Leaderboard

Yep, with a name like I-am-a-leav-a what did Tennessee expect?

From a newsletter I read occasionally: Wait … what happened? This: Even as someone accustomed to Trump’s edge-pushing, this was … a lot. This is, in fact, outrageous. It is intolerable. It is wicked. It cannot stand. Here’s the White House line: But the evidence that he is a gang member is not at all solid, and there is no evidence that he is a terrorist. He was here legally, though that’s not how he came. He should have been deported using normal channels years ago, but he wasn’t, and now he has the legal right to stay here. The man was sent away without any chance to prove his case. Andy McCarthy, the former federal prosecutor, explains. Excerpt: What if those desires are — what’s the word? — illegal? That’s what is at issue. Abrego Garcia should have been deported much earlier, as he came here illegally. But he obtained legal status allowing him to remain in the US. Maybe that was a mistaken ruling, but nevertheless, that is the law. Even Trump’s government admits that Abrego Garcia was deported because of an “administrative error”. Trump is now saying that the US Government has no authority to compel El Salvador to send one of its citizens back to America. This is absurd: all Trump has to say to Bukele is, “Send him back,” and it will be done. McCarthy: The Trump team keeps repeating the line that Abrego Garcia is a “terrorist,” and that justifies what they’re doing. But that has not been proven! He denies it, and his denial in court hearings in the past were persuasive to the courts. What gives Trump special knowledge, such that he knows better than judges who have heard the evidence? What we know is that in 2019, the Trump administration alleged that Abrego Garcia is in MS-13 — based primarily on the claim of a confidential informant, and the fact that he wore a Chicago Bulls hat and a hoodie. The informant said Abrego Garcia was part of MS-13 in New York — a place in which he has never lived. Abrego Garcia strongly denies he has anything to do with MS-13. He could be lying. How are we to know without due process? In any case, there has never been any substantiation of the claim that this man was or is in MS-13. Besides which, the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that Abrego Garcia has the right to be in America. Maybe the Court is completely wrong, but that is how the system works. Trump is only defying the Court now based on a technicality. As far as I’m concerned, Abrego Garcia, who entered the US illegally, should be deported. There is a way to do that legally: bring him back, lift the court stay preventing him from being deported, and send him back legally. After all, SCOTUS said that Abrego Garcia had been wrongfully deported because of an “administrative error.” This was the position of the Trump administration … until suddenly, it wasn’t. Stephen Miller went on Fox News and claimed otherwise: They fired an excellent Justice Department lawyer for advancing the same view as ICE and the Trump-appointed Solicitor General? I guess Team Trump needed a scapegoat rather than admit that they are in error here. It seems that the White House is using a technicality in the SCOTUS ruling to avoid doing what common sense and common decency requires: bringing Abrego Garcia back and sending him home the legal way. (And “home” means to El Salvador, not necessarily to that brutal maximum security prison there.) This is a bright red line, I think, because the administration is not only transparently concocting a narrative to justify its mistaken, illegal deportation of this guy, but it is also flagrantly defying the Supreme Court. Again, it’s not exactly a direct defiance, because the Court left just enough space for Team Trump to pretend that it has no power to compel El Salvador to send Abrego Garcia back. But think about it: what if you were illegally deported to a Supermax prison in El Salvador, and the Supreme Court ordered that you be returned to the US. How would you feel if the administration threw up its hands and said, “Sorry, but we can’t tell the government of El Salvador what to do”? Keep in mind that even though Abrego Garcia is not a US citizen, and was, in fact, in the US illegally, he still had the protection of the law. This is a bright red line, having to do with the rule of law. I am generally supportive of the aggressive stance Trump has taken on deportations of illegals. This problem has grown nearly uncontrollable because of previous administrations, both Democratic and Republican, not taking it seriously. I anticipate that there will be bureaucratic errors in this process, and don’t consider them to invalidate the mission. But when those mistakes come to light, then the administration must backtrack, and do things legally. This eagerness to defy the courts is destabilizing of the legal and constitutional order. The only way, it seems, that the administration can tamp down public anger is to keep repeating the line that Abrego Garcia is an MS-13 member — an allegation based on a single information, that has never been substantiated. The administration’s willingness to leave a possibly innocent man languishing in that El Salvador prison shocks the conscience. So do stories like this, about Merwil Guitierrez, a 19-year-old Venezuelan illegal taken off the streets of New York and sent to that same prison. The kid was swept up in an ICE raid and shipped off to the prison in El Salvador, despite the fact that there is no evidence that he had anything to do with a gang, and the absence of any criminal charges against him. Again, the fact that he was in America illegally is sufficient evidence to deport him. But to dispatch this teenager to live as a captive among some of the hardest criminals in the world? In what moral universe does that make sense? As one Fourth Circuit federal appeals court judge wrote in the three-judge panel’s April 7 ruling denying the government’s claim: This is a fundamental rule of law question. So I ask you again: if the Trump administration erroneously and illegally put your husband, son, or brother — an American citizen — on a deportation flight to El Salvador, and when called on by the Supreme Court to bring you back, said, “Hey, we can’t make the Salvadorans let him go” — how would you feel about it? From that Fourth Circuit ruling: I see today that members of the administration are on message about Abrego Garcia being a “terrorist” and “MS-13 member”. What is preventing them from the showing the evidence they have that stand up that claim? You can’t make the disturbing aspects of this case go away by simply asserting over and over that the guy is in MS-13, and hoping that people will believe you just because you say it often enough. Here is a link to detailed information about Abrego Garcia’s detention, and the hearsay evidence that got him tagged as a gang member. Who is the law here — the Supreme Court, or Donald Trump? This is indeed “a slippery — and dangerous — constitutional slope.” Do we want to be rid of illegal immigrants so badly that we are prepared to accept something like this? Where then would you and I hide if the US Government decided that the country would be better off if we were stuffed away in some Salvadoran hellhole prison, despite our legal right to be in the United States? This is indeed a very, very slippery slope. Trump is 100% wrong on this. His actions are illegal. One would hope that Congress would have the fortitude to impeach him over it.

Almost all associations now do online meetings. The IHSAA required 2 of the meetings to be in person last year. I preferred all in person but that went away with COVID. People complain too much about the time to attend meetings especially since some have to travel a decent distance to attend. I will vouch for the NE group though. They have excellent veteran officials and provide quality training.

The high road has the best view.

Ultimately about 5 years ago the NCAA is to really blame because they're hubris got the best of them and thought that they would just win every court case coming their way and they sat there idle knowing that they were just going to have this security immorality clause in their corner Instead they get caught with their pants down and the Wild Wild West has occurred and now they're scrambling to catch up to try to. Oh what's the word that I've been saying all the time now Establish guardrails yep, that's the buzz word phrase Good luck with that

Perhaps this was part of Coach primes contract extension Big giant OOOOOOOOOF

The tennis courts have been replaced. I’m sure some other things have been done as well, but I’m not certain as to what.

New Press Box at Salem.

I think cases like this one are just accelerating the demise of college athletics. With their hands tied as far as what they can do, it does appear the NCAA can set limits as well as standards for how agents operate. The pro leagues have some very demanding and strict guidelines in place for registering as an agent. I am surprised that it at least appears the NCAA has done very little so far, or does not seem interested in doing anything of substance.

Completely agree. I would say there are more options for East Noble to find a great matchup for themselves to prep them for 4A than there is for Snider to prep themselves for 6A. If Snider were to drop East Noble, hopefully East Noble goes out and finds another 5A or 6A that can better them for the rest of their season. From an East Noble standpoint, you are absolutely correct.