It's time for this site to go Pay Per View

[23andCounting]

This site is averaging over 100 views for every response. I think Tim Adams goal was to have active participation rather than a bunch of viewer who provide zero content. A subscription of $5.99 per month would keep the viewers, but now they are members and might even use their keyboards to provide something rather than freeload.

[Impartial_Observer]

That was NEVER TA’s vision. 

[23andCounting]

6 minutes ago, Impartial_Observer said:

That was NEVER TA’s vision. 

That didn't take long. I get that it wasn't his ORIGINAL vision. Maybe keep the content visible for members only?

[260AC]

I really doubt anybody would pay 6$ a month for the privilege to look at the takes on here. I don't really see the harm in lurking, also ads exist.

Edited Thursday at 01:52 AM by 260AC

[Bobref]

3 hours ago, 23andCounting said:

This site is averaging over 100 views for every response. I think Tim Adams goal was to have active participation rather than a bunch of viewer who provide zero content. A subscription of $5.99 per month would keep the viewers, but now they are members and might even use their keyboards to provide something rather than freeload.

Did DT put you up to this? 😂🤣

[gonzoron]

This topic from the guy who hates people that ask members for donations. 

[Muda69]

11 hours ago, 260AC said:

I really doubt anybody would pay 6$ a month for the privilege to look at the takes on here. I don't really see the harm in lurking, also ads exist.

Agreed.  And I find the ad system here on the GID especially obnoxious. It's well worth the $ I give every year to get rid of them.

 

[PDB26]

1 hour ago, gonzoron said:

This topic from the guy who hates people that ask members for donations. 

Might need a wellness check on old 23.

[23andCounting]

17 hours ago, Bobref said:

Did DT put you up to this? 😂🤣

Saw that one coming. Fair take. 

[23andCounting]

4 hours ago, PDB26 said:

Might need a wellness check on old 23.

Lol, thanks for sharing that. I've got that guy on "ignore." He has no business soliciting donations. In fact, he probably costs the GID money in the long run. 

[gonzoron]

7 hours ago, PDB26 said:

Might need a wellness check on old 23.

A hypocrisy check is what's needed.

[First_Backer_Inside]

On 8/12/2026 at 9:51 PM, 260AC said:

I really doubt anybody would pay 6$ a month for the privilege to look at the takes on here. I don't really see the harm in lurking, also ads exist.

If anyone is paying $6 a month to read my $hit, I want a percentage of the cut lol. I will stop having a school I'm affiliated with and will only post to the digest about my name, brand, and likeness. @Coach Nowlin I want to sign the first NIL deal the GridironDigest has ever signed. Let's make history!

[gonzoron]

14 minutes ago, First_Backer_Inside said:

If anyone is paying $6 a month to read my $hit, I want a percentage of the cut lol. I will stop having a school I'm affiliated with and will only post to the digest about my name, brand, and likeness. @Coach Nowlin I want to sign the first NIL deal the GridironDigest has ever signed. Let's make history!

Your cut is gonna be $.02, I guess we have to round up to $.05 since there's no such thing as 2 cents anymore. And don't take any wooden nickels.

Edited yesterday at 02:42 PM by gonzoron

[Titan32]

Folks are too lazy to go through the sign-up process.  It's easier to say stupid Sh!t on facebook.

[hhpatriot04]

Just no. TA is rolling over in his grave. Post more. Complain less.

[Coach Nowlin]

12 hours ago, Titan32 said:

Folks are too lazy to go through the sign-up process.  It's easier to say stupid Sh!t on facebook.

we had a tech issue last year that caused issues on getting folks to be able to sign up:    @DK_Barons fixed it over the off season..... 

 

[Impartial_Observer]

22 hours ago, Titan32 said:

Folks are too lazy to go through the sign-up process.  It's easier to say stupid Sh!t on facebook.

I will say, we seem to have a little more “sophisticated” group here. The FB groups seem to be this year’s dads, who’s background obviously don’t include sports of any kind. 
 

[Rodney]

34 minutes ago, Impartial_Observer said:

I will say, we seem to have a little more “sophisticated” group here. 

That is how I usually tend to describe myself,

 

"sophisticated".

[23andCounting]

5 hours ago, Rodney said:

That is how I usually tend to describe myself,

 

"sophisticated".

I'll be posting a Top 25 unless someone beats me to it. I'll expect your sophisticated response. WAIT...............you're now with Carroll?

Edited 50 minutes ago by 23andCounting