletes) above being booed for underperformance?
This is currently a hot discussion topic in the hometown of my favorite college program.
Quarterback A returned after leading his team to a conference title, win over its main rival and playoff performance the year prior. Was told that the position was still up for grabs as Quarterback B has as higher ceiling (also comes with a higher risk in my opinion) and had a great offseason. Quarterback A would be known in the modern era as a "game manager."
Quarterback B was a 5 star out of high school, possesses a skill set running the football that Quarterback A does not and can make a few more throws than Quarterback A. Quarterback B would be known in the modern era as a "dual threat."
Quarterback A starts game 1, is not very impressive. Quarterback B comes in and looks the part...fans boo.
Quarterback B starts game 2, lights the scoreboard up and checks every box. Quarterback A comes in after the game is in hand and is once again not very impressive...fans boo.
I've seen arguments on both sides here.
Argument A: What I outlined above. In the era of NIL and college football mirroring the pros, no one is above being booed for a poor performance.
Argument B: These are still kids. They chose to play for your university. They deserve better.
Thoughts?