Jump to content
Head Coach Openings 2024 ×
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $2,716 of $3,600 target

Steroid use is still a major issue in schools. We need to confront it.


Recommended Posts

https://www.indystar.com/story/opinion/readers/2024/05/13/steroid-use-is-still-a-major-issue-in-schools-we-need-to-confront-it/73526479007/

Quote

In Indiana, our sense of community and shared values are the bedrock of our Hoosier identity. However, a concerning trend threatens our youth — the rise in performance-enhancing drug use. This issue not only jeopardizes individual health but also undermines the fabric of our communities. 

From classrooms to football fields, the allure of PEDs has seeped into the lives of our youth, posing a significant threat to our collective well-being. Shockingly, one study showed 12% of boys reported using products to enhance appearance, muscle mass or strength. These statistics demand our immediate attention and action.

By prioritizing comprehensive education and prevention efforts, we can empower our youth to resist the pressures of PED use. Initiatives such as the Indiana Department of Education's "Healthy Schools" program and community-based organizations provide valuable resources for intervention. 

Throughout my years in high school and my undergraduate studies as a biology major, I've witnessed peers fall prey to the allure of performance-enhancing drugs. It's imperative that we raise awareness and advocate for further research on this issue.

As proud Hoosiers, it's our responsibility to confront this issue head-on and protect the future of our community. Together, let's stand united in our commitment to safeguarding our Hoosier identity and ensuring the wellbeing of generations to come.

Elias Kessilyas is from Carmel.

Is this really that bad of a problem in Indiana?  What can be done to prevent it?

 

  • Disdain 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d be willing to bet that most kids are referring to creatine and weight gainers. When asking kids if they use anything to enhance their appearance that leaves a lot to interpretation. “12% of boys reported using products to enhance appearance, muscle mass or strength” vs “12% of boys reported using steroids” would have been more in line with the clickbait headline. The author clearly doesn’t know the difference. And he refers to “one study” for his data set. A quick peek at his LinkedIn says he has “research experience”. This article might be the full extent of that experience. 

 

This is the actual cited reference from the article “According to a 2016 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the prevalence of PED use among high school athletes in the United States ranged from 2.7% to 4.0%, depending on the specific sport.6 Another study found that 8% of girls and 12% of boys used products to improve appearance, muscle mass, or strength, and 3.3% of high school students admitted to using steroids.7

 

“3.3% of high school athletes admitted to using steroids” is the actual number. 

 

This is the cited study: 

  • Dandoy C, Gereige RS. Performance-enhancing drugs. Pediatr Rev. Jun 2012;33(6):265-71; quiz 271-2. doi:10.1542/pir.33-6-265
It’s from 2012. Not sure that it qualifies as “still a major issue”.
 
Why did I waste my time going down this rabbit hole? I must be bored out of my skull this morning.
  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Just a dad said:

I’d be willing to bet that most kids are referring to creatine and weight gainers. When asking kids if they use anything to enhance their appearance that leaves a lot to interpretation. “12% of boys reported using products to enhance appearance, muscle mass or strength” vs “12% of boys reported using steroids” would have been more in line with the clickbait headline. The author clearly doesn’t know the difference. And he refers to “one study” for his data set. A quick peek at his LinkedIn says he has “research experience”. This article might be the full extent of that experience. 

 

This is the actual cited reference from the article “According to a 2016 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the prevalence of PED use among high school athletes in the United States ranged from 2.7% to 4.0%, depending on the specific sport.6 Another study found that 8% of girls and 12% of boys used products to improve appearance, muscle mass, or strength, and 3.3% of high school students admitted to using steroids.7

 

“3.3% of high school athletes admitted to using steroids” is the actual number. 

 

This is the cited study: 

  • Dandoy C, Gereige RS. Performance-enhancing drugs. Pediatr Rev. Jun 2012;33(6):265-71; quiz 271-2. doi:10.1542/pir.33-6-265
It’s from 2012. Not sure that it qualifies as “still a major issue”.
 
Why did I waste my time going down this rabbit hole? I must be bored out of my skull this morning.

Thank you for your post.  When I read the original article, I thought the exact same.  Is the author referencing steroids, or are they grouping in products such as protein supplements, creatine, etc.?  Appreciate the data you shared.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

This is a letter to the editor.  Please don't click on the link...it just encourages the Star to do more of this.

I agree on all points from Just a Dad.  

The headline was likely generated by IndyStar and not the letter writer.  The cited study does not state 12% use steroids, that 12% includes MANY over the counter, legal supplements and stimulants (would I recommend the use of all these "legal" products to an athlete...No)...and it appears the headline purposely misconstrues this data to generate clicks.

Also, the 3.3% of athletes that "USE STEROIDS"????...It comes from this question on the survey:

"In relation to steroid use, the survey asks if the teenager “ever took steroid pills or shots without a doctor’s prescription one or more time during their life.”

Should kids being doing this....hard No.  But taking a single dose of Prednisone off label one time in your life, is NOT what most of us would consider a "user of steroids".

This study and the accompanying letter to the editor are perfect examples of how any "scientific study" can be crafted to get the data you want...and then any "news" article can then cite that study and create a headline to influence the minds of suburban moms everywhere (no offense to my wife who is, in fact, a suburban mom).😁

Edited by US31
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Muda69 said:

OMG!!! This is a big problem in College football!!! 😡

My son told me that a lot of the boys on his team last fall were using performance enhancing drugs!!! 💪

Someone told the Athletic Director and he decided to drug test the team! 👏 👏 👏

But then one of the upperclassmen found out about it! He was the best defensive player on my son's team, a big strong linebacker!!! 💪 💪 💪

The night before the drug tests, this upperclassman had the other players on the team do something called an oil change!! My son wouldn't tell me what that means, but he said it helps you pass a drug test even if you've been using drugs!!! 😱

The team must have passed the drug tests because no one got in any trouble!!! 🙈 🙉 🙊

Edited by Lucy Draper
a
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Lucy Draper said:

OMG!!! This is a big problem in College football!!! 😡

My son told me that a lot of the boys on his team last fall were using performance enhancing drugs!!! 💪

Someone told the Athletic Director and he decided to drug test the team! 👏 👏 👏

But then one of the upperclassmen found out about it! He was the best defensive player on my son's team, a big strong linebacker!!! 💪 💪 💪

The night before the drug tests, this upperclassman had the other players on the team do something called an oil change!! My son wouldn't tell me what that means, but he said it helps you pass a drug test even if you've been using drugs!!! 😱

The team must have passed the drug tests because no one got in any trouble!!! 🙈 🙉 🙊

I should add that my son plays for one of the best college football teams in the USA!!! 🐐 🐐 🐐

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, US31 said:

any "scientific study" can be crafted to get the data you want

I get your point, and it’s a valid one. But to truly be a “scientific” study, the outcome cannot predetermined. Conclusions go where the data lead them. Calling this “scientific “ gives it more credence than it deserves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Just a dad said:

I’d be willing to bet that most kids are referring to creatine and weight gainers. When asking kids if they use anything to enhance their appearance that leaves a lot to interpretation. “12% of boys reported using products to enhance appearance, muscle mass or strength” vs “12% of boys reported using steroids” would have been more in line with the clickbait headline. The author clearly doesn’t know the difference. And he refers to “one study” for his data set. A quick peek at his LinkedIn says he has “research experience”. This article might be the full extent of that experience. 

 

This is the actual cited reference from the article “According to a 2016 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the prevalence of PED use among high school athletes in the United States ranged from 2.7% to 4.0%, depending on the specific sport.6 Another study found that 8% of girls and 12% of boys used products to improve appearance, muscle mass, or strength, and 3.3% of high school students admitted to using steroids.7

 

“3.3% of high school athletes admitted to using steroids” is the actual number. 

 

This is the cited study: 

  • Dandoy C, Gereige RS. Performance-enhancing drugs. Pediatr Rev. Jun 2012;33(6):265-71; quiz 271-2. doi:10.1542/pir.33-6-265
It’s from 2012. Not sure that it qualifies as “still a major issue”.
 
Why did I waste my time going down this rabbit hole? I must be bored out of my skull this morning.

Zero percent chance there are 12% of kids using steroids lol 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

what a bs study. here is a small list of things that would qualify for "enhance appearance, muscle mass, or strength".

1. hair gel
2. anything you can buy at gnc

whoever wrote this should be shunned from society for intentionally misleading people

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SARMS are what is big right now with HS athletes.  Like anything else, these kids are in real danger of getting counterfeit products online that could negatively impact their health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, US31 said:

This study and the accompanying letter to the editor are perfect examples of how any "scientific study" can be crafted to get the data you want...and then any "news" article can then cite that study and create a headline to influence the minds of suburban moms everywhere (no offense to my wife who is, in fact, a suburban mom).😁

I agree TOTALLY that this study is outdated and irrelevant to the headline created by said media outlet (IndyStar). However, I do feel it's dangerous (because of society's insistence that they/ we know more than the experts in *insert any field of study here*) to suggest that "any 'scientific study' can be crafted to get the data you want," due to the fact that ACTUAL researchers (not whatever this guy was/ claims to be) take the time to minimize bias and the skewing of results in their studies. Even this not so great study that this letter to the editor references are not "alarming numbers" and the data (as @Just a dad pointed out kindly) CLEARLY indicates/ explains how their study was conducted, what the results were. The problem there is that people have to read (and know how to) in order to understand WHAT the study says/ studied, and A LOT of folks won't go through that effort and thus, the headline wins...  

 

I truly believe the REAL PROBLEM, as you pointed out, is the misleading headline, writing, and publishing of a "letter to the editor" article that references data that is 12 years old (well outside of the appropriate mark for quality research) by a newspaper/ publication that (I assume) many on this forum either read, have read, respect, or have respected previously. 

53 minutes ago, Bobref said:

I get your point, and it’s a valid one. But to truly be a “scientific” study, the outcome cannot predetermined. Conclusions go where the data lead them. Calling this “scientific “ gives it more credence than it deserves.

This is essentially my point above. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, btownqbcoach1 said:

Zero percent chance there are 12% of kids using steroids lol 

12% using various legal supplements, sure...

12% using the illegal juice, NO SHOT. If so, I'd have won A LOT more games (or so I'd like to believe). 😂

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CoachMack219 said:

12% using various legal supplements, sure...

12% using the illegal juice, NO SHOT. If so, I'd have won A LOT more games (or so I'd like to believe). 😂

I actually think... "12% using various legal supplements" is probably a low number. I know for a fact, it would be for ours. 

 

47 minutes ago, Rodney said:

what a bs study. here is a small list of things that would qualify for "enhance appearance, muscle mass, or strength".

1. hair gel
2. anything you can buy at gnc

whoever wrote this should be shunned from society for intentionally misleading people

Bingo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bobref said:

I get your point, and it’s a valid one. But to truly be a “scientific” study, the outcome cannot predetermined. Conclusions go where the data lead them. Calling this “scientific “ gives it more credence than it deserves.

note that I put "scientific study" in those quotation thingy's👍🍻

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe steroid use is this rampant lol.. there may be some outliers, but there is no way it's more than 1%. 

Unless mom and dad are buying it for them, or they are getting it from their local gym dealer, I feel it would be too costly/hard to get. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...