Jump to content
Head Coach Openings 2024 ×
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $2,716 of $3,600 target

SIAC 2023


Recommended Posts

THROUGH WEEK 8

Team PPG 

  1. Reitz 38.63 PPG

  2. Castle 37.13 PPG

  3. Jasper 32.0 PPG

  4. Bosse 31.5 PPG

  5. VL 27.38 PPG

  6. North 26.25 PPG

  7. Memorial 21.0 PPG

  8. Mater Dei 19.13 PPG

  9. Harrison 8.38 PPG

  10. Central 8.13 PPG 

Defensive Team PPG 

  1. Reitz 8.13 PPG

  2. Memorial 10.63 PPG  

  3. North 14.8 PPG

  4. VL 16.38 PPG

  5. Castle 21.3 PPG

  6. Jasper 22.8 PPG

  7. Mater Dei 27.38 PPG

  8. Bosse 38.63 PPG 

  9. Harrison 40.63 PPG

  10. Central 48.63 PPG 

Team Offensive YPG 

  1. Bosse 444.1 YPG

  2. Reitz 396.9  YPG

  3. Castle 342.1 YPG

  4. North 340.8 YPG 

  5. VL 321.3 YPG

  6. Jasper 311.6 YPG

  7. Memorial 261.0 YPG

  8. Mater Dei 251.1 YPG (No Week 6 Stats)

  9. Harrison 195.1 YPG

  10. Central 158.5 YPG 

Team Offensive Passing YPG 

  1. Bosse 223.63

  2. Reitz 193.5 YPG

  3. Memorial 167.88 YPG 

  4. Castle 144.13 YPG 

  5. North 134.63 YPG

  6. Central 110.13 YPG

  7. Mater Dei 99.86 YPG (No Week 6 Stats)

  8. Harrison 97.5

  9. VL 90.63 YPG

  10. Jasper 27.14 YPG (Did not pass in Week 2) 

Team Offensive Rushing YPG

  1. Jasper 287.88 YPG

  2. VL 230.13 YPG

  3. Bosse 221.34 YPG

  4. North 206.13 YPG

  5. Reitz 203.38 YPG

  6. Castle 198.0 YPG

  7. Mater Dei 151.3 YPG (No Week 6 Stats)

  8. Harrison 97.63 YPG

  9. Memorial 93.13 YPG

  10. Central 48.38 YPG 

Defensive Passing (allowed) 

  1. Memorial 90.75 (726 yards) (57/120, 0.475) (Avg: 48.6% CR)

  2. Bosse 102.0 YPG (714 yards) (53/93, 0.57)(Avg: 53.6% CR)*

  3. Reitz 108.88 YPG (871 yards) (64/158, 0.405) (Avg: 35.7% CR)

  4. North 120.88 YPG (967 yards) (92/175, 0.526) (Avg: 50.4% CR)*

  5. Castle 126.63 YPG (1013 yards) (91/143, 0.636) (Avg: 62.1% CR)

  6. Harrison 129.4 YPG (906 yards) (70/110, 0.636) (Avg: 63.4% CR)***

  7. VL 149.0 YPG (1192 yards) (113/195, 0.579) (Avg: 58.3% CR)

  8. Central 155.0 YPG (1244 yards) (75/111, 0.676) (Avg: 66.4% CR)

  9. Jasper 159.63 YPG (1277 yards) (98/174, 0.563) (Avg: 56.0% CR)

  10. Mater Dei 160.5 YPG (1284 yards) (80/126, 0.635) (Avg: 67.4% CR)

Defensive Rushing (Allowed) 

  1. Reitz 96.13 YPG (769 yards) (248C, 2.83 YPC)

  2. North 109.25 YPG (874 yards) (231C, 3.46 YPC)

  3. Memorial 125 YPG (1000 yards) (245C, 3.82 YPC)

  4. Jasper 132.13 YPG (1057 yards) (231C, 4.39 YPC) 

  5. VL 156.0 YPG (1248 Yards) (239C, 4.69 YPC)

  6. Mater Dei 175.38 YPG (1403 yards) (241C, 5.90 YPC)

  7. Central 208.25 YPG (1666 yards) (229C, 7.67 YPC)

  8. Castle 244.13 YPG (1953 yards) (297C, 6.41 YPC) 

  9. Harrison 249.13 YPG (1993 yards) (273C, 7.58 YPC) 

  10. Bosse 265.86 YPG (1861 yards) (252C, 7.41 YPC)* 

Defensive Total YPG (Allowed) 

  1. Reitz 205. YPG

  2. Memorial 215.75 YPG 

  3. North 230.13 YPG

  4. Jasper 291.75 YPG

  5. VL 305.0 YPG

  6. Mater Dei 335.88 YPG

  7. Harrison 362.38 YPG

  8. Central 363.75 YPG

  9. Bosse 367.86 YPG*

  10. Castle 370.75 YPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TransplantedPanther said:

That Bosse finished 7th is a banner year for them in recent years. Maybe starts an uptick for them?

Possible, they did have 2-3 games this season that could have gone their way. However, losing Wagner is a massive blow to their offense. I do believe they did have several junior/sophomore starters coming back for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TigerFan20 said:

Regular season Standings- Final

1. Reitz 9-0

2. Jasper  6-3

3. Castle 6-3

4. Memorial 6-3

5. Vincennes 6-3

6. North 6-3

7. Bosse 3-6

8. Mater Dei 2-7

9. Harrison 1-8

10. Central 0-9

2nd straight year for Reitz winning the SIAC by 3 games 

I fixed it for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TigerFan20 said:

Lol It’s a joke if a rival is placed above Jasper, official standings came from Sokeland

 

Ok. I was a little confused lol. My head is still spinning after being at one game but keeping up with outrageous scores elsewhere. Should’ve gone to the North game. Curious as to how they still scored so many points, even with a running clock! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, TigerFan20 said:

It was pretty much a running clock score after the 1Q, 35-0 or 42-0

Don’t care. 2018 Tigers could have hung 70 on 10 of their 15 opponents. Run the ball up the middle with JV and freshman.  
But when your not use to success you don’t understand how to handle it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Screagle said:

Don’t care. 2018 Tigers could have hung 70 on 10 of their 15 opponents. Run the ball up the middle with JV and freshman.  
But when your not use to success you don’t understand how to handle it. 

I should have explained it better, was a little bit tired last night. But if you are up 42-0 after the 1Q, just run the ball with the backups in…

Edited by TigerFan20
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that the playoffs... I mean postseason tournament... I wonder.  Do Mater Dei and Bosse deserve to play next Friday?  What I mean is that most states with some sort of playoff qualifier would result in both the Wildcats and Bulldogs turning in equipment Monday instead of playing a 6-3 team next Friday.  

I personally have no problem with the all-in format vs qualifier. Seeding vs blind draw? Well that is another question. 

 

PS - If you haven't read the article in the C&P by @kylesokeland regarding the closed nature of SIAC football scheduling, I highly recommend it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...