Leaderboard

If I see you watching GS on your phone I will punch you in the throat....

https://www.14news.com/2021/09/03/touchdown-live-scoreboard-week-3/ Just Scroll down past Coach Goebel Interview and you'll find the remaining Live Stream Schedule!

Let me clarify, how does highlights of them..sound better?...no...ok...Please don’t punch me in the throat..

We hear this every year. Heard it last year. All I’ll say is, it’s early, relax and enjoy watching your Panthers have another great year. Long ways to go before Sectionals. As far as Tipton’s OC goes. He played in 14 games at QB at Wisconsin and has been Tipton’s OC the last several years. He does an outstanding job but not sure what that has to do with anything.

Will someone please take his shovel, he doesn’t seem to know when to quit digging.

The only guarantee about playing a Kentucky team in Kentucky? The Titans will get absolutely ZERO calls go their way. It's a good scheduling move by Coach Hart. Traveling that far to play, bad officiating, and a tough opponent. Dress rehearsal for all the things that come with a deep playoff run.

On film...they look scary good to me, but I'm just a caveman lawyer.

here is irrefutable proof as to what can happen when you field your special teams with players not ready.......

I always used my best players if they could help us on special teams. In 2006 our best player at KV was our running back who also started as a safety. He returned kicks and punts. Against Calumet he had 435 all purpose yards with 4 td's. That is an impact I cannot keep on the bench. Was there a chance he could get hurt absolutely, just like there is a chance to get hurt on any play. If they have a change to make an impact you use them. We had the same philosophy when I coached at Brebeuf and our star running back returned kicks as well.

I agree with your assessment. South Montgomery's wins have been over better programs that Clinton Central and Clinton Prairie.

Geuax TIGUHS!

NLC Teams ranked/receiving votes in polls after Week 3: 5A: Mishawaka (Ranked - 4th AP / Ranked - 7th Coaches) Concord (RV - 15th AP only) 4A: Northridge (Ranked - 7th AP / RV - 11th Coaches)

I am kind of surprised that there are not more livestreams. Ft Wayne does almonst every SAC game and a lot of the central Indiana schools are doing their own broadcasts.

Chatard hasn’t been in the south semi state for the past 2 years…. that’s how HH got past semi state 2 years ago…😂. Just kidding. But I think if you ask these seniors..they didn’t want the “stars to align”. They wanted to play Memorial and Chatard in the postseason. GS has beaten Memorial a few times on their way to sectional titles. And this senior group beat Memorial 22-0 at Memorial as freshmen (without Brady). They wanted a shot to be the first to get past Chatard. But they’ll just have to compete with who’s ever in front of them now. Either way… it’s going to be a fun ride the next couple of months.

You are correct on both statements. The first one should have been a touchback and the second one live ball as long as the ball hasn't crossed the goal line plane. The location of the feet is irrelevant in relation to the goal line.

Well, we’ve got a nice discussion going, including a “rant.” 😂 I’m happy to throw a little fuel on the fire. As long as I’ve been officiating, there has been an ongoing debate about the proper interpretation of the IG rule and, specifically, where does the concept of “duress” figure in to the equation, if at all? So, I will play Devil’s Advocate. Scenario #3: This is where the rubber meets the road, and the controversy begins. Here’s an excerpt from an article by George Demetriou (he’s long been my go-to guy for interpretation of NF rules) appearing last month in Referee: “Where the ball meets the ground is of no consequence unless the referee judges the passer was under duress. Although that term does not appear in any rulebook, it is the embodiment of the motivation to conserve yardage and is indisputably a critical component of the foul. Duress is a judgment call and solely is within the domain of the referee. There can be a foul for intentional grounding to conserve time without duress, but not to conserve yardage — the intent to save yardage is simply not there unless a sack of the passer is likely.” In his publication “Redding Study Guide to NFHS Football Rules,” Demitriou writes that one type of IG is a pass “thrown (under duress) into an area where there is no eligible Team A receiver.” (2020 Ed., p. 34). So, if time were critical in our play, it could be considered to be a foul. But if the QB simply gives up on the play without being in danger of being sacked, it’s no foul, since he was not “under duress.” Here are a couple of excerpts from an article by Bill Lemonnier, one of the most accomplished white hats in B1G officiating history: “When talking about intentional grounding, we use the term “under duress” as a pre- qualifier or requirement for ING to be called. It makes sense... a passer who’s under duress, in trouble or about to be sacked might intentionally throw the ball/pass away to avoid the loss. …” “The next question is if the QB/passer is NOT under duress can he just end the play by throwing the ball into an area where there is no receiver or if he’s still in the tackle box, just throwing the ball forward to the ground and incomplete? And how about the QB/passer who throws the ball high over the end line when deep in the red zone? Most would argue that the passer is not avoiding a loss of yardage when no “heavy rush” is imminent. He’s only giving up the down.” So, using the philosophy these two highly respected officiating leaders say is the proper way to interpret the rule, the answer to Scenario #3 above is: No foul.

Just run the dam* triple option out of this set. 🙂

The Spread is the natural response to a few big programs hoarding talent and ramming it down ur throat... in order for less talented programs to compete.. they had to find a way to isolate thier playmakers thus lessing the impact of being outmanned.... ie Basketball on Grass..... the roots having nothing to do w the vidio game culure... jmho

Yeah, only some kind of class action would do anything, although this could be a very large class.

Coach Hart and his staff are CLASS ACTS! I am sure that they will represent IN well, and WIN!!!

Our kids will compete.

That was funny, but nothing can match this one

It’s a Husky tradition for the team to eat breakfast at Erika’s Place in Cicero on game day. They usually meet at 6 am before school, but since today is an elearning day, they met at 9. My kids brought brunch home for me, one of Erika’s famous Breaded Pork Tenderloins. The mustard is on the bottom side.

Ok....Devil's advocate. Now give a detailed explanation of "duress". 😁 If a QB is safely in the pocket, 10 yards behind the LOS....is he in "duress"? If after scanning for an open receiver, and not finding one for a few seconds....with the pocket still intact and 10 yards behind the LOS...is the QB in duress? If in the next seconds, the pocket collapses and the QB is under heavy pressure is he under duress? Under which of the above circumstances above would Mr. Demetriou allow a QB to IG the ball? I would argue that any high school QB knows that the progression of events from #1 to #3 happens very quickly. By intentionally grounding the ball at step #2, he is avoiding the loss of yardage that he may reasonably assume will happens if he waits until the play gets to #3. Should be flagged. Is there not a reason the specific exemption for IG is written into the "kill the clock"? Immediately after the snap. To me that is the only way for the QB to truly not be in duress....at all other points, the QB is being actively pursued by the defense. Now, if we want to allow the QB to ground the ball when not under "duress" (as Mr. Demetriou seems to describe it)...I would suggest making the ball down at the spot of the throw. How many officials want to have that on their plate along with everything else you have to manage with an arguably undersized crew? None so it will never happen. At LEAST 2 rules are in the book to address when a QB can intentionally ground the ball. (IG rule and kill the clock rule. I don't think adding conjecture to that is necessary. You either ground it at the snap, or have to get it in the vicinity of a receiver (and I'm ok with chucking it well over a guys head on sideline or redzone...QB has to have enough ability and time to get that done). Great discussion....I just think we have too many lawyers in the officiating business, making the plain language of the rules more complicated than necessary.🤪