Jump to content
Head Coach Openings 2024 ×
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $2,716 of $3,600 target

Roncalli vs Shortridge and other clearly lopsided sectional games


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Footballking16 said:

I’d tell Elkhart and Warsaw to beef up their schedules.
 

Elkhart has the second easiest schedule of any 6A team in the state (and lost to the single 6A opponent they’ve played) while Warsaw hasn’t played a single 6A opponent yet.

So your not really a proponent of winning.  You would prefer that coaches use the Avon model over the Elkhart model.  Tell the kids losing is fine, just as long as you lose to the best teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FinePrint said:

So your not really a proponent of winning.  You would prefer that coaches use the Avon model over the Elkhart model.  Tell the kids losing is fine, just as long as you lose to the best teams.

Avon wouldn’t be in a postseason that effectively cuts the field in half at the end of the regular season as they are currently a bottom half Sagarin rated team.

If Warsaw or Elkhart played Avon’s schedule they wouldn’t be 7-1 or 6-2. 
 

What’s your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coach Curtis to his Warsaw players:  "Boys, we're going to leave our conference next year and beef up our schedule!  We might not win many games, but by golly, we're going to make the playoffs!  So keep your heads up, boys!  Winning 3 games and making the playoffs is a lot better than winning 8 and missing out!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CJJL said:

I spent 5 years coaching in Illinois. This is EXACTLY what happened. Great point.

 

And teams that avoid competition (see Elkhart and Penn) run the risk of missing out on the postseason altogether under a rating system that simply measures more than just W-L. Unless every team plays a round robin schedule, comparing W-L record is a highly ineffective way of comparing teams.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FinePrint said:

Coach Curtis to his Warsaw players:  "Boys, we're going to leave our conference next year and beef up our schedule!  We might not win many games, but by golly, we're going to make the playoffs!  So keep your heads up, boys!  Winning 3 games and making the playoffs is a lot better than winning 8 and missing out!"

Is that his response to his team when they inevitably get shellacked after playing their first real competition?

Logical sense says that Penn, Elkhart, and Warsaw need to ditch their current conferences, start their own, and reach out for help. Carroll and Homestead would be good additions, Snider and Dwenger on top of those two would be even better. Playoff qualification or not, this benefits all those schools in the long run when it is time to play real elimination games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Footballking16 said:

You said every team makes the NCAAT. You are 100% wrong in that regard. The teams that qualify for the NCAAT do so in part due to regular season success. The all-in format doesn’t reward regular season success, let alone recognize it. You’re completely contradicting yourself and furthering my point. You look foolish in the process as well.

Keep trying.

So it’s Cluster system or all-in? There’s no in-between? 50% inclusion is a compromise of both two terrible postseason formats. Solid analogy.

Again, keep trying.

They only used the Cluster system in 1983 and 1984.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Footballking16 said:

Avon wouldn’t be in a postseason that effectively cuts the field in half at the end of the regular season as they are currently a bottom half Sagarin rated team.

If Warsaw or Elkhart played Avon’s schedule they wouldn’t be 7-1 or 6-2. 
 

What’s your point?

Right.  Missing it by 2 places.  Maybe if they beat 2-6 Noblesville this week and the stars align they could still make it!  To @Bobref's point, they would be playing a meaningful regular season game.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Footballking16 said:

Did the tournament in 1979 and 1980 actively take 50% of the field at the conclusion of the regular season?

It just sounded like you thought that they were using the cluster system in 1979-1980.  Some people like things they way they are and some don't.  You can do whatever you want but its not going to stop blowout games.  There might not be as many blowouts but things like this will still happen.

Tippecanoe Valley 1979

Sectional Championship

67 Central Noble 0

Regional Championship

63 North Judson 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tippy said:

It just sounded like you thought that they were using the cluster system in 1979-1980.  Some people like things they way they are and some don't.  You can do whatever you want but its not going to stop blowout games.  There might not be as many blowouts but things like this will still happen.

Tippecanoe Valley 1979

Sectional Championship

67 Central Noble 0

Regional Championship

63 North Judson 6

Blowouts are the very least of my concern when it comes to the all-in. In fact I encourage them until the IHSAA wakes up and says enough is enough.

My issue with the all-in is that it renders the regular season meaningless. In fact it doesn’t even acknowledge it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Footballking16 said:

Blowouts are the very least of my concern when it comes to the all-in. In fact I encourage them until the IHSAA wakes up and says enough is enough.

My issue with the all-in is that it renders the regular season meaningless. In fact it doesn’t even acknowledge it.

I think every game means something to someone.  I don't think they are going to change things anytime soon.  You seem very unhappy about this.  I don't know what to tell you.  All we can do is enjoy the rest of this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Footballking16 said:

My issue with the all-in is that it renders the regular season meaningless. In fact it doesn’t even acknowledge it.

If the regular season is so meaningless, why are we all on here every week talking about that week's games?

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, FinePrint said:

If the regular season is so meaningless, why are we all on here every week talking about that week's games?

Think how many more people you could annoy with the interest generated by multiple “quasi-playoff” games every week!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, FinePrint said:

Right.  Missing it by 2 places.  Maybe if they beat 2-6 Noblesville this week and the stars align they could still make it!  To @Bobref's point, they would be playing a meaningful regular season game.

Hey, at least someone is catching on.

You’re coachable, I’ll give you that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FinePrint said:

Coach Curtis to his Warsaw players:  "Boys, we're going to leave our conference next year and beef up our schedule!  We might not win many games, but by golly, we're going to make the playoffs!  So keep your heads up, boys!  Winning 3 games and making the playoffs is a lot better than winning 8 and missing out!"

I pointed out previously, I think a situation of qualifications could have implications on conferences and rivalries and possibly beyond.  What does that mean to Indiana?  I'm less sure as I'm a reverse carpetbagger round these parts, but I hear that conferences are big in Indiana.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Tippy said:

I think every game means something to someone.  I don't think they are going to change things anytime soon.  You seem very unhappy about this.  I don't know what to tell you.  All we can do is enjoy the rest of this season.

I do find the discussion somewhat interesting as I've never seen anything close to a groundswell of support FROM THE PLAYERS about regular season games not meaning anything.  It might be a fan issue, but of the various players that I've known over the years in Indiana, I've not ever heard of complaints about the regular season games not meaning anything.  The smell on the bus?  Check.  The long drive into another timezone? Check.  The small visiting locker room with one working toilet?  Check.  Not getting cheese on the Subway sandwiches on the ride even though their parents paid for cheese?  Check.  Horrible fields? Check.  Too hot?  Check.  Too cold? Check.  Regular season games not meaning something?  Not so much.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, foxbat said:

I do find the discussion somewhat interesting as I've never seen anything close to a groundswell of support FROM THE PLAYERS about regular season games not meaning anything.  It might be a fan issue, but of the various players that I've known over the years in Indiana, I've not ever heard of complaints about the regular season games not meaning anything.  The smell on the bus?  Check.  The long drive into another timezone? Check.  The small visiting locker room with one working toilet?  Check.  Not getting cheese on the Subway sandwiches on the ride even though their parents paid for cheese?  Check.  Horrible fields? Check.  Too hot?  Check.  Too cold? Check.  Regular season games not meaning something?  Not so much.

This. If you told any coach or player in the state that regular season games don't mean anything, you'd get laughed out of the room. 

As you should be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, foxbat said:

I do find the discussion somewhat interesting as I've never seen anything close to a groundswell of support FROM THE PLAYERS about regular season games not meaning anything.  It might be a fan issue, but of the various players that I've known over the years in Indiana, I've not ever heard of complaints about the regular season games not meaning anything.  The smell on the bus?  Check.  The long drive into another timezone? Check.  The small visiting locker room with one working toilet?  Check.  Not getting cheese on the Subway sandwiches on the ride even though their parents paid for cheese?  Check.  Horrible fields? Check.  Too hot?  Check.  Too cold? Check.  Regular season games not meaning something?  Not so much.

At the end of the day, the final score of all 9 regular season games mean absolute ZILCH in regards to the postseason. That is a fact and is irrefutable. 
 

You can take absolute joy in winning a conference championship or beating a huge rival, but at the end of the day and the end of the regular season it means jack squat. Everybody reverts back to 0-0. There’s zero gained advantage by having a better regular season than your peers. It’s a travesty. It happens nowhere else in this country outside IHSAA sanctioned tournaments. What you accomplish in the regular season is meaningless come week 10.

Change my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, scarab527 said:

This. If you told any coach or player in the state that regular season games don't mean anything, you'd get laughed out of the room. 

As you should be. 

If you tell your players that going undefeated puts you in the best position to advance in the tournament, you’d be called an absolute liar.

As you should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Footballking16 said:

If you tell your players that going undefeated puts you in the best position to advance in the tournament, you’d be called an absolute liar.

As you should be.

Good thing no one is making that claim lmao. Keep constructing strawmen so that you can knock them down.

Hope it makes you feel better about yourself. This is getting sad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...