Staxawax Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 1 minute ago, PHJIrish said: How can you start a game before the fans enter and are seated? Why allow fans if that's the case? It’s a Covid thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miner_35 Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 Just now, PHJIrish said: Have you seen the replay Bob? Replay doesn't matter. He impeded the receiver from coming back to try and make a play. You can not do that regardless of the receiver being out of bounds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHJIrish Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 Just now, Staxawax said: It’s a Covid thing. I will make you a wagerless bet that the next game won't start before the fans are seated! It's the biggest game of the year, and they can't start early just for TV's sake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huge Football Fan Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 7 minutes ago, javaswat01 said: Ooof, that Pass Interference call was poor, to put it mildly. Nevermind the fact that the WR took multiple steps out of bound running down the sideline It was a cutoff and clear foul 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miner_35 Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 1 minute ago, scarab527 said: Defender was playing the ball all the way. The Dunning-Kruger Effect makes me laugh. He was impeding the receiver from making a play on the ball. Get a rule book and show me anything different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wvigo13 Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 4 minutes ago, PHJIrish said: No, contact didn't make the receiver step out, receiver stepped out before the contact. What were you watching? I watched it 5 times. Receiver was IN BOUNDS until the defender makes contact and pushes him out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHJIrish Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 1 minute ago, miner_35 said: Replay doesn't matter. He impeded the receiver from coming back to try and make a play. You can not do that regardless of the receiver being out of bounds. So the rule must have changed. If the receiver steps out of bounds he should be an ineligible receiver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtimeqb Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 1 minute ago, miner_35 said: Replay doesn't matter. He impeded the receiver from coming back to try and make a play. You can not do that regardless of the receiver being out of bounds. Agreed. Day 1 DB drills. Hand on the hip/love handle area = rarely a flag Armbar across the chest = always a flag Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staxawax Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 PHJ, I get what you’re saying. And I doubt they would start. But if they’re intent on staying on schedule, having fans get in late would not change their minds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
javaswat01 Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 6 minutes ago, miner_35 said: You two have no clue. Receiver was being pushed out of bounds by defender. Interference everytime. Ignorance like this makes me laugh lol go back and rewatch that play. the replay shown in the ihsaatv broadcast showed him stepping out of bounds twice while running down the sideline, neither time as a result of contact I have no dog in this fight so don't care either way but your comments are factually incorrect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miner_35 Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 Just now, PHJIrish said: So the rule must have changed. If the receiver steps out of bounds he should be an ineligible receiver. This is incorrect and he is not an ineligible receiver. He becomes an illegal participant if he catches the ball or make a block I do believe. Had been that way since I became an official. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHJIrish Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 Just now, Staxawax said: PHJ, I get what you’re saying. And I doubt they would start. But if they’re intent on staying on schedule, having fans get in late would not change their minds. The schedule was unrealistic to begin with is what I'm getting at and that's because of COVID. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huge Football Fan Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 1 minute ago, PHJIrish said: So the rule must have changed. If the receiver steps out of bounds he should be an ineligible receiver. Maybe changed on 1960 then but a eligible stays eligible throughout the down doesn’t matter if they go out of bounds or not. If they go out of bounds on their own and then return it’s illegal participation but they are still eligible so what you said is 100% wrong 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
temptation Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 Great win for public education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miner_35 Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 1 minute ago, javaswat01 said: lol go back and rewatch that play. the replay shown in the ihsaatv broadcast showed him stepping out of bounds twice while running down the sideline, neither time as a result of contact I have no dog in this fight so don't care either way but your comments are factually incorrect Even if he steps out of bounds, you can not prevent the receiver from making a play on the ball. The defender does this DPI, no matter what Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHJIrish Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 1 minute ago, javaswat01 said: lol go back and rewatch that play. the replay shown in the ihsaatv broadcast showed him stepping out of bounds twice while running down the sideline, neither time as a result of contact I have no dog in this fight so don't care either way but your comments are factually incorrect I have no dog in the fight either and I agree with you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mebuck Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 Is this Webo 4 Title in 5 Years? Will they be moving up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHJIrish Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 Just now, Huge Football Fan said: Maybe changed on 1960 then but a eligible stays eligible throughout the down doesn’t matter if they go out of bounds or not. If they go out of bounds on their own and then return it’s illegal participation but they are still eligible so what you said is 100% wrong So illegal participation doesn't really matter in your scenario, is that what you're saying? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miner_35 Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, PHJIrish said: So illegal participation doesn't really matter in your scenario, is that what you're saying? Only illegal if he catches the ball or makes a block. @Bobref would be better at this explination. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenderbender Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 Just said only 3rd team to three peat. Is that right? Or is that in 2A? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huge Football Fan Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 5 minutes ago, PHJIrish said: I have no dog in the fight either and I agree with you! I disagree and I’ve watched is 10 times 24”cuts” off the route and has contact before 85 ever touches oob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SL816 Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, PHJIrish said: So illegal participation doesn't really matter in your scenario, is that what you're saying? He didn't do anything to make him an illegal participant, even if he went out on his own. He didn't touch the ball or block. That was going to be a tough catch. The defender was in good position until he started forcing him off his route. No problem with the call. A non-call decides the game also......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huge Football Fan Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 4 minutes ago, PHJIrish said: So illegal participation doesn't really matter in your scenario, is that what you're saying? From what I see 24 makes illegal contact before 85 ever touches oob. I have it paused and 85’s left foot is in the air and the illegal contact has already occurred. 4 minutes ago, miner_35 said: Only illegal if he catches the ball or makes a block. @Bobref would be better at this explination. No the rule is participate. Those things are part of but not limited too participating Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
07_statechamp54 Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 Very sad for these Luers kids to have a game be decided that way. I thought when they got the ball back with 1:55 that they shouldn’t of been conservative. Stay true to who you are and drive the ball downfield but hey. Now it’s on to next year, your goal remains the same. This loss should fuel you to be better. This is a great thing for everyone on this thread/forum who hates parochial and private schools. It’s like Christmas come a few weeks early! I’m not sure why there is so much hate, but enjoy basking in it. Much respect to Webo. Hard fought game. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miner_35 Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 1 minute ago, SL816 said: He didn't do anything to make him an illegal participant, even if he went out on his own. He didn't touch the ball or block. That was going to be a tough catch. The defender was in good position until he started forcing him off his route. No problem with the call. A non-call decides the game also......... What some do not understand is that there is no such thing as uncatchable in high school. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.